Earlier research has shown that adding wind generation to a network can lower the total annual operating cost by displacing conventional generation. At the same time, the variability of wind generation and the need for higher levels of reserve generating capacity to maintain reliability standards impose additional costs on the system that should not be ignored. The important implication for regulators is that the capacity payments [“missing money”] for each MW of peak system load are now much higher. Hence, the economic benefits of reducing the peak system load using storage or controllable demand will be higher with high penetrations of wind generation. These potential benefits are illustrated in a case study using a test network and a security constrained Optimal Power Flow (OPF) with endogenous reserves (SuperOPF). The results show that the benefits are very sensitive to 1) how much of the inherent variability of wind generation is mitigated, and 2) how the missing money is determined (e.g. comparing regulation with deregulation). doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol33-No1-7
AndersonC.L.CardellJ.B. (2008), Reducing the Variability of Wind Power Generation for Participation in Day Ahead Electricity Markets,, in HICSS '08: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, p. 178.
2.
BentekEnergy (2010). “How Less Became More: Wind, Power and Unintended Consequences in the Colorado Energy Market,” Technical report, Bentek Energy.
3.
BillintonR.BaiG. (2004). “Generating capacity adequacy associated with wind energy,” Energy Conversion, IEEE Transactions on, 19(3): 641-646.
4.
BirdL.ChapmanC.LoganJ.SumnerJ.ShortW. (2011). “Evaluating renewable portfolio standards and carbon cap scenarios in the U.S. electric sector,” Energy Policy, 39(5): 2573-2585. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V2W-529SWC03/2/2112bda19624da724fc d6dfdb653cbc8.
5.
BouffardF.GalianaF.ConejoA. (2005). “Market-clearing with stochastic security-part I: formulation,” Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 20(4): 1818-1826.
6.
BouffardF.GalianaF.ConejoA. (2006). “Market-clearing with stochastic security-part II: case studies,” in Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2006. IEEE, 1.
7.
ChenJ.MountT.D.ThorpJ.S.ThomasR.J. (2005). “Location-based scheduling and pricing for energy and reserves: a responsive reserve market proposal,” Decis. SupportSyst., 40(3-4): 563577.
8.
ChenJ.ThorpJ.S.ThomasR.J.MountT.D. (2003). “Locational Pricing and Scheduling for an Integrated Energy-Reserve Market,” in HICSS r03: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’03) Track 2, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., USA, 54.1.
9.
DOE (2008). “20% Wind Energy by 2030,” Technical Report NA, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). URL: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/pdfs/41869.pdf.
10.
FuY.ShahidehpourM.LiZ. (2006). “AC contingency dispatch based on security-constrained unit commitment,” Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 21(2): 897- 908.
11.
GEEnergy (2010). “Western Wind and Solar Integration Study,” Technical report, The National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
12.
HittingerE.WhitacreJ.AptJ. (2010). “Compensating for wind variability using co-located natural gas generation and energy storage,” Energy Systems, 1: 417-439. 10.1007/s12667-010-0017-2. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12667-010-0017-2.
13.
HolttinenH.MeibomP.EnsslinC.HofmannL.McCannJ.PierikJ.TandeJ.O.Hagstr0mE.EstanqueiroA.AmarisH.SoderL.StrbacG.ParsonsB. (2006). “Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power, IEA collaboration,” in NORDIC WIND POWER CONFERENCE, 22-23 MAY, 2006, ESPOO, FINLAND.
14.
KatzensteinW.AptJ. (2008). “Air Emissions Due To Wind And Solar Power,” Environmental Science & Technology, 43(2): 253-258. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es801437t.
15.
KopkaH.DalyP. (1999). A Guide to LATEX, Harlow, England: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Lopez-LezamaJ.Murillo-SanchezC.ZuluagaL.Gutierrez-GomezJ. (2006). “A Contingency-Based Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow Model For Revealing The Marginal Cost of a Blackout Risk-Equalizing Policy in the Colombian Electricity Market,” in Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America, 2006. TDC r06. IEEE/PES, 1-6.
17.
MilliganM.PorterK.DeMeoE.DenholmP.HolttinenH.KirbyB.MillerN.MillsA.O’MalleyM.SchuergerM.SoderL. (2009). “Wind power myths debunked,” Power and Energy Magazine, IEEE, 7(6): 89-99.
18.
MountT.D.LamadridA.ManeevitjitS.ThomasR.J.ZimmermanR. (2009). “A Symbiotic Role for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles in an Electric Delivery System,” in Proceedings of the 22nd Rutgers Western Conference, Monterey, CA.
19.
Murillo-SanchezC.ThomasR. (1998). “Thermal unit commitment including optimal AC power flow constraints,” in System Sciences, 1998., Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on, 3: 81-88.
20.
Murillo-SanchezC.ThomasR. (1999). “Thermal unit commitment with nonlinear power flow constraints,” in Power Engineering Society 1999 Winter Meeting, IEEE, 1: 484-489.
NERC (2009). Reliability Standards for the Bulk Electric Systems of North America, 116-390 Village Road, Princeton, NJ, 08540: North American Electric Reliability Corporation. URL: http://www.nerc.com/files/Reliability Standards Complete Set 2009Sept14.pdf.
23.
NYISOD.P. (2007). “2007 State of the Market Report New York Electricity Markets,” Independent market advisor, NYISO, Potomac Economics. URL: isor reports/2007 NYISO SOM presentation 51908.pdf.
24.
RothkopfM.H. (2007). “Dealing with Failed Deregulation: What Would Price C. Watts Do?” The Electricity Journal, 20(7): 10-16. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VSS-4PC4F462/2/27c528783c63c2dd93bfa7380a74a942.
25.
SmithJ.MilliganM.DeMeoE.ParsonsB. (2007). “Utility Wind Integration and Operating Impact State of the Art,” Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 22(3): 900-908.
26.
ThomasR.Murillo-SanchezC.ZimmermanR. (2008). “An advanced security constrained OPF that produces correct market-based pricing,” in Power and Energy Society General Meeting—Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century, 2008 IEEE, 1-6.
27.
ZimmermanR.Murillo-SanchezC.ThomasR. (2009). “MATPOWER’s extensible optimal power flow architecture,” in Power Energy Society General Meeting, 2009. PES r09. IEEE, 1-7.
28.
ZimmermanR.D.Murillo-SanchezC.E.ThomasR.J. (2011). “MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education,” Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 26(1): 12-19.
