We calculate the cost of a carbon dioxide constraint in the production of electricity by modeling the replacement of coal generators with natural gas generators. We find: First, replacing coal generators with natural gas generators is the most economical way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 20 percent. Second, replacing existing coal generation capacity with modern coal generation plants can only reduce total carbon dioxide by 5 percent. Third, the distribution of the efficiency of coal generators in the United States restricts the range over which carbon dioxide prices effectively manage the displacement of coal by gas. Fourth, the narrow range for the price of carbon dioxide creates the possibility that a market in carbon dioxide permits will result in high volatility in the market for electricity. Fifth, the carbon prices implied by the transition from coal to gas will have very little impact on transportation fuels.
AlberolaEmilieChevallierJulien (2009). “European Carbon Prices and Banking Restrictions: Evidence from Phase I.” The Energy Journal, 30(3): 51-80.
2.
BartisJames T.CammFrankOrtizDavid S. (2008). Producing Liquid Fuelsfrom Coal. RAND Corporation.
3.
BENTEK Energy, LLC (2010). How Less BecameMore: Wind, Powerand Unintended Consequences in the Colorado Energy Market. Available at http://www.bentekenergy.com/WindCoalandGas-Study.aspx.
4.
Bergerson and Lave (2007). “The Long-Term Life Cycle Private and External Costs of High Coal Usage in the U.S.” Energy Policy35(12): 6225-6234.
5.
DeutchJohn, (2003). The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
6.
DeutchJohn, (2009). 2009 Update of the 2003 MIT Report: The Future of Nuclear Power. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/pdf/nuclear-power-update2009.pdf.
7.
Du DuYanboParsonsJohn E. (May2009). Update of Costof NuclearPower. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
8.
The Economist (2010). “Cap-and-trade’s last hurrah,” March 20.
9.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). EIA 923 (formerly the 920/906) database. http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/'e/ectricify/page/eia906’_920.htm/.
10.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). Electric Power Industry 2008: Year in Review. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epa_sum.html.
11.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States, 2008. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/flowchart.html.
12.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States, 2007. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/figure_1.html.
13.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). Natural Gas Navigator. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n3045us3m.htm.
14.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). Electric Power Annual, 2007, p. 16, Table 1.1 a.-. http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/page/arc/table 3.4.html.
15.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). Coal News and Markets. Week of July 4, 2004. Available at http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/FTPR00T/coal/newsmarket/coalmar040704.html.
16.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). U.S. Coal Supply and Demand, 2009 Review. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/page/special/tbl2.html.
17.
HartleyPeterMedlockKenneth (2006). The Rice World Gas Trade Model. In Natural Gas and Geopolitics: From 1970 to 2040, eds. David G. Victor, Amy M. Jaffe, and Mark H. Hayes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
KaplanStan Mark (2010). Displacing Coal with Generation from Existing Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants. Congressional Research Service. Available at http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R41027_20100119.pdf.
19.
Kettunen, (2011). “Investment Propensities under Carbon Policy Uncertainty.” The Energy Journal, 32(1): 77-118.
20.
Kolstad CharlesD. (1996). “Fundamental irreversibilities in stock externalities.” Journal of Public Economics, 62: 85-125.
21.
LaffontJean-JacquesTiroleJean (1996). “Pollution permits and compliance strategies.” Journal of Public Economics60: 221-233.
22.
LeonardDanielVan LongNgo (1992). Optimal Control Theory and Static Optimization in Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
MedlockKenneth B. (2009). The Rice World Gas Trade Model. Paper presented at CEC Workshop, James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, June 16, in Houston, Texas.
24.
Newcomer and Apt (2009). “Near Term Implications of a Ban on New Coal-Fired Power Plants in the U.S.” Environmental Science & Technology43(11): 3995-4001.
25.
Newcomer, (2008). “The Short Run Economic and Environmental Effects of a Carbon Tax on U.S. Electric Generation.” Environmental Science and Technology42(9):3139-3144.
26.
NordhausWilliam D. (2005). Life After Kyoto: Alternative Approaches to Global Warming Policies. Yale University. Available at http://www.econ.yale.edu/∼nordhaus/kyoto_long_2005.pdf.
27.
Patino, (2009). “Economic and environmental costs of regulatory uncertainty for coal-fired power plants.” Environmental Science & Technology43(3).
28.
SternN. (2007). The Stern review on economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press. Available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/indepen-dent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/stern_review_report.cfm.
29.
WolakFrank (2010). Regulatory Barriers to Lowering the Carbon Content of Energy Services. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, Stanford University. Available at http://pesd.stanford.edu/publications/regulatory_barriers_to_lowering_the_carbon_content_of_energy_services/.
