American Association of University Women (1991), Shortchanging Girls, Shortchanging America: A call to action, Washington DC: American Association of University Women.
2.
Lengin-BucellC. (1990), ‘Self-esteem Comparisons among Intellectually gifted Minority/non-minority Junior High Students’, paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston MA.
3.
LinnM. C.HydeJ. S. (1989), ‘Gender, mathematics, and science’, Educational Researcher, 18 (8) 17–17, 22–27.
4.
CarrollJ. B. (1993), Human Cognitive Abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies, New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
EkstromR. B.FrenchJ. W.HarmanH. H. (1976), Kit of Factor-referenced Cognitive Tests, Princeton NJ: ETS.
6.
LinnM. C.PetersenA. C. (1985), ‘Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis’, Child Development56, 1479–98.
7.
TartreL. A. (1990), ‘Spatial skills, gender and mathematics’, in FennemaE.LederG. (eds), Mathematics and Gender: Influences on teachers and students, New York: Teachers' College Press, pp. 27–59.
8.
TracyD. M. (1987), ‘Toys, spatial ability, and science and mathematics achievement: Are they related?’Sex Roles17, 115–38.
9.
VoyerD. (1996), ‘The relation between mathematical achievement and gender differences in spatial abilities: A suppression effect’, Journal of Educational Psychology88, 563–71.
10.
VoyerD.VoyerS.BrydenM. P. (1995), ‘Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables’, Psychological Bulletin117, 250–70.
11.
WheatleyG. H. (1997), ‘Reasoning with images in mathematical activity’, in EnglishL. D., (ed.) Mathematical Reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images, Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 281–97.
