Government, utility, and private subsidies for energy efficiency play a prominent role in current efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, yet the effectiveness of this policy approach is in dispute. One opportunity for empirical analysis is provided by the past energy efficiency subsidies, called demand-side management programs, offered by electric utilities in North America over several decades. Between 1990 and 2005, most electric utilities in Canada administered such programs, with total spending of $2.9 billion (CDN$2005). This paper uses the significant inter-annual variation in demand side management spending during this period to econometrically estimate the effectiveness of these subsidies. The resulting estimates indicate that these programs have not had a substantial impact on overall electricity consumption in Canada.
AlberiniAnnaFilippiniMassimo (2010). Response of residential electricity demand to price: The effect of measurement error. Working paper 75, Centre for Energy Policy and Economics, Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology.
2.
ArellanoM.BondS. (1991). “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations.” The Re-view of Economic Studies, 58(2):277-297.
3.
ArimuraT.H.NewellR.G.PalmerK.L. (2009). Cost-effectiveness of electricity energy efficiency programs. Discussion Paper 09-48, Resources for the Future.
4.
AuffhammerMaximilianBlumsteinCarlFowlieMeredith (2008). “Demand-side management and energy efficiency revisited.” The Energy Journal, 29(3):91-104.
5.
BlundellR.BondS. (1998). “Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models.” Journal of Econometrics, 87(1):115-143.
6.
EspeyJames A. and Molly Espey (2004). “Turning on the lights: A meta-analysis of residential electricity demand elasticities.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 36(1):65-81.
7.
EtoJosephKitoSuzieShownLeslieSonnenblickRichard (1995). Where Did the Money Go?: The Cost and Performance of the Largest Commercial Sector DSM Programs. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
8.
GellerHowardAttaliSophie (2005). The experience with energy efficiency policies in IEA countries: Learning from the critics. Technical report, International Energy Agency.
9.
GellingsClark W. (1996). “Then and now: The perspective of the man who coined the term ‘DSM’.” Energy Policy, 24(4):285-288.
10.
GillinghamKennethNewellRichardPalmerKaren (2006). “Energy efficiency policies: A retrospective examination.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1):161-192.
11.
GreeningLorna A.GreeneDavid L.DifiglioCarmen (2000). “Energy efficiency and con-sumption—the rebound effect—a survey.” Energy Policy, 28(6-7):389-401.
12.
GroschePeterVanceColin (2009). “Willingness to pay for energy conservation and free-ridership on subsidization: Evidence from Germany.” The Energy Journal, 30(2):135-153.
13.
HartmanR.S. (1988). “Self-selection bias in the evolution of voluntary energy conservation programs.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3):448-458.
14.
HorowitzMarvin J. (2004). “Electricity intensity in the commercial sector: Market and public program effects.” The Energy Journal, 25(2):115-137.
15.
HorowitzMarvin J. (2007). “Changes in electricity demand in the united states from the 1970s to 2003.” The Energy Journal, 28(3):93-119.
16.
HouthakkerH.S.VerlegerP.K.SheehanD.P. (1974). “Dynamic demand analyses for gasoline and residential electricity.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(2):412.
17.
JaccardM. (1993). “Regulation of energy utilities in Canada: Where do we go from here?” Energy Studies Review, 4(3):5.
18.
JudsonR.A.OwenA.L. (1999). “Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for macroeconomists.” Economics Letters, 65(1):9-15.
19.
KivietJ.F. (1995). “On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models.” Journal of Econometrics, 68(1):53-78.
20.
LoughranDavid S. and Jonathan Kulick (2004). “Demand-side management and energy efficiency in the United States.” The Energy Journal, 25(1):19-43.
21.
LouviereJordan J.HenscherD. A.SwaitJeffrey D. (2000). Stated Choice Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
22.
MalmEric (1996). “An actions-based estimate of the free rider fraction in electric utility DSM programs.” The Energy Journal, 17(3):41.
23.
NadelStevenGellerHoward (1996). “Utility DSM: What have we learned? Where are we going?” Energy Policy, 24(4):289-302.
24.
Natural Resources Canada (2006). Energy use data handbook: 1990 and 1998 to 2004. Technical report, Canada.
25.
NickellS. (1981). “Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49(6):1417-1426.
26.
ParfomakPaul W. and Lester B. Lave (1996). “How many kilowatts are in a negawatt? Verifying ex post estimates of utility conservation impacts at a regional level.” The Energy Journal, 17(4):59.
27.
PaulA.C.MyersE.C.PalmerK.L. (2009). A partial adjustment model of US electricity demand by region, season, and sector. Discussion Paper DP 08-50, Resources for the Future.
28.
Sampson Research (2005). Market and impact evaluation of BC Hydro’s seasonal LED initiative. Consulting report, BC Hydro.
29.
SaundersHarry D. (1992). “The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth.” The Energy Journal, 13(4):131-148.
30.
SerletisA.TimilsinaG.VasetskyO. (2010). International evidence on sectoral interfuel substitution. Working Papers.
31.
SorrellS.DimitropoulosJ. (2007). Technical report 2: Econometric studies, UKERC review of evidence for the rebound effect. Working paper, UK Energy Research Centre.
32.
SorrellSteve (2007). The rebound effect: An assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. Technical report, UK Energy Research Centre.
33.
TrainKenneth E.AthertonTerry (1995). “Rebates, loans, and customers’ choice of appliance efficiency level: Combining stated- and revealed-preferences.” The Energy Journal, 16(1):55.
