This paper summarizes the main features of a linked CGE-MARKAL model system capable of simulating the macro-level economy and micro-level technology detail of the transport sector. Emphasis is given to issues of calibration of such a hybrid system, with references provided to already published papers based on this research for coverage of other details.
BabikerM.ReillyJ.MeyerM.EckausR.Sue WingI.HymanR. (2001). The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Revisions, Sensitivities, and Comparisons of Results, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 71, February.
2.
Ben-AkivaM.LermanS.R. (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press.
3.
BohringerC. (1998). “The Synthesis of Bottom-up and Top-down in Energy Policy Modeling. Energy Economics 20: 233-248.
4.
Charles River Associates (1997). Economic Implications of the Adoption of Limits on Carbon Emissions from Industrialized Countries. Report prepared for the American Automobile Manufacturers, Washington DC.
5.
GreeneD.L.PattersonP.D.SinghM.LiJ. (2005). “Feebates, Rebates and Gas-guzzler Taxes: A Study of Incentives for Increased Fuel Economy.” Energy Policy33(6): 757-775.
6.
HertelT. (1997). Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press, UK.
7.
HorneT.JaccardM.TiedemannK.(2005). “Improving Behavioral Realism in Hybrid En-ergy-economy Models Using Discrete Choice Studies of Personal Transportation Decisions. Energy Economics 27(1): 59-77.
8.
Kelly Blue Book Marketing Research and Harris Interactive Market Research (2004). The Auto VIBES Report. September2004 Results.
9.
KypreosS. (1996). The MARKAL-MACRO Model and the Climate Change. Paul Scherrer Institute, PSI Bericht Nr., 96-14, July.
10.
ManneA.RichelsR. (1992). Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emission Limits. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
11.
MessnerS.SchrattenholzerL. (2000). “MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an Energy Supply Model with a Macroeconomic Module and Solving it Iteratively . Energy 25: 267-282.
12.
McFarlandJ.ReillyJ.HerzogH. (2004). “Representing Energy Technologies in Top-Down Models Using Bottom-Up Information.” Energy Economics26: 685-707.
13.
National Research Council (2000). Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards. The National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.
14.
SchaferA.Victorand D., (2000). The future mobility of world population, Transportation Research (Part A), 34(3):171-205.
15.
SchaferAJacobyH.D..(2005). “Technology Detail in a Multi-Sector CGE Model: Transport under Climate Policy.” Energy Economics27(1): 1-24.
16.
SchaferAJacobyH.D..(2006). “Vehicle Technology Dynamics under CO2-Constraint: A General Equilibrium Analysis.” Energy Policy34(9): 975-985.
17.
ZahaviY. (1981). The UMOT-Urban Interactions. DOT-RSPA-DPB 10/7, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
