The purpose of this paper is to assess and compare regional welfare costs associated with alternative multi-gas strategies for a stabilization of global greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions in the long run. Mitigation costs of non-CO2 greenhouse gases are integrated into a multi-region multi-country CGE model of the world economy. Calibrations are based on GHG emissions projections from, and marginal abatement cost curves provided by, the EMF21 working group for the six greenhouse gases. We find that the introduction of non-CO2 GHGs in the mitigation strategy reduces significantly the welfare cost of a long term emissions stabilization policy but that benefits vary across regions. We also find that the various possible rules of emission quotas allocation may have large effects on the burden sharing among regions.
BabikerM.CriquiP.EllermanD.ReillyJ.ViguierL. (2003). “Assessing the Impact of Carbon Tax Differentiation in the European Union.” Environmental Modeling &Assessment8(3): 187-197.
2.
BabikerM.EckausR.S. (2002). “Rethinking the Kyoto Emissions Targets.” Climatic Change54(4): 399-414.
3.
BabikerM.ReillyJ.ViguierL. (2004). “Is International Emission Trading Always Beneficial?” The Energy Journal25(2): 33-56.
4.
BabikerM.ReillyJ.M.JacobyH.D. (2000). “The Kyoto Protocol and Developing Countries.” Energy Policy28(8): 525-536.
5.
BarrettS. (1990). “The Problem of Global Environmental Protection.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy6(10): 68-79.
6.
BarrettS. (1997). “The Strategy of Trade Sanctions in International Environmental Agreements.” Resource and Energy Economics19: 345-61.
7.
BaumertK.A.BlanchardO.LlosaS.PerkausJ.F. (Ed.) (2002). Building on the Kyoto Protocol: Options for Protecting the Climate: World Resources Institute, Washington D.C.BernardA.HaurieA.VielleM.ViguierL.(2002). “A Two-level Dynamic Game of Carbon Emissions Trading Between Russia, China, and Annex B Countries.” Working Paper 11, NCCR-WP4, Geneva, September.
8.
BernardA.PaltsevS.ReillyJ.M.VielleM.ViguierL. (2003). “Russia’s Role in the Kyoto Protocol.” Report 98, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge MA, June. Bernard, A. and M. Vielle (1998). “La structure du modele GEMINI-E3.” Economie &Pre-vision 5(136).
9.
BernardA.VielleM. (1999). “Efficient Allocation of a Global Environment Cost Between Countries: Tradable Permits versus Taxes or Tradable Permits and Taxes? An Appraisal with a World General Equilibrium Model.” Working Paper.
10.
BernardA.VielleM. (2002). “Does Non Ratification of the Kyoto Protocol by the US Increase the Likelihood of Monopolistic Behavior by Russia in the Market of Tradable Permits?” Working Paper.
11.
BernardA.VielleM. (2003). “Measuring the Welfare Cost of Climate Change Policies: A Comparative Assessment Based on the Computable General Equilibrium Model GEMINI-E3.” Environmental Modeling &Assessment8(3): 199-217.
12.
BlanchardO.CriquiP.KitousA.ViguierL. (2003). “Combining Effciency With Equity: A Pragmatic Approach,” chapter in KaulI.ConceicaoP.Le GoulvenK.MendozaR. U. (Ed.), Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization: 280-303. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13.
BohringerC.LoschelA. (2003). “Climate Policy Beyond Kyoto: Quo Vadis?” ZEW Discussion paper 03-09.
14.
CarraroC.SiniscalcoD. (1996). “R&D Cooperation and the Stability of International Environmental Agreements,” In CarraroC(Ed.), International Environmental Negotiations. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15.
CriquiP.MimaS.ViguierL. (1999). “Marginal Abatement Costs of CO2 Emission Reductions, Geographical Flexibility and Concrete Ceilings: An Assessment Using the POLES Model.” Energy Policy27(10): 585-602.
16.
DeAngeloB.de la ChesnayeF.BeachR.SommerA.MurrayB. (2007). “Methane and Nitrous Oxide Mitigation in Agriculture.” Energy Journal, This issue.
17.
DelhotalC.de la ChesnayeF.GardinerA.BatesJ.SankovskiA. (2007). “Mitigation of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emission from Waste, Energy and Industry.” Energy Journal, This issue.
18.
Energy Information Administration (2003). International Energy Outlook. EIA/DOE, Washington D.C.
19.
FerrisM.C.MunsonT.S. (2000). “Complementarity Problems in GAMS and the PATH Solver.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control24: 165-188.
20.
FerrisM.C.PangJ.S. (1997). Complementarity and Variational Problems: State of the Art. SIAM Publications, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
21.
GermainM.TointP.TulkensH.de ZeewA. (1998). “Transfers to Sustain Core-Theoretic Cooperation in International Stock Pollutant Control.” discussion paper 9832, CORE.
22.
GermainM.Van YperseleJ.-P. (1999). “Financial Transfers to Sustain International Cooperation in the Climate Change Framework.” discussion paper 9936, CORE.
23.
GrubbM. (1995). “Seeking Fair Weather: Ethics and the International Debate on Climate Change.” International Affairs71(3): 463-96.
24.
HertelT.W..(1997). Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25.
HymanR.ReillyJ.BabikerM.De MasinA.JacobyH. (2003). “Modeling Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Abatement.” Environmental Modeling and Assessment8(3): 175-186.
26.
International Energy Agency (2002a). Energy Balances for non-OECD Countries. OECD/IEA, Paris.
27.
International Energy Agency (2002b). Energy Balances for OECD Countries. OECD/IEA, Paris.
28.
ManneA.RichelsR. (2001). “An Alternative Approach to Establishing Trade-offs Among Greenhouse Gases.” Nature410: 675-677.
29.
OttingerD.GodwinD.HarnischJ. (2007). “Estimating Future Emissions and Potential Reductions of HFCs, PFCs and SF6.” Energy Journal, This issue.
30.
ReillyJ.PrinnR.HarnischJ.FitzmauriceJ.JacobyH.KicklighterD.MelilloJ.StoneP.SokolovA.WangC. (1999). “Multi-Gas Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol.” Nature401: 549-555.
31.
ScheehleE.KrugerD. (2007). “Global Anthropogenic Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions.” Energy Journal, This issue.
32.
SohngenB.SedjoR. (2007). “Carbon Sequestration Cost in Global Forest.” Energy Journal, This issue.
33.
TolR. S. J.WietzeL.van der Zwaan B. (2000). “Technology Diffusion and the Stability of Climate Coalitions.” Nota di lavoro 20.2000, FEEM.
34.
ViguierL. (2004). “A Proposal to Increase Developing Country Participation in International Climate Policy.” Environmental Science &Policy7(3), Issue 3: 195-204.
35.
ViguierL.VielleM.HaurieA.BernardA. (2006). “A Two-Level Computable Equilibrium Model to Assess the Strategic Allocation of Emission Allowances Within the European Union.” Computers &Operations Research33(2): 369-385.
