AshmoreR. D. (1990), ‘Sex, gender and the individual’, in PervinL. A., (ed.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, New York: Guilford Press.
2.
AusterC. J.OhmS. C. (2000), ‘Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation using the Bem Sex Role Inventory’, Sex Roles43, 499–528.
3.
BairdJ. (1996), ‘What's in a name? Experiments with Blind Marking in A-level Examinations’, paper presented at the British Psychological Society conference, London, 17–18 December.
4.
BemS. (1974), ‘The measurement of psychological androgyny’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology42, 155–62.
5.
BemS. (1979), ‘The theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to Pedhazur-Teten-baum and Locksley-Colten critiques’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37, 1047–54.
6.
BemS. (1987), ‘Masculinity and femininity only exist in the mind of the perceiver’, in ReinischJ. M.RosenblumL.SandersS. (eds), Masculinity/Femininity: Basic Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
Blanchard FieldsF.Suhrer-RousselL.HertzogC. (1994), ‘A confirmatory factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Old questions, new answers’, Sex Roles30, 423–57.
8.
BoalerJ. (1994), ‘When do girls prefer football to fashion? An analysis of female underachievement in relation to “realistic” mathematics contexts’, British Educational Research Journal20, 551–64.
9.
BradleyC. (1984), ‘Sex bias in the evaluation of students’, British Journal of Social Psychology23, 147–53.
10.
DeliaJ. (1972), ‘Dialects and the effects of stereotyping on interpersonal attraction and cognitive processes in impression formation’, Quarterly Journal of Speech58, 285–97.
11.
DwyerC. A. (1976), ‘Test Content in Mathematics and Science: The Consideration of Sex’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, in MurphyR. J. L., (ed.) ‘Sex differences in examination performance: Do these reflect differences in ability or sex-role stereotyping?’, Educational Review30 (1978), 259–63.
12.
FrancisB.ReadB.RobsonJ. (2002), ‘First-class or Failure? Assessing the Assessment of Undergraduate Writing (with Particular Attention to Gender)’, paper presented at the British Educational Research Association conference in Exeter, 12–14 September.
13.
FrancisB.ReadB.MellingL.RobsonJ. (2003), ‘Lecturers' perceptions of gender and undergraduate writing style’, British Journal of Sociology of Education24, 357–73.
14.
GippsC. V. (1994), Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Assessment, London: Falmer Press.
15.
GippsC.MurphyP. (1994), A Fair Test? Assessment, Achievement and Equity, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
16.
GrafR. G.RidellJ. C. (1972), ‘Sex differences in problem solving as a function of problem context’, Journal of Educational Research65, 451–2.
17.
GreatorexJ.BellJ. F. (2002), ‘What Makes a Senior Examiner?’paper presented at the British Educational Research Association conference, Exeter, 12–14 September. Available at www.ucles-red.cam.ac.uk.
18.
GreenS.JohnsonM.O'DonovanN.SuttonP. (2003), ‘Changes in Key Stage 2 Writing from 1995 to 2002’, paper presented at the UK Reading Association conference, Cambridge, 11–13 July. Available at www.ucles-red.cam.ac.uk.
19.
Hamp-LyonsL. (1990), ‘Second language writing: Assessment issues’, in KrollB., (ed.) Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom, Norwood NJ: Ablex.
20.
KiwanD.PollittA.AhmedA. (1999), paper presented at the British Psychological Society conference, London, 20–1 December. Available from www.ucles-red.cam.ac.uk.
21.
LynnR.MauW-C. (2001), ‘Gender differences on the Scholastic Aptitude Test, the American College Test and college grades’, Educational Psychology21 (2), 133–6.
22.
MoodyJ. (1999), ‘Jobs for the Boys? An Investigation into the Under-representation of Women in Senior Examining Positions with OCR’, unpublished M.Ed. dissertation, University of Bristol.
MurphyR. J. L. (1978), ‘Sex differences in examination performance: Do these reflect differences in ability or sex-role stereotyping?’Educational Review30, 259–63.
25.
MurrayB. (1976), ‘Androgyny and Sex-role Stereotypes: Women's Health and Self-perceptions and Perceptions of Psychological Health in Others’, doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology. Dissertation Abstracts International 37,1444B, University Microfilms No. 76–79,645.
26.
NewsteadS. E.DennisI. (1990), ‘Blind marking and sex bias in student assessment’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education15, 132–9.
27.
NewtonP. E. (1996), ‘The reliability of marking of GCSE scripts: Mathematics and English’, British Educational Research Journal22, 405–20.
28.
PirieM. (2001), ‘How exams are fixed in favour of girls’, Spectator, 20 January.
29.
RuthL.MurphyS. (1988), Designing Writing Tasks for the Assessment of Writing, Norwood NJ: Ablex.
30.
Scottish Examining Board (1992), ‘Investigation into the Effects of the Characteristics of Candidates and Presenting Centres on Possible Marker Bias’, internal report, Edinburgh: Scottish Examination Board.
31.
SpearM. G. (1984), ‘Sex bias in science teachers' ratings of work and pupil characteristics’, European Journal of Science Education6, 369–77.
32.
StobartG.ElwoodJ.QuinlanM. (1992), ‘Gender bias in examinations: How equal are the opportunities?’British Educational Research Journal18, 261–76.
33.
VannR. J.LorenzF. O.MeyerD. M. (1991), ‘Error gravity: Faculty response to errors in the written discourse of nonnative speakers of English’, in Hamp-LyonsL., (ed.) Assessing Second Language Writing in Academic Contexts, Norwood NJ: Ablex.
34.
WeigleS. (1998), ‘Using FACETS to model rater training effects’, Language Testing15, 263–87.
35.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987), ‘Doing gender’, Gender and Society1, 125–51.
36.
WoodR. (1978), ‘Sex differences in answers to English Language comprehension items’, Educational Studies4, 157–65.
37.
WoodR. (1991), Assessment and Testing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.