Competition and regulation are often perceived to be in conflict, because regulation usually evolves in response to a failure of the market system. In the case of public utilities in the United States, the familiar argument is that production scale economies make it cheaper for a single firm to provide essential products or services than for two or more firms to do so. To take advantage of the production efficiencies but avoid the resource allocation problems inherent in monopoly levels of price and output, either assets are publicly owned or a privately owned firm is regulated.' In the first case, the incentive to maximize profits is replaced by the need to maximize political support.' Thus the price charged for output is less than the monopoly price. In the second case, states have created public utility commissions (PUCs) to control both access to the market and the monopolist's price and output decisions.
BornholzR.EvansD. (1983). “;The Early History of Competition in the Telephone Industry.” InD. S. Evans, ed„ Breaking Up Bell. New York: North-Holland.
5.
BraeutigamR. R. (1981). “Regulation of Multiproduct Enterprises by Rate of Return, Markup, and Operating Ratio.” Research in Law and Economics3: 15—38.
6.
BraeutigamR. R.OwenB. (1978). The Regulation Game. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
7.
BrandonP. (1971). “The Electric Side of Combination Gas-Electric Utilities.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science2 (Autumn): 688-703.
8.
Carolina Pipeline Company v. South Carolina Public Service Commission (1971). 178 S.E. 2d 669 (S.C. 1971).
9.
CollinsW. H. (1973). “Comparative Performance of Combinations and Separately Managed Electric Utilities.” Southern Economic Journal40 (July): 80-89.
10.
CollinsW. H. (1974). “Comparative Performance of Combinations and Separately Managed
11.
Electric Utilities: Reply.” Southern Economic Journal 41 (October): 321-24.
12.
CollinsW. J. (1983). “Electric Utility Rate Regulation: Curing Economic Shortcomings through Competition.” Tulsa Law Journal19 (Winter): 141-85.
13.
“Combination Utility Companies” (1971). Hearings before the Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly of the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Ninety-Second Congress. Washington. D C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14.
DaughetyA. F. (1984). “Regulation and Industrial Organization.” Journal of Political Economy92 (October): 932-53.
15.
DemsctzH. (1968). “Why Regulate Utilities?” Journal of Law and Economics11 (April): 55-65.
16.
“Electric Customer Denied Right to Switch Suppliers” (1984). Public Utilities Fortnightly (March1), pp. 70-71.
17.
FaulhaberG. (1975). “Cross-Subsidization: Pricing in Public Enterprises.” American Economic Review65 (December): 960-77.
18.
“In Re: Application of South Carolina Electric & Gas Company and Carolina Energies, Inc., for Approval of Merger” (1982). Docket No. 82-45-G, Order No. 82-215, South Carolina Public Service Commission (March30).
19.
“In Re: Petition of South Carolina Electric & Gas Company” (1969). Docket No. 14,775, Order No. 14,955, South Carolina Public Service Commission (November12).
20.
“In the Matter of the Petition of Minnesota Gas Company for Authority to Change Its Schedule of Rates and Charges for Natural Gas Service in Minnesota” (1983). Docket No. G-008/GR-82-249, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (March21).
21.
JarrellG. (1978). “The Demand for State Regulation of the Electric Utility Industry.” Journal of Law and Economics21 (October): 269-95.
22.
KahnA. (1970). The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions, 2 vols. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
23.
LandonJ. (1973). “Pricing in Combined Gas and Electric Utilties: A Second Look.” Antitrust Bulletin18 (Spring): 83 97.
24.
LandonJ.PaceJ. (1982). “Introducing Competition into the Electric Utility Industry: An Economic Appraisal.” Energy Law Journal3, No. 1, 1-65.
MacAvoyP. (1979). The Regulated Industries and the Economy. New York: W. W. Norton.
27.
MayoJ. W. (1984). “Multiproduct Monopoly, Regulation, and Firm Costs.” Southern Economic Journal51 (July): 208-18.
28.
NavarroP. (1983). “Save Now, Freeze Later: The Real Price of Cheap Electricity.” Regulation7 (September/October): 31-36.
29.
OwenB. (1970). “Monopoly Pricing in Combined Gas and Electric Utilities.” Antitrust Bulletin15 (Winter): 713-26.
30.
PaceJ. (1972). “The Relative Performance of Combination Gas-Electric Utilities.” Antitrust Bulletin17 (Summer): 519-68.
31.
PeltzmanS. (1971). “Pricing in Public and Private Enterprises: Electric Utilities in the United States.’” Journal of Law and Economics 14 (April): 109-47.
32.
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Equitable Gas Co. R-822031, R-822031C00I adopted November 22, 1983, entered March 22. 1984.
33.
PrimeauxW. (1974). “A Duopoly in Electricity: Competition in a Natural Monopoly.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Business14 (Summer): 65-73.
34.
PrimeauxW. (1982). “Two Electric Utility Firms Are Better than One.” Unpublished manuscript.
35.
“Rates of Return on Common Equity: A Survey of Electric Rate Cases” (1983). Public Utilities Fortnightly (September I ), pp. 54-58.
36.
RozekR. P. (1984). “The Over-Capitalization Effect with Diversification and Cross Subsidization.” Economics Letters16 (October): 159-63.
SingM. (1983). “Economics of Scope in the Supply of Electricity and Natural Gas.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin.
39.
SponsellerD. (1984). “Customer Preference in Selecting Utility Service” Public Utilities Fortnightly (August2), pp. 49-53.
40.
“Spotlight on Site Selection” (1983). Electronic News Supplement (October10).
41.
StevensonR. (1982). “X-lnefficiency and Interfirm Rivalry: Evidence from the Electric Utility Industry.” Land Economics58 (February): 52-66.
42.
“Utilities Are Tempting Big Customers to Turn Up the Juice” (1983). Business Week (October31), pp. 121-24.
43.
“Utility Competition with Small Business: Recommendations for States on Utility Energy-Related Programs and the Commercial and Apartment Conservation Service Program” (1984). U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy.
44.
WeissL. (1975). “Antitrust in the Electric Power Industry.” In A. Phillips. ed., Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
45.
WilderR. (1972). “Utility Regulation in South Carolina, with Special Attention to the SCE &G Rate Case.” Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of South Carolina-Business and Economic Review (March), pp. 7-11.
