With memories of the energy crisis fading in the midst of an oil glut, one can reflect with objectivity on events of the past two decades. Many papers published in the past several years have attempted to analyze post-embargo energy trends and made observations on whether these new trends represent abberations in long-term relationships or represent fundamental changes in energy-economic interactions.
Committee on Nuclear and Alternative Energy Systems (CONAES), Energy in Transition 1985-2010, National Academy Press, Wash. D.C., 1982.
2.
Data Resources Inc. (DRI) (1985). Energy Review9(1).
3.
Gas Research Institute (GRI) (1984). “1984 GRI Baseline Projections of U.S. Energy Supply and Demand, 1983-2010.” Chicago: Gas Research Institute.
4.
Hirst, Eric, R. Marlay, D. Green, and R. Barns (1983). “Recent Changes in U.S. Energy Consumption: What Happened and Why.” Annual Review of Energy pp. 193-245.
5.
HoganWilliam (1984). “Patterns of Energy Use.” Energy & Environmental Policy Center, Discussion Paper E-84-04, Harvard University.
6.
KaufmanAlvinDulchinosD.ParkerL. (1984), “Gold at the End of the Rainbow?: A Perspective on the Future of the Electric Utility Industry.” Congressional Research Service Report No. 84-236-S (December).
SearlMilton (1983). “Electricity and Economic Growth in the U.S., 1902-1982—An Aggregate Analysis.” Palo Alto, Calif.: Electric Power Research Institute.
9.
SiegelJohnSillinJohn (1985). Reply letter in Public Utilities Fortnightly (January10).
10.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (1983). “The Future of Electric Power in America: Economic Supply for Economic Growth.” Washington, D.C.: U.S.G.P.O.
11.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (1982). “Trends in Energy Use and Conservation.” Washington, D.C.: U.S.G.P.O.
12.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (1985). Annual Energy Outlook 1984. Washington, D.C.: U.S.G.P.O.
