Engineering education agencies worldwide echo the need of graduating engineers to be aware of the societal context of engineering. Service learning is a viable pedagogy that can bring students to understand this dimension in a rather direct way. Undergraduate engineering students visited low-income households in their community and installed insulation materials on doors and windows, thereby reducing heating costs. The students calculated the resulting dollar amount of energy savings using heat transfer principles. A quantitative analyses of the reflections of the students clearly showed that they became more aware and sensitive to their roles as engineers in a societal context.
PascailL., ‘The emergence of the skills approach in companies and its consequences for the training of engineers’, European J. Enging. Educ., 31(1) (2006), 55–61.
2.
RavesteijnW.de GraaffE.KroesenO., ‘Engineering the future: The social necessity of communicative engineers’, European J. Enging. Educ., 31(1) (2006), 63–71.
3.
GanaM. T. SantanderFuentesL. A. Trejo, ‘Technology as “a human practice with social meaning”. A new scenery for engineering education’, European J. Enging. Educ., 31(4) (2006), 437–447.
4.
DowlingD., ‘Designing a competency based program to facilitate the progression of experienced engineering technologists to professional engineer status’, European J. Enging. Educ., 31(1) (2006), 95–107.
5.
BalesV., ‘Influence of long-term societal trends on technical education’, Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Engineering Education: Mobility of Engineers (Budapest, Hungary, 2006), 316–319.
6.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs (ABET, Baltimore, MD, 2004).
7.
National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century (National Academic, Washington, DC, 2004).
8.
JawaharlalM.FanU. J.MonemiS., ‘Implementing service-learning in engineering curriculum’, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (Chicago, IL, 2006), no. 2614.
9.
SelingoJ., ‘May I help you?’, PRISM, American Society of Engineering Education, 15(9) (2006), 41–45.
10.
Al-KhafajiK.MorseM. C., ‘Learning sustainable design through service’, Int. J. Service-Learning Enging., 1(1) (2006), 1–10.
11.
CoyleE. J.JamiesonL. H.OaksW. C., ‘Integrating engineering education and community service: Themes for the future of engineering education’, J. Enging. Educ., 95(1) (2006), 7–11.
12.
SlivovskyL. A.DeRegoF. R.JamiesonL. H.OaksW. C., ‘Developing the reflection component in the EPICS model of engineering service-learning’, Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (2003), S1B14–19.
13.
TsangE.van HaneghanJ.JohnsonB.NewmanE. J.van EckS., ‘A report on service-learning and engineering design: Service-learning's effect on students learning engineering design in “introduction to mechanical engineering”’, Int. J. Enging. Educ., 17(1) (2001), 30–39.
14.
TsangE., ‘Using assessment to develop service-learning reflection course materials’, Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (2002), F2A15–19.
15.
HubandF. L., ‘Service with a smile’, PRISM, American Society of Engineering Education, 15(9) (2006), 5.
16.
MulrineA., ‘To the rescue’, PRISM, American Society of Engineering Education, 15(7) (2006), 28–33.
17.
WeissJ.GeorgeC.WalkerJ., ‘Redesigning an appropriate technology shredder for manufacture in a developing country’, Int. J. Service-Learning Enging., 1(1) (2006), 11–26.
18.
RosJ.LeeC.BruceM.FanC.QuanR.PaiH., ‘A portable and sustainable computer education project for developing countries – phase I’, Int. J. Service-Learning Enging., 1(1) (2006), 27–47.
SlivovskyL. A.DeRegoF. R.ZoltowskiC. B.JamiesonL. H.OaksW. C., ‘An analysis of the reflection component in the EPICS model of engineering service-learning’, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (2004), session 3161.
