Capacity expansion decisions are critically important to both public and private-sector energy suppliers as well as regional and national energy planning agencies. Simplistically stated, planning for the expansion of an energy supply system involves determining when and where new energy production facilities of various types and sizes should be deployed to meet projected demands. As with most energy-related decision problems, several factors complicate capacity expansion planning. These factors include the involvement of multiple decisionmakers and interest groups, uncertainties about technology costs and demand projections, varying degrees of risk associated with alternative energy technologies, the need to consider costs and effects over long time horizons, and the difficulty of quantifying key impacts and concerns.
AignerV. (1980). Natural Gas Supply Summary for Wisconsin. Madison, Wisc,: Wisconsin Division of State Energy Report DSE/FF:002.
2.
AndersonD. (1972). “Models for Determining Least-Cost Investments in Electricity Supply.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science3:26799.
3.
BuehringW. A.FoellW. K.KeeneyR. L. (1978). “Examining Energy/Environment Policy Using Decision Analysis.” Energy Systems and Policy2, No. 3. '
4.
DouglasJ. (1983). “A Roadmap for Complex Decisions.” Electric Power Research Institute Journal8(7).
5.
FoellW. K., (1981). The Wisconsin-IIASA Set of Energy/Environment (WISE) Models for Regional Planning and Management: An Overview. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Report RR-81-17.
6.
FurnibB.SchuLzV.StehfestH. (1980). Optimierung des Energieversorgungs-systems von Baden—Wurttemberg bei Mehrfacher Zielsetzung. Karlsruhe, West Germany: KfK 2978/1, Kemforschungszentrum.
7.
GardinerP.EdwardsW. (1975). Public Values; Multi-attribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision Making. New York: Academic Press.
8.
JuddB. R. (1978). “Decision Analysis of Electrical Capacity Expansion.” In Lawrence Symposium on Systems and Decision Sciences 1977. North Hollywood, Calif.: Western Periodicals.
9.
KeeneyR. L. (1980). Siting Energy Facilities. New York: Academic Press.
10.
KeeneyR. L. (1982). “Decision Analysis: An Overview.” Operations Research30 (September-October).
11.
KeeneyR. L.RaiffaH. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives. New York: Wiley.
12.
KeeneyR. L.SichermanA. (1983). “Illustrative Comparison of One Utility's Coal and Nuclear Choices.” Operations Research31 (January-February).
13.
LandsbergH. (1979). Energy: The Next Twenty Years. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
14.
LindenH. R. (1983). “The Changing Energy Market and the Role of Technology in Keeping Natural Gas Competitive.” Presented at Argonne National Laboratory Director's Colloquium, Argonne, III.
15.
LussH. (1982). “Operations Research and Capacity Expansion Problems: A Survey.” Operations Research30 (September-October).
16.
ManneA. S.RichelsR. G. (1978). “A Decision Analysis of the U.S. Breeder Program.” Energy3:747-67.
PeerenboomJ. P. (1981). “A Dynamic Decision Model for Evaluating Supplemental Gas Supply Systems for Wisconsin.” Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison.
19.
PeerenboomJ. P.BuehringW. A.JosephT. W. (1984). “A Decision-Analytic Framework for Portfolio Selection.” Argonne. Ill.: Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL/AA-31.
20.
SanghviA. P.LimaycD. R. (1979). “Planning Future Electrical Generating Capacity.” Energy Policy (June).
21.
SarinR. K. (1980). “Ranking of Multiattribute Alternatives with an Application of Coal Power Plant Siting.” In G. Faudel and T. Gal (eds ). Multiple Criteria Decision Making—Theory and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
22.
SchurrS. H. (1979). Energy in America’s Future. Baltimore, Md.: John Hopkins University Press.
23.
StobaughR.YerginD. (1979). Energy Future: Report of the Energy Project at the Harvard Business School. New York: Random House.
24.
UlvilaJ.BrownR. (1982). “Decision Analysis Comes of Age.” Harvard Business Review (September October), 130 141.
25.
U.S. Office of Technology Assessment (1983). U.S. Natural Gas Availability: Conventional Gas Supply through the Year 2000, PB84-114909.
26.
Woodward-Clyde Consultants (1979). Environmental Assessment Methodology: Solar Power Plant Applications. Palo Alto, Calif.: Electric Power Research Institute Report ER-1070.
