The multi-sector end-use energy model E3MC was used to analyze the energy and greenhouse gas emissions impact of adding a carbon tax to efficiency improvement standards for the residential sector in Canada and the USA. Compared to standards alone, the addition of the tax led to further residential emission reductions in Canada, but attenuated the residential emission reductions in the USA. Examination of the relative residential electricity:natural gas prices demonstrated that the different country impacts were due to an increase in relative prices in the USA, but a decrease in relative prices in Canada that led to opposite shifts in preference for electricity over natural gas in the residential sector. Markedly different impacts of the carbon tax on electricity prices was due to the predominance of hydroelectric power in Canada and coal-fired electric generation in the USA. doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-6
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmstaldenR. W.KostM.NathaniC.ImbodenD. M. (2006). “Economic potential of energy-efficient retrofitting in the Swiss residential building sector: The effects of policy instruments and energy price expectations.” Energy Policy35(3):1819-1829.
2.
AtkinsonJ.JacksonT.Mullings-SmithE. (2009). “Market influence on the low carbon energy refurbishment of existing multi-residential buildings.” Energy Policy37(7): 2582-2593.
3.
Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2009). Annual Energy Outlook 2009 with Projections to 2030, DOE/EIA-0383(2009). Energy Information Administration, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington D.C. Available from: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo09/pdf/0383(2009).pdf
4.
Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2005). Annual Energy Outlook 2005 with Projections to 2025, DOE/EIA-0383(2005). Energy Information Administration, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington D.C. Available from: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo05/download.html
5.
GerlaghR.van der ZwaanB. (2006). “Options and Instruments for a Deep Cut in CO2 Emissions: Carbon Dioxide Capture or Renewables, Taxes or Subsidies.” The Energy Journal27(3):25:48.
6.
GillinghamK.NewellR. G.PalmerK. (2009). Energy Efficiency Economics and Policy, Discussion Paper 09-13, Resources for the Future, Washington D.C.
7.
GoulderLawrence H. and Ian W.H. Parry (2008). “Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy2(2): 152-174.
8.
HauptA.StadejekM. (2010). The Choice of Environmental Policy Instruments: Energy Efficiency and Redistribution, CESIFO Working Paper No. 2986. Presented at CESIFO Conference on Energy and Climate Economics, October2009.
9.
H.R. 2454 (2009). “American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009.” 111th Congress, 1st Session. Washington, D.C.
10.
Informetrica Ltd. (2010) Personal communications with Charles Saunders (Informetrica Ltd.).
11.
KyleP.ClarkeL.RongF.SmithS. J. (2010). “Climate Policy and the Long-Term Evolution of the U.S. Buildings Sector.” The Energy Journal31(2): 145-172.
12.
LambandeiraX.LabeagaJ.M.RodriguezM. (2009). “An integrated economic and distributional analysis of energy policies.” Energy Policy37(12): 5776:5786.
13.
MurphyF. H.RosenthalE. C. (2006). “Allocating the Added Value of Energy Policies.” Energy Policy27(2): 143-156.
14.
National Energy Board (NEB) (2009). 2009 Reference Case Scenario: Canadian Energy and Supply to 2020. National Energy Board, Calgary, Canada. Available from: http://www.neb.gc.ca/clf-nsi/rnrgynfmtn/nrgyrprt/nrgyftr/2009/rfrnccsscnr2009-eng.pdf
15.
NewellR. G.JaffeA. B.StavinsR. N. (2006). “The effects of economic and policy incentives on carbon mitigation technologies.” Energy Economics28(5-6): 563-578.
16.
OikonomouV.FlamosA.GrafakosS. (2010). “Is blending of energy and climate policy instruments always desirable?” Energy Policy38(8): 4186-4195.
17.
ParryIan W.H. and Roberton C. Williams (1999). “A Second-Best Evaluation of Eight Policy Instruments to Reduce Carbon Emissions.” Resource and Energy Economics21(3-4): 347-373.
18.
PizerW.BurtrawD.HarringtonW.NewellR.SanchiricoJ. (2006). “Modeling Economy-wide vs Sectoral Climate Policies Using Combined Aggregate-Sectoral Models.” Energy Journal27(3):135-168.
19.
ProostStefRousseauSandra (2009). “The Relative Efficiency of Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments with Imperfect Compliance.” International Tax and Pubilc Finance16(1): 2542.
20.
Statistics Canada (2009). Report on Energy Supply and Demand in Canada. Ministry of Industy, Ottawa, Canada. Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/57-003-x/57-003-x2007000-eng.pdf
21.
Systematic Solutions (1996). ENERGY 2020 Documentation 1: 1-14. Fairborn, Ohio.
22.
WingI. S. (2006) “The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down approaches to climate policy modeling: Electric power technologies and the cost of limiting US CO2 emissions.” Energy Policy34(18): 3847:3869.
23.
WissemaW.DellinkR. (2007). “AGE analysis of the impact of a carbon tax on the Irish economy.” Ecological Economics61(4): 671-683.
24.
WiserR.BolingerM. (2007). “Can deployment of renewable energy put downward pressure on natural gas prices?” Energy Policy35(1): 295-306.
