Based on deployment throughout a term, this paper suggests the potential of a computer-based approach to promote learner awareness of their knowledge states. We consider in particular the extent to which students are interested in finding out about their misconceptions in the context of independent study. It was found that many first-year students held misconceptions in introductory electrical circuits and mathematics courses at some stage of their learning, and most viewed information about their misconceptions to assist them in identifying their problems. We suggest, therefore, that an approach of highlighting an individual's misconceptions can be found useful by students to help them recognise their knowledge, difficulties and misconceptions to support self-assessment and facilitate their identification of an appropriate focus of their efforts, to meet their learning needs.
BrnaP., ‘Confronting misconceptions in the domain of simple electrical circuits’, Instructional Science, 17(1) (1988), 29–55.
2.
ChangK.-E.LiuS.-H.ChenS.W., ‘A testing system for diagnosing misconceptions in d.c. electric circuits’, Computers Educ., 31 (1998), 195–210.
3.
CohenR.EylonB.GanielU., ‘Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students' concepts’, Am. J. Phys., 51(5) (1983), 407–412.
4.
EngelhardtP. V.BeichnerR. J., ‘Students' understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits’, Am. J. Phys.72(1) (2004), 98–115.
5.
NasrR.HallS. R.GarikP., ‘Student misconceptions in signals and systems and their origins’, 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO, 2003 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2003), pp. 23–28.
6.
GarfieldJ.AhlgrenA., ‘Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: Implications for research’, J. Res. Maths Educ., 19(1) (1988), 44–63.
7.
GibsonI. R.GoldmanF. H.GrinfeldM., ‘Mathematics at the school-university interface in Scotland’, Research Report Number 7: 2005 (Department of Mathematics, University of Strathclyde, 2005).
8.
GraeberA. O.TiroshD.GloverR., ‘Preservice teachers' misconceptions in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division’, J. Res. Maths Educ., 20(1) (1989), 95–102.
MullerD. A.BewesJ.SharmaM. D.ReimannP., ‘Saying the wrong thing: Improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions’, J. Computer Assisted Learning24 (2007), 144–155.
11.
BullS., ‘Supporting learning with Open Learner Models’, in Proc. 4th Hellenic Conf. on Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens, 29 Sept–4 Oct, 2004, pp. 47–61.
12.
BullS.QuigleyS.MabbottA., ‘Computer-based formative assessment to promote reflection and learner autonomy’, Engineering Education: Journal of the Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre1(1) (2006), 8–18.
WoodfordK.BancroftP., ‘Multiple choice questions not considered harmful’, in Proc. 7th Australasian Conference on Computing Education (volume 42) (ACM International Conference Proceedings Series, Vol. 106, 2005), pp. 109–116.
15.
MabbottA.BullS., ‘Alternative views on knowledge: Presentation of Open Learner Models’, in LesterJ.C.VicariR.M.ParaguacuF. (Eds), Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 7th International Conference (Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 689–698.
16.
Perez-MarinD.Pascual-NietoI.AlfonsecaE.RodriguezP., ‘Automatically generated inspect-able learning models for students’, in LuckinR.KoedingerK. R.GreerJ. (Eds), Artificial Intelligence in Education (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2007), pp. 632–634.
17.
KayJ., ‘Learner know thyself: Student models to give learner control and responsibility’, in HalimZ.OttomannT.RazakZ. (Eds), Proc. Intl Conf. on Computers in Education (Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education, Chesapeake, VA, 1997), pp. 17–24.
18.
MitrovicA.MartinB., ‘Evaluating the effect of Open Student Models on self-assessment’, Intl J. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(2) (2007), 121–144.
19.
WeberG.BrusilovskyP., ‘ELM-ART: An adaptive versatile system for web-based instruction’, Intl J. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12 (2001), 351–384.
20.
BullS.MabbottA.GardnerP.JacksonT.LancasterM.QuigleyS.ChildsP. A., ‘Supporting interaction preferences and recognition of misconceptions with independent Open Learner Models’, in NeijdlW.KayJ.PuP.HerderE. (Eds), Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (Springer, Berlin, 2008), pp. 62–72.
21.
ShahrourG.BullS., ‘Does “Notice” prompt noticing? Raising awareness in language learning with an Open Learner Model’, in NeijdlW.KayJ.PuP.HerderE. (Eds), Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (Springer, Berlin, 2008), pp. 173–182.
22.
Engineering and Technology Board, ‘Engineering UK 2006’, Research Report, (2006).
