In the UNFCCC process, energy exporting countries (primarily OPEC) claim compensationfor losses in expected oil rent due to CO2 mitigation measures. However, there are mechanisms that may raise rather than lower the oil rent. If a carbon price is implemented universally, the cost of using oil substitutes such as unconventional oil or synthetic diesel from coal or natural gas will increase even more than the cost of using conventional oil. Here, a dynamic model that takes into account OPEC’s dominant position in the world’s liquid fuel market is developed in order to analyze these mechanisms. In this model, OPEC is assumed to act as strategic leader while all other liquid fuel producers act as price-takers. We find that the net present value of OPEC’s conventional oil rent increases by about 5% due to the carbon prices needed to reach stringent CO2 emission targets. For less ambitious targets, the increase in oil rent could be even higher. An extensive sensitivity analysis is also performed, which corroborates the main result.
AdelmanM.A. (1986). The competitive floor to world oil prices, MIT Energy Laboratory, Working paper No. MIT-EL 86-011WP.
2.
AdelmanM.A. (2002). “World oil production & prices 1947-2000.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance42 (2): 169-191.
3.
Alberta Chamber of Commerce (2004). Oil Sands Technology Roadmap - Unlocking the Potential, downloadable via www.acr-albereta.com.
4.
AlhajjiA.F. (2004). “OPEC Market Behavior”, eds. Cleveland, Encyclopedia of Energy
5.
AmundsenE.S.BergmanL.(2005). International Redistribution of resource rents: An Alternative Perspective on the Kyoto Process, Working paper in economics No. 08/05, Department of Economics, University of Bergen.
6.
Aarts P.JanssenD.(2003). “Shades of Opinion: The oil exporting countries and international climate policies.”, The Review of International Affairs, 3(2): 332-351.
7.
AzarC.LindgrenK.AnderssonB.A. (2003). “Global energy scenarios meeting stringent CO2 constraints - cost-effective fuel choices in the transportation sector.” Energy Policy31(10): 961-976.
8.
AzarC.LindgrenK.LarsonE.MollerstenK.(2006). “Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass - Costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere.” Climatic Change74(1-3): 47-79.
9.
BarnettJ.DessaiS. (2002). “Articles 4.8 and 4.9 of the UNFCCC: adverse effects and the impacts of response measures.” Climate Policy2(2-3): 231-239.
10.
BartschU.MullerB. (2000). Fossil fuels in a changing climate, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
11.
BernsteinP.MontgomeryD.RutherfordT.YangG.(1999). “Effects of restrictions on international permit trading: The MSMRT model.” The Energy Journal (special issue edited by Weyant, J.):221-256.
12.
BergE.KverndokkS.RosendahlK.E.(1997). “Market power, international CO2 taxation and oil wealth.” Energy Journal, 18 (4): 33-71.
13.
BP (2006). Statistical review of world energy, available via www.bp.com
14.
BrandtA.R. (2007). “Testing Hubbert.” Energy Policy, 35: 3074-3088.
15.
BrandtA.R.FarrellA.F.(2007). “Scraping the Bottom of the Barrel: Greenhouse gas emissions consequences of a transition to low-quality and synthetic petroleum resources.” Climatic Change, 84 (3-4): 241-263.
16.
CampbellC.J.LahrerrereJ.H.(1998). “The end of cheap oil.” Scientific American278(3): 78-83.
17.
ChakravortyU.KrulceD.RoumassetJ. (2005). “Specialization and non-renewable resources: Ricardo meets Ricardo.” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control29 (9): 1517-1545.
18.
ClarkeL.E.WiseM.PlacerM.IzaurraldeR.C.LurzJ.P.KimS.H.SmithS.J.ThomsonA.M. (2006). Climate Change Mitigation: Analysis of Advanced Technology Scenarios. PNNL-16078, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
19.
de VriesB.J.M.Van VuurenD.P.den ElzenM.G.J.JanssonM.A. (2001). The Targets IMage Regional (TIMER) Model. Technical Documentation. RIVM report 461502024.
20.
EswaranM.LewisT.(1985). “Exhaustible Resources and Alternative Equilibrium Concepts.” Canadian Journal of Economics18 (3): 459-473.
21.
GatelyD.HuntingtonH.G.(2002). “The asymmetric effects of changes in price and income on energy and oil demand.” Energy Journal23(1): 19-55.
22.
GhanemS.LounnasR.RennandG. (1999). “The impact of emissions trading on OPEC.” OPEC Review23: 79-112.
23.
GielenD.UnanderF.(2005). Alternative Fuels: An Energy Technology Perspective, IEA/ETO Working Paper, Office of Energy Technology and R&D, International Energy Agency (IEA).
24.
GilbertR.J. (1978). “Dominant Firm Pricing Policy in a Market for an Exhaustible Resource.” The Bell Journal of Economics9 (2): 385-395.
25.
GoodwinP.DargayJ.HanlyM. (2004). “Elasticities of road traffic and fuel consumption with respect to price and income: A review.” Transport review24(3): 275-292.
26.
GrahnM. (2006) Cost-Effective Fuel Choice in the Transport Sector Under Stringent CO2-Emission Reduction Strategies. Thesis for the Degree of Licentiate in Environmental Science, Division of Physical Resource Theory, Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden.
27.
Greene D.L.HopsonJ.L.LiJ. (2003). Running out of and into oil: Analyzing the global oil depletion and transition through 2050, Oak Ridge Natio?ial Laboratory, Report ORNL/TM-2003/259.
28.
GriffinJ.M.XiongW.W. (1997). “The incentive to cheat: An empirical analysis of OPEC.”, Journal of Law & Economics 40(2): 289-316.
29.
GrootF.WithagenC.de ZeeuwA.(2003). “Strong time-consistency in the cartel-versus-fringe model.” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control28: 287-306.
30.
GrubbM.. (2001). “Who’s afraid of atmospheric stabilization? Making the link between energy resources and climate change.” Energy Policy29. 837-845.
31.
HuntingtonH.G.(1994). “Oil price forecasting in the 1980s: What went wrong?” The Energy Journal15(2): 1-22.
32.
IEA (2005). Resources to Reserves - Oil and Gas Technologies for the Energy Markets of the Future, International Energy Agency, IEA/OECD, Paris, France.
33.
IEA (2006). Energy Technology Perspectives—Scenarios & Strategies to 2050, International Energy Agency, IEA/OECD, Paris, France.
34.
JohanssonD.J.A.AzarC. (2007). “A scenario based analysis of land competition between food and bioenergy production in the US.” Climatic Change82(3-4): 267-291.
35.
KarpL.NewberyD.M.(1993). “Intertemporal consistency issues in depletable resources.” Chapter 19, in Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, edsKneeseAllen V.SweeneyJames L.
36.
KaufmannRKBradfordABelangerL.H.MclaughlinJ.MikiY. (2008), “Determinants of OPEC production: implications for OPEC behavior.” Energy Economics30(2): 33-351.
37.
ManneA.S.RutherfordT.F.(1994). “International Trade in Oil, Gas and Carbon Emissions Rights: An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Model.” Energy Journal, 15(1), 57-76.
38.
McKibbinW.RossT.ShackletonR.WilcoxenP. (1999) “Emissions trading, capital flows and the Kyoto Protocol.” The Energy Journal (special issue edited by J. Weyant): 287-335.
39.
NakicenovicN.SwartR. (eds.), 2000, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Published for the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
40.
National Energy Board (2006), Canada’s Oil Sands - Opportunities and Challenges to 2015: An Update, An Energy Market Assessment June2006, available via www.neb-one.gc.ca
41.
Newbery D.M.G. (1981) “Oil Prices, Cartels, and the Problem of Dynamic Inconsistency.” The Economic Journal91(363): 617-646.
42.
OgdenJ.. (2004). Hydrogen as an Energy Carrier: Outlook for 2010, 2030 and 2050, Report to The Pew Center/National Council on Energy Policy, 10-50 Workshop, Washington, DC, March 25, 2004, Pew Center on Climate Change.
43.
PerssonT.AAzarC.LindgrenK.JohannssonD.J.A.(2007). “Major oil exporters may profit rather than lose, in a carbon constrained world.” Energy Policy35: 6346-6353.
44.
RadetzkiM. (2002). “What will happen to the producer prices for fossil fuels if Kyoto is implemented?” Energy Policy30: 357-369.
45.
RognerH.H. (1997). “An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources.” Annual Review of Energ and Environment22: 217-262.
46.
RognerH.H. (2000). “Energy Resources.” In World Energy Assessment - Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability, J. Goldemberg, eds, United Nations Development Programme, New York.
47.
SalantS.W. (1976). “Exhaustible Resources and Industrial Structure - Nash-Cournot Approach to World Oil Market.” Journal of Political Economy84(5): 1079-1093.
48.
SalantS.W. (1982). “Imperfect Competition in the International Energy Market - a Computerized Nash-Cournot model.” Operations Research30(2): 252-280.
49.
SmithJ.L. (2005) “Inscrutable OPEC? Behavioral tests of the cartel hypothesis.” The Energy Journal26(1):51-82.
50.
ThielemannT.SchmidtSS.GerlingJ.P. (2007). “Lignite and hard coal: Energy suppliers for world needs until the year 2100—An outlook.” International Journal of Coal Geology, 72(1): 1-14.
51.
UlphA.M.FolieG.M. (1980). “Exhaustible Resources and Cartels - an Intertemporal Nash-Cournot Model.” Canadian Journal of Economics12(4): 645-658.
52.
USGS2000GeologicalU.S. Survey World Petroleum Assessment 2000 - Description and Results., U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series - DDS-60, available via http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-060/.
53.
van den HoveS.le MenestrelM.De BettigniesH.C. (2002). “The oil industry and climate change: strategies and ethical dilemmas.” Climate Policy2: 3-18.
54.
Van Vuuren D.P.den ElzenM.G.J.BerkM.M.LucasP.EickhoutB.ErensH.Oostenrijk R. (2003). Regional costs and benefits of alternative post-Kyoto climate regimes: Comparison of variants of the Multi-stage and per capita convergence regime. Report 728001025, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
55.
WBGU (2003), Climate protection strategies for the 21st century: Kyoto and beyond. German Advisory Council on Global Change, (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat Der Bundesregierung Globale Umwelt-veranderungen - WBGU), Berlin, Germany.
