One of the main missions of a national library is to preserve the national creative works in printed and non-printed formats. In the 1990s, national libraries began to harvest and archive the national body of creative work that was published on the internet. The aim of the study was to examine to what extent national libraries implement their general collection policy when they establish a national web archive. The study, which was based on a qualitative approach, had three phases: examining the characteristics of a traditional collection policy of a national library; identifying the characteristics of a collection policy of a national library's web archive; and comparing the traditional collection characteristics with the national library's web archive characteristics. The results showed that although the libraries that were studied were from different regions of the world and various cultures, the characteristics of their traditional collections are similar. In contrast, the difference between their web archives is more significant. National libraries do not apply the traditional policy to the internet, and struggle to shape new rules for coping with web contents.
BrownA. (2006) Archiving websites: A practical guide for information management professionals. London: Facet.
3.
BrygfjeldS. A. (2002) ‘Access to Web archives: The Nordic Web Archive Access Project approach’. (Electronic version). Zeitschrift fur bibliothekswesen und bibliographic, 49(4), pp.227–231.
4.
CollinsJ.FinerR. (1982) National acquisition policies and systems: A comparative study of existing systems and possible models. Wetherby: IFLA International Office for UAP.
DayM. (2003b) ‘Preserving the fabric of our lives: A survey of Web preservation initiatives’. (Electronic version). Research and advanced technology for digital libraries, Book series: Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. 2769, pp. 461–472.
8.
GomesD.FreitasS.SilvaM. (2006) ‘Design and selection criteria for a National Web Archive’. (Electronic version). Research and advanced technology for digital libraries, Book series: Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. 4172, pp. 196–207.
9.
HakalaJ. (2004) ‘Archiving the Web: European experiences’. Program: Electronic library and information systems, 38(3), pp. 176–183. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?contentType=Arti cleandFilename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/2800380304. html (visited 20.9.08).
LamposC.EirinakiM.JevtuchovaD.VazirgiannisM. (2004) ‘Archiving the Greek web’. Proceedings of the 4th International Web Archiving Workshop (IWAW ‘04). http://iwaw.europarchive.org/04/Lampos.pdf (visited 29.4.09).
National Library of Australia (2003) ‘Balanced scorecard initiative 49: Collecting Australian online publications’, http://pandora.nla.gov.au/bsc49.doc (visited 21.1.09).
PhillipsM. (2005) ‘What should we preserve? The question for heritage libraries in a digital world’. (Electronic version). Library Trends, 54(1), pp. 57–71.
27.
PriestH.RobertsP.WoodsL. (2002), ‘An overview of three different approaches to the interpretation of qualitative data’. Nurse Researcher, 10(1), part 2, pp. 44–51.
28.
ShkediA. (2003) Milim hamenasot lagaat. Mehkar eithutani teorya veyisum. (Words that try to touch: Qualitative research, theory and application). Ramot Publishing Company. Tel-Aviv University. (In Hebrew).
State Library of Tasmania (2009) ‘Guidelines for selecting, archiving and preserving websites pertinent to Tasmanian government information and cultural heritage’, http://odi.statelibrary.tas.gov.au/About/selpolicy.asp (visited 18.3.09).
31.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1998) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
