Bio-Energy Use and Low Stabilization Scenarios

Abstract

This paper explores the potential for bio-energy production, and the implications of different values for the attainability of low stabilization targets. The impact of scenarios of future land use, yield improvements for bio-energy and available land under different sustainability assumptions (protection of biodiversity, risks of water scarcity and land degradation) are explored. Typical values for sustainable potential of bio-energy production are around 50-150 EJ in 2050 and 200-400 EJ in 2100. Higher bio-energy potential requires a development path with high agricultural yields, dietary patterns with low meat consumption, a low population and/or accepting high conversion rates of natural areas. Scenario analysis using four different models shows that low stabilization levels may be achieved with a bio-energy potential of around 200 EJ p.a. In such scenarios, bio-energy is in most models mainly used outside the transport sector.

Keywords

Bio-Energy use Low climate stabilization Integrated assessment models Land use

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alcamo

Kreileman

Krol

Leemans

Bollen

Van Minnen

Schaeffer

Toet

de Vries

(1998). Global modelling of environmental change: an overview of IMAGE 2.1. in Alcamo, J., Leemans, R., and Kreileman, E., eds., Global change scenarios of the 21st century. Results from the IMAGE 2.1 model.London: Elseviers Science.

Alcamo

Van Vuuren

Ringler

Cramer

Masui

Alder

Schulze

(2005). “Changes in nature’s balance sheet: Model-based estimates of future worldwide ecosystem services”. Ecology and society 10, (2):

Azar

Lindgren

Larson

Mollersten

(2006). “Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass - Costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere”. Clim. Change, 74, (1-3): 47-79.

Bakkes

J. A.

Bosch

P. R.

Bouwman

A. F. E. H.C.

den Elzen

M. G. J.

Janssen

P. H. M.

Isaac

Klein Goldewijk

Kram

de Leeuw

F. A. A. M.

Olivier

J. G. J.

Van Oorschot

M. M. P.

Stehfest

E. E.

Van Vuuren

D. P.

Bagnoli

Chateau

Corfee-Morlot

Kim

Y. G.

(2008). Background report to the OECD Environmental Outlook to 2030. Overviews, details, and methodology of model-based analysis. Bilthoven.Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.

Beringer

Lucht

(2008). Simulation nachhaltiger Bioenergiepotentiale. Berlin. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveranderungen

Berndes

Hoogwijk

v. d. Broek

(2003). “The contribution of biomass in the future global energy system: a review of 17 studies”. Biomass and Bioenergy, 25, (1): 1-28.

Berndes

(2008). “Future Biomass Energy Supply: The Consumptive Water Use Perspective”. Water Resources Development,, 24, (2): 235-245.

Campbell

J. E.

Lobell

D. B.

Genova

R. C.

Field

C. B.

(2008). “The Global Potential of Bioenergy on Abandoned Agriculture Lands”. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, (15): 5791-5794.

Crutzen

P. J.

Mosier

A. R.

Smith

K. A.

Winiwarter

(2007). “N2O release from agrobiofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels”. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss, 7, 11191-11205.

10.

de Fraiture

Giordano

Liao

(2008). “Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: Blue impacts of green energy”. Water Policy 10, 67-81.

11.

de Noord

(2004). Potential and costs for renewable electricity generation. Petten.ECN

12.

de Vries

H. J. M.

Hoogwijk

Van Vuuren

and

(2007). “The potential supply of renewable energy: wind, solar and bio-energy”. Energy Policy, 35, (4): 2590-2610.

13.

Doll

Kaspar

Lehner

(2003). “A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation”. Journal of Hydrology, 270, 105-134.

14.

Dornburg

Faaij

A. P. C.

Verweij

Langeveld

van de Ven

Wester

Van Keulen

Van Diepen

Meeusen

Banse

Ros

Van Vuuren

van den Born

G. J.

Van Oorschot

Smout

Van Vliet

Aiking

Londo

Mozaffarian

Smekens

Lysen

Van Egmond

(2008). Biomass Assessment: Global biomass potentials and their links to food, water, biodiversity, energy demand and economy. Bilthoven.Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency

15.

Edenhofer

Knopf

Barker

Baumstark

Bellevrat

Chateau

Criqui

Isaac

Kitous

Kypreos

Leimbach

Lessmann

Magne

Scrieciu

Turton

Van Vuuren

and

(2010). “The economics of low stabilization: Model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs”. The Energy Journal, this issue.

16.

Fisher

Nakicenovic

Alfsen

Morlot Corfee

De la Chesnaye

Hourcade

J.-C.

Jiang

Kainuma

La Rovere

Matysek

Rana

Riahi

Richels

Rose

Van Vuuren

D. P.

Warren

(2007). Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context. in Metz

Davidson

Bosch

Dave

Meyer

eds., Climate Change 2007 - Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Fisher

Schrattenholzer

(2001). “Global biomass potentials through 2050”. Biomass and Biomass, 151-159.

18.

Hall

D. O.

Rosillo-Calle

Williams

R. H.

Woods

(1993). Biomass for energy: supply prospects. in Johansson

T.B.

Kelly

Reddy

A. K. N.

Williams

R. H.

eds., Renewable energy - Sources for fuels and electricity.Washington: Island Press.

19.

Hoogwijk

(2004). On the global and regional potential of renewable energy sources. Utrecht University.

20.

Hoogwijk

Faaij

Eickhout

de Vries

Turkenburg

(2005). “Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios”. Biomass and Bioenergy, 29, (4): 225-257.

21.

Hoogwijk

Van Vuuren

D. P.

de Vries

Turkenburg

(2007). “Exploring the impact on cost and electricity production of high penetration levels of intermittent electricity in OECD Europe and the USA, results for wind energy.” The Energy Journal, 32, (8): 1381-1402.

22.

IEA (2006). Energy balances of OECD and non OECD countries. Paris.International Energy Agency

23.

Kitous

Chateau

Criqui

Bellevrat

(2010). “Transformation patterns of the worldwide Energy System - Scenarios for the century”. The Energy Journal, this Issue.

24.

Leimbach

Bauer

Baumstark

Luken

Edenhofer

(2010). “International Trade and Technological Change - Insights from REMIND”. The Energy Journal, this Issue.

25.

Magne

Kypreos

Turton

(2010). “Technology options for low stabilization pathways with MERGE”. The Energy Journal, this Issue.

26.

Moldon

(2007). Water for food. Water for life. Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Washington DC. Earthscan.

27.

Nonhebel

(2007). “Energy from agricultural residues and consequences for land requirements for food production”. Agricultural Systems, 94, 586-592.

28.

OECD (2008). OECD Environmental Outlook. Paris.OECD.

29.

Oldeman

L. R.

Hakkeling

R. T. A.

Sombroek

W. G.

(1990). World Map of the Status of Human-Induced Soil Degradation; Explanatory Note (The) Global Assessment of Soil Degradation. Wageningen.ISRIC, UNEP, Winand Staring Centre, ISSS, FAO and ITC.

30.

Read

Sims

R.E.H.

Adams

J. F.

(2002). Community scaled bio-energy systems: 1st International Congress on Biomass for Metal Production and Electricity Generation, Belo Horizonte, 2002.

31.

Rose

Ahammad

Eickhout

Fisher

Kurosawa

Rao

Riahi

Van Vuuren

and

(2008). “Land-based mitigation in climate stabilization”. Submitted.

32.

Sathaye

Makundi

Andrasko

(1995). “A comprehensive mitigation assessment process (COMAP) for the evaluation of forestry mitigation options”. Biomass and Bioenergy, 8, (5): 345-356.

33.

Smeets

E. M. W.

Faaij

A.P. C.

Lewandowski

I. M.

Turkenburg

W. C.

(2007). “A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050”. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 33, 56-106.

34.

Smeets

E. M. W.

Bouwman

L.F.

Stehfest

Van Vuuren

D. P.

Posthuma

(2009). “Contribution of N2O to the greenhouse gas balance of first-generation biofuels”. Global Change Biology, 15, (1): 1-23.

35.

UNEP (2007). Global Environment Outlook 4. Nairobi.UNEP.

36.

Van Ruijven

Urban

Benders

R. M. J.

Moll

H. C.

van der Sluijs

J. P.

de Vries

Van Vuuren

D. P.

(2008). “Modeling Energy and Development: An Evaluation of Models and Concepts”. World Development, 36, (12): 2801-2821.

37.

Van Vuuren

D. P.

Eickhout

Lucas

and den Elzen

M.G. J.

(2006). “Long-term multigas scenarios to stabilise radiative forcing - Exploring costs and benefits within an integrated assessment framework”. The Energy Journal, Special issue #3, 201-234.

38.

Van Vuuren

D. P.

den Elzen

J.M. G.

Lucas

Eickhout

B. E.

Strengers

B. J.

Van Ruijven

Wonink

Van Houdt

(2007). “Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs”. Climatic Change, 81, (2): 119-159.

39.

Van Vuuren

D. P.

Ochola

W.O.

Riha

Giampietro

Ginzo

Henrichs

Kok

Makhura

Mirza

Palanisami

K. P.

Ranganathan

C. R.

Ray

Ringler

Rola

Westhoek

Zurek

(2008). Outlook on agricultural change and its drivers, in WatsonVuuren

ed., International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology Development.

40.

Van Vuuren

D. P.

Isaac

Kundzewicz

and

(2009a). Scenarios as the Basis for Assessment of Mitigation and Adaptation. in Hulme

Neufeld

eds., Making climate change work for us. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

41.

Van Vuuren

D. P.

Van Vliet

Stehfest

(2009b). “Future bio-energy potential under various natural constraints”. Energy Policy. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.029. In press.

42.

Van Vuuren

D. P.

Isaac

den Elzen

M. G. J.

Stehfest

Van Vliet

(2010). “Low stabilization scenarios and implications for major world regions from an integrated assessment perspective”. The Energy Journal, this Issue.