This paper reports on the implementation of problem-based learning (PBL) in an undergraduate electronic engineering degree programme. Initially, there is a review of literature to explore the claims made about the benefits of PBL and how these informed the development of our PBL course. This is followed by a description of the course and an explanation of our case study approach. We detail and discuss our findings in relation to theory and the development process, and conclude that from our experience PBL performs well as an adjunct to traditional teaching when considered in the context of the teaching of electronic engineering.
EntwistleN.NisbetJ.BromageA., Electronic Engineering: Subject Overview Report, ETL Project, December 2005. Available at www.ed.ac.uk/etl
2.
BecherT.TrowlerP., Academic Tribes and Territories, 2nd edn (SRHE/Open University Press, Buckingham, 2001).
3.
Association of Graduate Recruiters, Graduate Skills for the 21st Century (Association of Graduate Recruiters, Cambridge, 1995).
4.
IEE IWP, Institution for Electrical Engineers Working Group Report (IEE, London, n.d.)
5.
BarrowsH. S.TamblynR. M., Problem-based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education (Springer, New York, 1980).
6.
Savin-BadenM., Problem-based Learning in Higher Education: Untold Stories, (SRHE/Open University Press, Buckingham, 2000).
7.
HutchingsB.O'RourkeK., ‘Evaluating learning change: How 3rd year English literature students adapt to problem-based learning’, presented at SEDA/SRHE Conference, Bristol, 2003.
MartonF.SaljoR., ‘Approaches to learning’, in MartonF.HounsellD.EntwistleN. (Eds), The Experience of Learning (Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, 1984), pp. 36–55.
12.
MeyerJ. H. F.LandR. (2003), ‘Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines’. Paper presented at the 10th International Symposium on Improving Student Learning: Theory and Practice – 10 years on.
13.
WagerW.GagnéR. M., Designing computer-aided instruction, in JonassenD. (Ed), Instructional Designs for Microcomputer Courseware (Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, 1988).
14.
BiggsJ., Teaching for Quality Learning at University (SRHE/Open University Press, Buckingham, 1999).
BaillieC.DewulfS.WalkerP.EltonL., ‘Implementing “creativity” in an educational context’, in DewulfS.BaillieC. (Eds), CASE: Creativity in Art, Science and Engineering: How to foster creativity (DfEE, London, 1999).
17.
EltonL., ‘A challenge to established assessment practice’, Higher Educ. Quarterly, 58(1) (2004), 43–62.
18.
KnightP. T. (2002), ‘Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray’, Studies Higher Educ., 27(3) (2002), 275–286.
19.
NewmanM., A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of Problem Based Learning, Special Report 2 (LTSN 01, Newcastle upon Tyne, n.d.). Available at http://www.medev.ac.uk/docs/pbl_report.pdf; accessed 19 March 2007.
20.
MitchellJ.SmithJ.KenyonA. J. (2005), ‘ “It's not for lazy students like me …”’, Int. J. Elect. Enging Educ., 42(1) (2005), 41–51.
21.
LandR., Educational Development: Discourse, Identity and Practice (SRHE/Open University Press, Buckingham, 2004).
22.
OliverM.ConoleG., ‘Evidence-based practice and e-learning in higher education: Can we and should we?’Research Papers in Education, 18(4) (2003), 385–397.
23.
GommR., Social Research Methodology: A Critical Introduction (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2004).
24.
McNiffJ., Action Research: Principles and Practice (Routledge, London, 1988).
25.
NisbetJ.EntwistleN.McQuillinB.RobinsonI., ‘Staff and student perceptions of the teaching-learning environment: A case study’, Int. J. Elect. Enging Educ., 42(1) (2005), 30–40.
26.
EltonL., ‘Strategies to enhance learner motivation: A conceptual analysis’, Studies in Higher Educ., 21(1) (1996), 57–68.
27.
WindschitlM., ‘Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural and political challenges facing teachers’, Rev. Educ. Res., 72(2) (2002), 131–175.
JaquesD., Learning in Groups: A Handbook for Improving Group Work, 3rd edn. (Kogan Page, London, 2000).
30.
KahnP., Developing Your Teaching (Key Guides for Effective Teaching in Higher Education) (Routledge, London, 2006).
31.
JonesC., ‘From the sage on the stage to what exactly? Description and the place of the moderator in cooperative and collaborative learning’, Assoc. Learning Tech. J., 7(2) (1999), 27–36.
