Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper presents a five-semester experience regarding the use of a real Internet-scale environment for testing protocols and services under realistic conditions. The paper discusses the convenience of using such real environments over other alternatives, i.e. emulated or simulated environments. Since most currently published work focuses primarily on technical specifications of academic testing environments, the paper also argues for the need to carry out studies which analyse students' opinions, performance, and behaviours while using these environments. Accordingly, an exhaustive survey analysis is included. This first analysis is complemented with a second one regarding the way students interact with the system. From both studies, several conclusions and recommendations are derived.

Keywords

computer-supported collaborative learning educational data analysis higher education Internet-based education Internet-scale systems protocol-testing environments telecommunications engineering

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Calvo

Marcos

Orive

and Sarachaga

, ‘Building complex remote learning laboratories’, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 18 (2010), 53–66.

Albrecht

Tuttle

Snoeren

A. C.

and Vahdat

, ‘PlanetLab application management using plush’, SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 40 (1) (2006), 33–40.

Marquès

J. M.

Lázaro

Juan

Vilajosana

Domingo

and Jorba

, ‘PlanetLab@UOC: A Real Lab over the Internet to experiment with Distributed Systems’, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2010 (doi: 10.1002/cae.20468).

Kayssi

Sharafeddine

and Karaki

, ‘Computer-based laboratory for data communications and computer networking’, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 12 (2004), 84–97.

Martínez-Caro

, ‘Factors affecting effectiveness in e-learning: An analysis in production management courses’, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2009 (doi: 10.1002/cae.20337).

Benigno

and Trentin

, ‘The evaluation of online courses’, J. Computer Assisted Learning, 16 (2000), 259–270.

Leonini

Riviére

and Felber

, ‘SPLAY: Distributed systems evaluation made simple (or how to turn ideas into live systems in a breeze)’, in Proc. 6th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 2009, pp. 185–198.

Ivica

Ridley

and Shubert

, ‘StarHPC — Teaching parallel programming within elastic compute cloud’, in Proc. 31st Int. Conf. on Information Technology Interfaces (ITI 2009), 2009, pp. 353–356.

Vahdat

Yocum

Mahadevan

Kostic

Chase

and Becker

, ‘Scalability and accuracy in a large-scale network emulator’, in Proc. 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 2002, pp. 271–284.

10.

White

Lepreau

Stoller

Ricci

Guruprasad

Newbold

Hibler

Barb

and Joglekar

, ‘Netbed: An integrated experimental environment’, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 32(3) (2002), 27.

11.

Juan

Daradoumis

Faulin

and Xhafa

, ‘A data analysis model based on control charts to monitor online learning processes’, Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Mining, 4 (2009), 159–174.

12.

Zirkle

, ‘Distance education in career and technical education: A review of the research literature’, J. Vocat. Educ. Res., 28 (2003), 151–171.

13.

Juan

Daradoumis

Faulin

and Xhafa

, ‘SAMOS: A model for monitoring students' and groups' activity in collaborative e-learning’, Int. J. Learning Technology, 4(1/2) (2009), 53–72.

Using a Real Internet-Scale Environment for Protocol Testing in Undergraduate Courses: Students' Behaviour and Feedback

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References