While textual analysis provides a useful tool for examining archive screen performances, purely immanent readings often ignore the contextualising factors which help shape them; this article therefore sets out to examine the various determinants of television acting and how they have changed between the live, multi-camera studio era and the present day. The various factors considered include: the time period allocated to produce a television drama, and how it is utilised; production process and technology; the role of the television director; and actor experience and training. Taken together, these determinants offer the potential for a fuller understanding of television acting.
BlumRichardA.1984. American Film Acting: The Stanislavski Heritage. Ann Arbor, Michigan: UMI.
6.
CaughieJohn. 2000. Television Drama: Realism, Modernism, And British Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
CarnickeSharonMarie. 1984. ‘Lee Strasberg's Paradox Of The Actor’. In Screen Acting, edited by LovellAlanKramerPeter, 75–87. London: Routledge.
8.
CarnickeSharonMarie. 2004. ‘Screen Performance And Directors' Visions’. In More Than A Method: Trends And Traditions In Contemporary Film Performance, edited by BaronCynthiaCarsonDianeFrankP. Tomasulo, 42–70. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
9.
CarnickeSharonMarie. 2006. ‘The Material Poetry Of Acting: “Objects Of Attention”, Performance Style, And Gender In The Shining And Eyes Wide Shut. Journal Of Film And Video58 (1): 21–30.
10.
CookeLez. 2003. British Television Drama: A History. London: BFI.
HarperGraeme. 2007. Calling The Shots: Directing The New Series of Doctor Who. London: Reynolds & Hearn.
14.
GilbertGerard. 2010. ‘Right On Cue’. The Independent On Sunday, 7 November, 10–8.
15.
HewettRichard. 2013. Acting In The New World: Studio And Location Realism In Survivors’. The Journal Of British Cinema And Television10 (2): 321–39.
16.
HewettRichard. (2014). ‘Spaces Of Preparation: The Acton ‘Hilton’ And Changing Patterns Of Television Drama Rehearsal’. The Historical Journal Of Film, Radio And Television34 (3): 331–44.
17.
JacobsJason. 2000. The Intimate Screen: Early British Television Drama. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
KlevanAndrew. 2005. Film Performance: From Achievement to Appreciation. London: Wallflower Press.
19.
McNaughtonDouglas. 2014. ‘Constipated, Studio-bound, Wall-confined, Rigid’: The Influence Of British Actors' Equity On BBC Television Drama, 1948–72’. The British Journal Of Cinema And Television11 (1): 1–22.
20.
NaremoreJames. 1988. Acting in the Cinema. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
National Council for Drama Training (NCDT). 2002. Report Of The Recorded Media Working Party. Pearson, Roberta. 1990. ‘“O'er Step Not The Modesty of Nature”: A Semiotic Approach To Acting In The Griffiths Biographs’. In Making Visible The Invisible: An Anthology Of Original Essays On Film Acting, edited by ZuckerCarole. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press.
22.
PudovkinVsevolod. 1953. ‘Stanislavski's System In The Cinema’. Sight And Sound22 (3): 115–18, 147–8.
23.
RADA. 1959. Prospectus 1959. London: RADA.
24.
RADA. 1988. Prospectus 1988/89. London: RADA.
25.
RawlinsTrevor. 2010. ‘Screen Acting And Performance Choices’. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MECCSA Postgraduate Network3 (2): 1–27.
26.
RedgraveMichael. 1970. ‘The Stanislavski Myth’. originally published in New Theatre3 (1): 1946, reprinted in Toby Cole, and Helen Krich Chinoy, Actors On Acting: The Theories, Techniques And Practices Of The World's Great Actors, Told In Their Own Words. New York: Crown Publishers Inc., 403–8.
27.
SandersonMichael. 1984. From Irving To Olivier: A Social History Of The Acting Profession In England 1880–1983. London: The Athlone Press.
