In order to support students with a wide range of attainment expectations, within a common first year of a range of engineering programmes, intending learning outcomes have been set out in detail at different levels and support mechanisms put in place to help them plan their own learning targets.
Standards And Routes To Registration (SARTOR), 3rd Edition, Engineering Council1997, http://www.engc.org.uk/sartor/, CEng Section 4.1.1., para. 16.
2.
BiggsJohn, Teaching for Quality Learning at University (Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham, 1999).
3.
Sparkes, Assessment Methods in Engineering Degree Courses, Engineering Professors' Conference Occasional Paper No. 5, December 1992.
4.
LaurillardD., Rethinking University Teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology (Routledge, London, 1993).
5.
EntwistleNoel, Styles of Learning and Teaching (David Fulton, London, 1998).
6.
RamsdenPaul, Learning to Teach in Higher Education (Routledge, London, 1992), chapter 5, p. 81.
7.
ProsserM. and TrigwellK., Understanding Learning and Teaching, on deep and surface learning (Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Buckingham, 1999), chapter 4.
8.
MartonF. and BoothS., Learning and Awareness (Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1997), chapter 2.
9.
KolbDavid A., Experiential Learning (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1984).
10.
HoughtonA. W. and DunneE., ‘Strategies for teaching mixed-attainment groups in engineering education’, International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 37 (1) (2000), 48–66.
