The Welfare Impacts of Rural Electrification in Bangladesh

Abstract

Lack of access to electricity has been considered a major impediment to the growth and development of rural economies. Thus, the provision of electricity and other forms of modern energy has been a priority for many development organizations, including the World Bank. However, few impact studies of electrification have taken the endogeneity of the grid connection into account. Using a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2005 of 20,900 rural households in Bangladesh, this paper examines the welfare impacts of household access to grid electricity after controlling for endogeneity bias. The econometric analysis shows that grid electrification has significant positive impacts on household income, expenditure, and education. The household gain in total income due to electrification is as high as 21 percent, with a 1.5 percentage point reduction in poverty per year. The results also suggest that the income and expenditure effects ofelectricity connection are higher for better-off households.

doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol33-No1-8

Keywords

Rural electrification;Electrification impacts;Distributional impacts;Bangladesh

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alam

M.S.

Kabir

Rahman

M.M.

Chowdhury

M.A.K.

(2004). “Power Sector Reforms in Bangladesh: Electricity Distribution System.” Energy 29: 1773-1783.

Anderson

Dennis

(1975). “Costs and Benefits of Rural Electrification: A Case Study in El Salvador.” World Bank Public Utilities Report, No. 5. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Barkat

Abul

Rahman

Zaman

Podder

Halim

Ratna

Majid

Maksud

Karim

Islam

(2002). Economic and Social Impact Evaluation Study of the Rural Electrification Program in Bangladesh. Report to the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA) International, Dhaka.

BETS and BUP (Bangladesh Engineering and Technological Services Ltd. and Bangladesh Unnayan Parishad (2006). Socio-economic Monitoring and Impact E-valuation of Rural Electrification and Renewable Energy Program in Bangladesh: A Baseline Survey. Report prepared for the Rural Electrification Board, Dhaka.

Mark

Blackden C.

Wodon

Quentin

(eds.) (2006). “Gender, Time Use, and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa.” World Bank Discussion Paper, No. 73. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Burlando

Alfredo

(2010). “When the Lights Go Out: The Consequences of Prolonged Blackouts in Africa.” University of Oregon, Eugene (mimeo).

Dinkelman

Taryn

(2010). “The Effects of Rural Electrification on Employment: New Evidence from South Africa.” Princeton University (mimeo).

Frolich

Marcus

Melly

Blaise

(2007). “Unconditional Quantile Treatment Effects Under Endogeneity.” CeMMAP Working Paper, CWP32/07. Institute for Fiscal Studies, Department of Economics. London: University College London.

Heckman

James

(1981). “The Incidental Parameters Problem and the Problem of Initial Conditions in Estimating a Discrete Time-discrete Data Stochastic Process and Some Monte Carlo Evidence.” In Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, eds. Charles F. Manski and Daniel McFadden. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.

10.

Khandker

Shahidur R.

Bakht

Zaid

Koolwal

Gayatri B.

(2009). “The Poverty Impact of Rural Roads: Evidence from Bangladesh.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 57(4): 685-722.

11.

Meier

Peter

Tuntivate

Voravate

Barnes

Douglas

Bogach

Susan

(2007). “National Survey of Rural Household Energy Use in Peru.” Draft Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.

12.

Nieuwenhout

F.D.J.

van de Rijt

PJ.N.M.

Wiggelinkhuizen

E.J.

(1998). “Rural Lighting Services.” Paper prepared for the World Bank, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation, Petten.

13.

O’Sullivan

Kyran

Barnes

Douglas

(2006). “Energy Policies and Multitopic Household Surveys.” World Bank Working Paper, No. 90. World Bank, Washington, DC.

14.

REB (Rural Electrification Board) (2010). Available at www.reb.gov.bd/index.htm.

15.

USAID (United States Agency for International Development) . 2006. Integrity in Bangladesh’s Rural Electrification. Report prepared by Nathan Associates, Inc. for USAID.

16.

Waddle

Daniel B

(2007). “Rural Poverty and Electricity Challenges in Bangladesh.” In The Challenges of Rural Electrification: Strategies for Developing Countries, ed. Douglas F. Barnes. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

17.

World Bank (2002a). “Energy Strategies for Rural India: Evidence from Six States.” Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) Report No. 258/02. Washington, DC: World Bank.

18.

World Bank (2002b). “Rural Electrification and Development in the Philippines: Measuring the Social and Economic Benefits.” Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) Report No. 255/02. Washington, DC: World Bank.

19.

World Bank (2008). The Welfare Impact of Rural Electrification: A Reassessment of the Costs and Benefits: An IEG Impact Evaluation. Washington, DC: World Bank.