Exports of Canadian natural gas hasten the day when Canadians must pay higher gas prices. Hence the desirability of exporting natural gas is strongly affected by current and future supply costs. In this paper I analyze the interaction of Canadian gas exports, domestic gas prices, and future gas supply costs using a multitemporal nonlinear optimization model of natural gas allocation. Maximizing the present value of Canadian consumer plus producer surplus and net revenues from export sales, this model allows for the spatial dispersion of gas reserves and domestic markets, the spatial dispersion of U.S. markets, differing recovery profiles for different supply options, and rising marginal costs of conventional gas supplies.
BohiD. R. (1981). Analyzing Demand Behavior: A Study of Energy Elasticities. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
ChaoH. (1981). “Exhaustible Resource Models: The Value of Information.” Operations Research29 (September-October): 903-23
3.
DanielT. E.GoldbergH. M. (1981). “Dynamic Equilibrium Modeling: The Canadian BALANCE Model.” Operations Research29 (September-October).
4.
DanielT. E.GoldbergH. M. (1982). “A Note on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources under Production Capacity Constraints.” Operations Research Letters1 (September): 126-28
5.
DanielT. E.GoldbergH. M.WeyantJ. P. (1984). “Canadian Natural Gas Exports to the United States: A Monopolistic Intertemporal Analysis.” The Energy Journal5 (4): 21-24.
E.P.I. Resources Ltd. (1980). “Offshore Gas Development Study.” Calgary: E.P.I. Resources Ltd., unpublished technical report.
8.
FullerJ. D.SchwartzS. L.ZiembaW. T. (1982). “Energy Self-Sufficiency and Export Possibilities for Canada: 1980-2030,” In AmitRAvrielM., eds., Perspectives on Resource Modeling: Energy and Minerals. Cambridge. Mass.: Ballinger Publishing.
9.
HelliwellJ. F. (1980). “Trade Policies for Natural Gas and Electricity,” In Energy Policies for the 1980s, Volume 2. Ontario: Ontario Economic Council special research report.
10.
ManneA. S. (1974). “Waiting for the Breeder.” Review of Economic Studies. Symposium on the Economics of Natural Resources.
11.
ManneA. S. (1976). “ETA: A Model for Energy Technology Assessment.” Bell Journal of Economics7 (Autumn): 379-406.
12.
ManneA. S. (1979). “ETA-MACRO: A Model of Energy-Economy Interactions,” In R. S. Pindyck, ed„ Advances in the Economics of Energy and Resources. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, p. 209.
13.
MurtaghB. A.SaundersM. A. (1983). “MINOS 5.0 User's Guide.” Technical report SOL 83-20. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Department of Operations Research.
14.
National Energy Board of Canada (1979). “Reasons for Decision:November1979.” Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada, Appendix F.
15.
National Energy Board of Canada (1981). “Canadian Energy: Supply and Demand 1980-2000.” Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
16.
National Energy Board of Canada (1984a). “Workshop on Benefit-Cost Analysis in Energy Economics.” Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
17.
National Energy Board of Canada (1984b). “Canadian Energy: Supply and Demand 1983-2005.” Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada, technical report.
18.
National Energy Board of Canada (1984c). “Board Staff Notes on the Estimation of the Social Cost of Canadian Natural Gas.” Ottawa: NEB of Canada, unpublished technical report.
19.
NordhausW.D.(1973). “The Allocation of Energy Resources.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity3: 529-79.
20.
NordhausW. D. (1979). The Efficient Use of Energy Resources. Cowles Foundation Monograph 26. New Haven: Yale University Press.
21.
Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States (1985). “U.S. Natural Gas Availability: Gas Supply Through the Year 2000.” Technical Report OTA-E-245. Washington, D.C.: Office of Technology Assessment.
22.
RowseJ. (1986) “Allocation of Canadian Natural Gas to Domestic and Export Markets.” Canadian Journal of Economics19 (August): 417-42.
23.
SweeneyJ. L. (1984). “The Response of Energy Demand to Higher Prices: What Have Wc Learned?” American Economic Review74 (May): 31-37.
24.
WavermanL. (1972a). “National Policy and Natural GAs: The Costs of a Border.” Canadian Journal of Economics5 (August): 331-48.
25.
WavermanL. (1972b). “The Preventive Tariff and the Dual in Linear Programming.” American Economic Review62 (September): 620-29.
26.
WinterC. R., and Associates (1981). “Interim Report on Technical-Economic Study of Alberta Deep Basin Gas Potential.” Calgary: C. R. Winter and Associates, unpublished technical report.
