This study provides estimates of the price and Morishima substitution elasticities between energy and non-energy inputs in two Canadian energyintensive manufacturing industries: Primary Metal and Cement. The elasticities are estimated using annual industry-level KLEM data (1961-2003) and relying on two flexible functional forms: the Translog and the Symmetric Generalized McFadden (SGM) cost functions. In addition to the point estimates, the confidence intervals of the elasticities are computed using Studentized bootstrap resampling techniques. For both industries, the estimation results suggest that capital, labour, material and energy are pairwise substitutes and that energy is the most substitutable input. However, the low magnitudes of the estimated elasticities do not seem to offer great flexibility to these industries to adapt to high increases in energy prices.
AndrikopoulosA.A.BroxJ.A.ParaskevopoulosC.C. (1989). “Interfuel and Interfactor Substitution in Ontario Manufacturing, 1962-82.” Applied Economics, 21: 1667-1681.
2.
ApostolakisB.E. (1990). “Energy-Capital Substitutability/Complementarity.” Energy Economics, 12 (1): 48-58.
3.
BaldwinJ. R.GuW. (2007). “Multifactor Productivity in Canada: An Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Estimating Capital Services.” The Canadian Productivity Review, Catalogue no. 15-206-XIE2007009, Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
4.
BaldwinJ. R.GuW.YanB. (2007). “User Guide for Statistics Canada’s Annual Multifactor Productivity Program.” Research paper, The Canadian Productivity Review, Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 15-206-XIE—No. 14, Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
5.
BarnettA. H.KeithR.ThompsonH. (1998). “Electricity substitution: some local industrial evidence.” Energy Economics, 20(4): 411-419.
6.
BernardJ.T.IdoudiN.KhalafL.YelouC. (2007). “Finite Sample Multivariate Structural Change Tests with Application to Energy Demand Models.” Journal of Econometrics, 141(2): 1219-1244.
7.
BerndtE. R.JorgensonD. W. (1973). “Production Structures.” Chapter 3 in U.S. Energy Resources and Economic Growth, JorgensonD. W.HouthakkerH. S. eds. Washington: Energy Policy Project.
8.
BerndtE. R.WoodD. O. (1975). “Technology, Prices, and the Derived Demand for Energy.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 57(3): 259-268.
9.
BhattacharyyaS. C. (1996). “Applied General Equilibrium Models for Energy Studies: A Survey Energy Economics, 18(3): 145-164.
10.
BlackorbyC.RussellR. R. (1989). “Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up? A Comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities.” American Economic Review, 79: 882-888.
11.
ChristensenL.R.JorgensonD.W.LauL.J. (1971). “Conjugate Duality and the Transcendental Logarithmic Production Function.” Econometrica, 39: 255-256.
12.
ChristensenL.R.JorgensonD.W.LauL. J. (1973). “Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 55: 28-45.
13.
ChristopoulosDimitris K. (2000). “The Demand for Energy in Greek Manufacturing.” Energy Economics, 22(5): 569-586.
14.
DavidsonR.MacKinnonJ. G. (1999). “The Size Distortion of Bootstrap Tests.” Econometric Theory, 15: 361-376.
15.
DavidsonR.MacKinnonJ. G. (2002). “Fast Double Bootstrap Tests of Nonnested Linear Regression Models.” Econometric Reviews, 21: 417-427.
16.
DennyM.MayJ. D.PintoC. (1978). “The Demand for Energy in Canadian Manufacturing: Prologue to an Energy Policy.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 11(2): 300-313.
17.
DevarajanS.RobinsonS. (2005). “The Influence of Computable General Equilibrium Models on Policy.” In KehoeT. J.SrinivasanT. N.WhalleyJ. (eds.) Frontiers in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling In Honor of Herbert Scarf. pp. 402-428
18.
DiewertW. E. (1971). “An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function.” Journal of Political Economy, 79: 481-507.
19.
DiewertW. E.WalesT. J. (1987). “Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions.” Econometrica, 55: 43-68.
20.
EakinB. K.McMillenD. P.BuonoM. J. (1990). “Constructing Confidence Intervals Using the Bootstrap: An Application to a Multi-Product Cost Function.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(2): 339-44.
21.
EfronB. (1982). “The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans, Philadelphia.” Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Philadelphia, PA.
22.
EfronB.TibshiraniR. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York, Chapman and Hall.
23.
FussM.A. (1977). “The Demand for Energy in Canadian Manufacturing: An Example of the Estimation of Production Structures with Many Inputs.” Journal of Econometrics, 5, 1, 89-116.
24.
GervaisJ.P.BonroyO.CoutureS. (2008). “A Province-level Analysis of Economies of Scale in Canadian Food Processing.” Agribusiness (New York), 24(4):538-556.
25.
GriffinJ.M.GregoryP.R. (1976). “An Intercountry Translog Model of Energy Substitution Responses.” American Economic Review, 66: 845-857.
26.
HallP. (1992). “The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion.” New York, Springer-Verlag.
27.
HallP.HorowitzJ.L. (1996). “Bootstrap Critical Values for Tests Based on Generalized-Method-of-Moments Estimators.” Econometrica, 64(4): 891-916
28.
HansenL.P.HeckmanJ.J. (1996). “The Empirical Foundations of Calibration.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1): 87-104.
29.
HisnanickJ.J.KyerB.L. (1995). “Assessing a Disaggregated Energy Input.” Energy Economics, 17(2): 125-132.
30.
HorowitzJ.L. (1994). “Bootstrap-based Critical Values for the Information Matrix Test.” Journal of Econometrics, 61(2): 395-411.
31.
HughesJ.E.KnittelC.R.SperlingD. (2007). “Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand.” Centre for the Study of Energy Markets, University of California, Berkeley.
32.
IlmakunnasP.TormaH. (1989). “Structural Change in Factor Substitution in Finnish Manufacturing.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 91: 705-721.
33.
JacobyH.D.ReillyJ.M.McFarlandJ.R.PaltsevS. (2006). “Technology and Technical Change in the MIT EPPA Model.” Energy Economics, 28(5-6): 610-631.
34.
KemfertC. (1998). “Estimated Substitution Elasticities of a Nested CES Production Function Approach for Germany.” Energy Economics, 20(3): 249-264.
35.
KoetseM.J.de GrootH.L.F.FloraxR.J.G.M. (2008). “Capital-energy Substitution and Shifts in Factor Demand: A Meta-analysis.” Energy Economics, 30(5): 2236-2251
LawrenceD. (1989). “An Aggregator Model of Canadian Export Supply and Import Demand Responsiveness.” The Canadian Journal of Economics, 22(3): 503-521
38.
LiH.MaddalaG.S. (1999). “Bootstrap Variance Estimation of Nonlinear Functions of Parameters: an Application to Long-run Elasticities of Energy Demand.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(4): 728-733.
39.
LucasR. (1976). “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1: 19-46.
40.
MacKinnonJ. (2002). “Bootstrap Inference in Econometrics.” The Canadian Journal of Economics, 35(4): 615-645.
41.
McKitrickR.R. (1998). “The Econometric Critique of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling: The Role of Functional Forms.” Economic Modelling, 15(4): 543-573
42.
PetersL.SurryY. (2000). “Incorporating Price-Induced Innovation in a Symmetric Generalised McFadden Cost Function with Several Outputs” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 14: 53-70
43.
RaskK. (1995). “The Structure of Technology in Brazilian Sugarcane Production, 1975-87.” Journal of Applied Econometrics10: 221-232.
44.
RyanD.L.WalesT.J. (2000). “Imposing Local Concavity in the Translog and Generalized Leon-tief Cost Functions.” Economics Letters, 67: 253-260.
45.
SauerJ. (2006). “Economic Theory and Econometric Practice: Parametric Efficiency Analysis.” Empirical Economics, 31(4): 1061-1087
46.
StewartK.G.JonesJ.C.H. (2008). “Are Sports Teams Multiproduct Firms?” mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
47.
TaherM.A.McMillanM.L. (1984). “Production Relationships in Selected Canadian Manufacturing Industries with Disaggregated Material Inputs.” Resources and Energy, 6: 373-396
48.
ThompsonH. (2006). “The Applied Theory of Energy Substitution in Production.” Energy Economics, 28(4): 410-425
49.
ThompsonP.TaylorT. (1995). “The Capital-Energy Substitutability Debate: A New Look.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(3): 565-569.
50.
WileyD.E.SchmidtW.H.BrambleW.J. (1973). “Studies of a Class of Covariance Structure Models.” Journal of American Statistical Association, 68: 317-323.
