This paper presents a long-term assessment of the worldwide energy system in scenarios ranging from a baseline to a very low greenhouse gas stabilization, using the energy model POLES. Despite improved energy efficiency, the baseline scenario would lead to a doubling in energy consumption by 2050 increasing further thereafter. CO2 emissions would continue rising, driven by the coal consumed in the power production which roughly follows the GDP growth; the scarcity of oil resources would trigger the development of alternative vehicles. Conversely, a 400 ppm CO2 eq stabilization case would lead to drastic changes in supply (renewables - biomass), transformation (carbon capture and storage) and demand (low energy technologies). It transpires that the contribution to the reduction effort of low stabilization compared to a baseline scenario would be similar for final consumption (36% efficiency and 10% fuel mix) and for the power sector (25% renewables, 25% CCS, 4% nuclear). In addition this low emission scenario would alleviate the tensions on fossil energy markets.
AguileraR.F.EggertR.G.LagosG.TiltonJ.E. (2009). “Depletion and the future availability of petroleum resources”, The Energy Journal 30 (1):141-174.
2.
BGR (2006). Annual Report on Reserves, resources and availability of energy resources 2006.
3.
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Hannover, Germany.
4.
BerndesG.HoogwijkM.van den BroekR. (2003). “The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies”. Biomass and Bioenergy. 25:1-28.
5.
Chateau B.HamacherT.BiberacherM. (2004). VLEEM: Very Long-term Energy and Environment Modeling. EC DG RTD. Available at http://www.vleem.org/
6.
CriquiP.GusbinD.TulkensP.LapillonneB.Van IrelandW.RussP. (2003). WETO2030: World Energy Technology Outlook 2030. EC DG-RTD. http://ec.europa.eu/research/energy/pdf/weto_final_rep
7.
Criqui P.MimaS. (2008a). The development of the world energy system in the POLES reference projection, CASCADE-MINTS final report - EC DG RTD, p. 20.
8.
CriquiP.MimaS. (2008b). Results of the climate and energy policy analysis with the POLES model, report of MENGTECH: Modelling of Energy Technologies Prospective in a General and Partial Equilibrium Framework - EC DG TRD, p51.
9.
CriquiP.MimaS.MenanteauP. (2009). Trajectories of new energy technologies in carbon constraint cases with the POLES Model, IARU International Scientific Congress on Climate Change, p. 16.
10.
EdenhoferO.KnopfB.BarkerT.BaumstarkL.BellevratL.ChateauB. (2010). “The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs”. The Energy Journal, this Issue.
11.
FAO. (2007). FAOSTATdatabase, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Statistics Division.
12.
FisherG.SchrattenholzerL. (2001). “Global biomass potentials through 2050”. Biomass and Bioenergy, 20: 151-159.
13.
HoogwijkM.FaaijA.van den BroekR.BerndesG.GielenD.TurkenburgW. (2003). “Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy”. Biomass and Bioenergy, 25:. 119-133.
14.
HoogwijkM.FaaijA.EickhoutB.de VriesB.TurkenburgW. (2005). “Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios”. Biomass and Bioenergy, 29: 225-257.
15.
IPCC (2007), Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007 Technical Summary, fig 11 p42. MetzB.DavidsonO.R.BoschP.R.DaveR.MeyerL.A. (eds) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
LapillonneB.ChateauB.KitousA.CriquiP.MimaS., (2007). WETO-H2: World Energy Technology Outlook to 2050 with the POLES model, EC DG-RTD. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp6/ssp/weto_h2_en.htm
17.
UNEP (2009), The Environmental Food Crisis - The environment's role in averting future food crises”, Fig12 p30. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal.
18.
MimaS.KitousA.CriquiP. (2008). The European energy system in the context of long term climate policies, 9th IAEE European Conference Energy Markets and Sustainability in a Larger Europe, pp208.
19.
MimaS.CriquiP. (2006). World energy scenarios and international energy prices, LEPII-EPE Report in DG-TREN LREM2 project, January2006.
20.
OECD (2008), Uranium 2007: Resources, Production and Demand, A Joint Report by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency, OECD, Paris.
21.
StankeviciuteL.KitousA.CriquiP. (2008). “The fundamentals of the future international emissions trading system”. Energy Policy 36 (11)
22.
United Nations (2004), Population Prospects Estimates 2004 - Median scenario, United Nations Population Division.
23.
USGS (2000), US Geological Survey. World Petroleum assessment 2000. Available at: http://energy.cr.usgs.gov/WEReport.pdf
24.
Van VuurenD. P.Den ElzenM. G. J.LucasP.EickhoutB. E.StrengersB. J.Van RuijvenB.WoninkS.Van HoudtR. (2007). “Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs”. Climatic Change, 81, (2): 119-159.
25.
Van VuurenD. P.BellevratE.KitousA.IsaacM. (2010). “Bio-energy use and low stabilization scenarios”. The Energy Journal. Special Issue, this Issue.
26.
Van VuurenD. P.IsaacM.KundzewiczZ. W.ArnellN.BarkerT. (2009). “Scenarios as the Basis for Assessment of Mitigation and Adaptation”. In HulmeM.NeufeldtH. eds., Making climate change work for us - European Perspectives on Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
WEC (World Energy Council) (2007a), 2007 Survey on Energy Resources. WEC, London.
28.
WEC (2007b), Energy scenario development analysis: WEC policy to 2050 - A study with the POLES Model. WEC, London. Available at: http://www.enerdata.fr/docssales/WEC_quantitative_energy_scenarios_by_2050_(2007).pdf
