This paper comprises part of the work of the Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses project (Project web site http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl). The emphasis is on the content of a course unit, and in particular on the effect of the choice of learning aids deployed on students' attitudes to the course unit.
McCuneV. and ReimannN., ‘The Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses project: Some initial reflections and observations’, paper presented at the 10th Improving Student learning Symposium, Brussels, 6 September 2002.
2.
MeyerJ. H. F. and LandR., ‘Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (1): Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines’, paper presented at the 10th Improving Student Learning Symposium, Brussels, 6 September 2002.
3.
PerkinsD. N., ‘The many faces of constructivism’, Educational Leadership, 57(3) (1999), pp. 6–11.
4.
WengerE., ‘Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity’ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
5.
RobinsonI. and BramhallM., ‘The Engineering professional: Education or formation?’, joint inaugural lecture, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK, 2001.
6.
BiggsJ., ‘Aligning the curriculum to promote good learning: The idea and ideals of constructive alignment’, presentation, Constructive Alignment in Action: An Imaginative Curriculum Symposium, London, 4 November 2002 (accessed at http://www.ltsn.ac.uk/genericcentre/index.asp?id=17269 August 2004).
7.
SmithD. W., PIC in Practice: An Introduction to the PIC Microcontroller (Butterworth-Heinemann, London, 2002).
8.
HettA. and SchubertT., ‘The mobile hardware lab’, paper presented at the 2nd Global Virtual Learning and Higher Education Conference, Mansfield College, Oxford, 12–13 September 2003 (abstract accessed at http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/vlhe03s5.htm, August 2004).
