The usual textbook approach to Galerkin's method can be misleading, and fails to highlight all the possible errors that arise in an approximation scheme. A general weighted residual is presented that explicitly excludes all possible errors. Thus all the inherent approximations are made transparent to students. The conventional form of Galerkin's method is shown to be just one particular case of this method.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LivesleyR. K., Finite Elements: An Introduction for Engineers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.
2.
BeckerE. B.CareyG. F., and OdenJ. T., Finite Elements: An Introduction, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1981.
3.
MikhlinS. G., Variational Methods in Mathematical Physics, Pergamon Press, New York, 1963.
4.
FinlaysonB. A., The Method of Weighted Residuals and Variational Principles, Academic Press, New York, 1972.
5.
StakgoldI., Green's Functions and Boundary Value Problems, Wiley—Interscience, New York, 1979.
6.
StrangG., and FixG. J., An Analysis of the Finite Element Method, Prentice Hall, Englewood, Cliffs, NJ, 1973.
7.
AmesW. F., Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 3rd edn, Academic Press, New York, 1992.
8.
MohrG. A., Finite Elements for Solids, Fluids and Optimization, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992.
9.
CookR. D.MalkusD. S., and PleshaM. E., Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 3rd edn, John Wiley, New York, 1989.
10.
CrandallS. H., Engineering Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956.
11.
DaviesA. J., The Finite Element Method: A First Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1980.
