Determining gender learning-style preferences is necessary in assuring that principal preparation programmes are inclusive of styles that benefit both males and females. The purpose of this study was to determine if there were any gender differences for students in a principal preparation programme on responses to items measuring pedagogy (science of teaching children) and andragogy (science of teaching adults). Of the thirteen items on which there was statistical significance between genders' preferences, males had higher mean scores on nine items (70 per cent) and females on four items (30 per cent). Males had higher mean scores than females on all items measuring pedagogy and males and females had an equal number of high mean scores in response to items that measured andragogy.
AndersonLKrathwohlD (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, New York: Longman.
2.
BarwoodG (2002) ‘Boys and reading: Clues to gendered social practice’, New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, vol 36(1), pp 71–9.
3.
BeiderCTitmusC (1997) ‘Concepts and practices of education and adult education: Obstacles to lifelong education and lifelong learning?’, International Journal of Lifelong Education, vol 4(12), pp 12–18.
4.
BelenkyMBlytheCGoldbergerNTaruleJ (1986) Females' ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind, New York: Basic Books. Retrieved November 25, 2005 from: http://www2.nu.edu/nuri/llconf1995/birkey.html:National.
5.
BransfordJBrownACockingR (2000) How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, Washington: National Academy Press.
6.
BurnsJBraceyP (2001) ‘Boys’ underachievement: Issues, challenges, and possible ways forward’, Westminister Studies in Education, vol 24(2), pp 155–66.
7.
CallisteAGeorgeS (2000) Anti-racist feminism: Critical race and gender studies, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.
8.
CarterS (2004) And We Only Read One Thing About a Black Person: Examining the processes and consequences of whiteness and high school English curriculum, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
9.
CassidyJDittyJ (2001) ‘Gender differences among newborns on a transient otoacoustic emissions test for hearing’, Journal of Music Therapy, vol 38, pp 28–35.
10.
CerveroRWilsonA (1999) ‘Beyond learner-centered practice: Adult education, power, and society’, Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, vol 13(2), pp 27–38.
CostaPTerracianoAMcCraeR (2001) ‘Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol 81(2), pp 322–31.
13.
DanielsHCreeseAHeyVLeonardDSmithM (2001) ‘Gender and learning: Equity, equality and pedagogy’, Support for learning, vol 16, pp 112–16.
14.
DavenportJ (1987) ‘A way out of the andragogy morass’, Paper presented at the conference of the Georgia Adult Education Association, Savannah, GA.
15.
DelahayeB (2000) Human resource development: Principles and practices, Brisbane, Australia: John Wiley and Sons.
16.
DelahayeBLimerickDHearnG (1994) ‘The relationship between andragogical and pedagogical orientations and the implications for adult learning’, Adult Education Quarterly, vol 44(4), pp 187–200.
17.
DevriesK (2002) Developing a constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical principles and activities, New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
DonaldsonJ (1993) ‘A triangulated study comparing adult college students' perceptions of effective teaching with those of traditional students’, Continuing Higher Education Review, vol 57(3), pp 147–65.
19.
ErtmerPNewbyT (1993) ‘Behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective’, Performance Improvement Quarterly, vol 6(4), pp 50–72.
20.
FalkJDierkingL (2002) Lessons without limits: How free choice learning is transforming education, Annapolis MD: Institute for Learning Innovation.
21.
FogelsongS (2002) A correlational study of health and long typologies in adult students, Department of Educational Studies: University of Central Florida.
22.
GallMBorgWGallJ (1996) Educational research: An introduction, New York: Longman Publishers.
23.
GayLAriasianP (2003) Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
24.
GorhamJ (1985) ‘Differences between teaching adults and pre-adults: A closer look’, Adult Education Quarterly, vol 35(4), pp 194–209.
25.
GuffneyJRamppL (1997) Learning in 21st century public schools: Andragogy as a catalyst for praxis, (ED 417 189).
26.
HartreeA (1984) ‘Malcolm Knowles’ theory of andragogy: A critique’, International Journal of Lifelong Education, vol 3, pp 20–30.
27.
HiemstraRSiscoB (1990) Individualizing instruction: Making learning personal, empowering, and successful, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
HinesMCunninghamSCurtisC (2005) ‘Reconfiguring the rainbow: A unique offering to multi-coloring the diversity of middle school achievement’, Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education, vol 2(4), pp 14–15.
29.
Karmiloff-SmithA (2002) ‘Elementary, my dear Watson, the clue is in the genes… Or is it?’, The Psychologist, vol 15(12), 608–11.
30.
KlattB (1999) The ultimate training workshop handbook: A comprehensive guide to leading successful workshops and training programs, New York: McGraw-Hill Retrieved November 25, 2005, from http://www-distance syr edu/andragogy html.
KnowlesM (1992) ‘Applying principles of adult learning in conference presentations’, Adult Learning, vol 4(1), 11–14.
33.
LindemanE (1926) The meaning of adult education, New York: New Republic Retrieved November 29, 2005 from http://www infed org/thinkers/et-lind htm.
34.
LitwinM (2002) How to assess and interpret survey psychometrics, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35.
MezirowJ (1991) Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
MohringP (1999) Andragogy and pedagogy: A comment on their erroneous usage (Training and Development Research Center Project No 21)St Paul, MN: Department of Vocational and Technical Education, Minnesota University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED 305 509).
PomerantzEAltermattESaxonJ (2002) ‘Making the grade but feeling distressed: Gender differences in academic performance and internal distress’, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol 94(2), pp 396–404.
RachalJ (1994) Andragogical and pedagogical methods compared: A review of the experimental literature (Report). Hattiesburg: University of Southern Mississippi. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 380 566).
41.
ScetcovD (2000) ‘The virtual classroom vs. the real one’, Forbes, vol 166(7), pp 3–5.
42.
TaylorS (2002) The tending instinct. New York: Henry Holt.
