This paper discusses the lessons learned from electricity sector liberalization over the last 20 years. The attributes of reform models that have exhibited good performance attributes are identified, drawing on empirical analysis of market structure, behavior and performance in many countries. Wholesale and retail market competition and network regulation performance evidence are discussed. Technical, economic, and political challenges to improving the efficiency of what continue to be partial liberalization programs in many countries are considered.
AdibPZarnikauJ.. (2006). “Texas: The Most Robust Competitive Market in North America,” in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW., eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier. 383-418.
2.
AmundsenEBergmanL.vonN-H der Fehr. (2006). “The Nordic Electricity Markets: Robust By Design?,” in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW., eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier. 145-170.
3.
BaconR. W.Besant-JonesJ. E.. (2001). “Global Electric Power Reform, Privatization and Liberalization of the Electric Power Industry in Developing Countries.” Annual Reviews of Energy and the Environment26: 331-59.
4.
BeesleyM.LittlechildS.. (1989). “The Regulation of Privatized Monopolies in the United Kingdom,” Rand Journal of Economics, 20:3454-472.
5.
BertramG. (2006). “Restructuring the New Zealand Electricity Sector 1984-2005,” in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW., eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier. 203-234.
6.
BertramG.TwaddleD. (2005). “Price-Cost Margins and Profit Rates in New Zealand Electricity Distribution Networks: The Cost of Light Handed Regulation”, Journal of Regulatory Economics27(3): 281-307.
7.
Besant-JonesJ. E., ed. (1993). “Reforming the Policies for Electric Power in Developing Countries.” Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
8.
BorensteinS.BushnellJ.. (1999). “An Empirical Analysis of The Potential for Market Power in California’s Electricity Industry,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 47(3):285-323.
9.
BorensteinS. (2000). “The Trouble with Electricity Markets: Understanding California’s Restructuring Disaster,” Journal of Economic Perspectives16(1): 191-211.
10.
BorensteinS.BushnellJ.WolakF.. (2002). “Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California’s Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market,” American Economic Review, December, 92(5), 1376-1405.
11.
BorensteinS.JaskeM.RosenfeldA.. (2002). “Dynamic Pricing, Advanced Metering and Demand Response in Electricity Markets,” Center for the Study of Energy Markets Working Paper, University of California at Berkeley, October.
12.
BrunekreeftG.BauknechtD.. (2006). “Energy Policy and Investment in the German Power Market,” in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW., eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier. 235-264.
13.
BushnellJames B.WolframCatherine (2005). “Ownership Change, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: The Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generation Plants,” University of California Energy Institute, Center for the Study of Energy Markets, Working Paper WP-140. http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/PDF/csemwp140.pdf
14.
BushnellJ.MansurE.SaraviaC.. (2007). “Vertical Arrangements, Market Structure, and Competition: An Analysis of Restructured U.S. Electricity Markets,” American Economic Review, forthcoming.
15.
ByeT.HopeE.. (2006). “Electricity Market Reform: The Norweigen Experience,” in Sor-gardT. (ed), Competition and Welfare: the Norwegian Experience, Norwegian Competition Authority, http://www.kt.no/iKnowBase/Content/427537/CAPACITY%20F0R%20C0MPETITI0N.PDF
16.
California Public Utilities Commission. (2005). “Capacity Markets White Paper,” August 25.
17.
CarltonDennis. (1979). “Vertical Integration in Competitive Markets Under Uncertainty,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 27: 189-209.
18.
ChaoH.WilsonR.. (1987). “Priority Service: Pricing, Investment and Market Organization.” American Economic Review (77): 899-916.
19.
CoaseRonald. (1937). “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, 4:386-405.
20.
ChisariO.EstacheA.RomeroC.. (1997). “Winners and Losers from Utility Privatization in Argentina: Lessons from a General Equilibrium Model.” World Bank Working Paper No. 1824, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
21.
CramtonP.StoftS.. (2006). “The Convergence of Market Designs for Adequate Generating Capacity,” Working Paper, April, http://stoft.com/metaPage/lib/Cramton-Stoft-EOB-2006-04-ICAP-energy-convergence.pdf
22.
De AraujoJ. L. R. H. (2001). “Investment in the Brazilian ESI—What Went Wrong? What Should Be Done?” Institute of Economics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
23.
DomahP.D.PollittM.G.. (2001). “The Restructuring and Privatisation of the Regional Electricity Companies in England and Wales: A social cost benefit analysis,” Fiscal Studies, 22(1):107-146.
24.
DynerI.ArangoS.LarsenE. (2006). “Understanding the Argentinian and Columbian Electricity Markets,” in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW., eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier. 595-616.
25.
EstacheA.Rodriguez-PardinaM.. (1998). “Light and Lightening at the End of the Public Tunnel: The Reform of the Electricity Sector in the Southern Cone,” World Bank Working Paper, May.
26.
EvansJ.E.GreenR.J.. (2005). “Why Did British Electricity Prices Fall After 1998?,” Department of Economics Working Paper 05-13, University of Birmingham. http://ideas.repec.org/p/bir/birmec/05-13.html.
27.
GilbertR.NeuhoffK.NewberyD.. (2004). “Allocating Transmission to Mitigate Market Power in Electricity Networks,” Rand Journal of Economics, 35(4), 691-709.
28.
GotoM.YajimaM., “A New Stage in Electricity Liberalization in Japan: Issues and Expectations,” in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW., eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier. 617-644.
29.
GreenR. (2000). “Can Competition Replace Regulation for Small Utility Customers?,” Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper 2405.
30.
GreenR. (2005a). “Electricity and Markets” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 21, no.1, pp. 67-87.
31.
GreenR. (2005b). “Restructuring the Electricity Industry in England and Wales” in GriffinJ.M.PullerS.L. (eds) Electricity Deregulation: Choices and Challenges, pp. 98-144, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
32.
GreenR.McDanielT. (1998). “Competition in Electricity Supply: Will ‘1998’ Be Worth It?,” Fiscal Studies, Vol.19, No.3, pp.273-93.
33.
GreenR.NewberyD. (1992). “Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market, Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 929-53.
34.
HarveySMcConiheB.PopeS.. (2006). “Analysis of the Impact of Coordinated Electricity Markets on Consumer Electricity Charges,” November, mimeo. LECG, Inc.
35.
HaasR. (2006). “Competition in the Continental European Electricity Market: Despair or Work in Progress in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW., eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier. 265-316.
36.
HenneyA. (1994). A Study of Privatization of the Electricity Supply Industry in England and Wales, EEE Limited, London.
37.
HoganW. (1992). “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 4: 211-242.
38.
HuntS. (2002). Making Competition Work in Electricity, New York, Wiley.
39.
ISO New England. (2005). “2004 Annual Markets Report.” http://www.iso-ne.com/markets/mkt_anlys_rpts/annl_mkt_rpts/2004/2004_annual_markets_report.doc.
40.
JamasbT. (2002). Reform and Regulation of The Electricity Sectors in Developing Countries, June 2002, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
41.
JamasbT.PollittM.. (2007). “Incentive Regulation of Electricity Distribution Networks,” June. http://www.electricitypolicy.org.uk/pubs/wp/eprg0701.pdf.
42.
JoskowP. L. (1998a). “Electricity Sectors in Transition.” Energy Journal19:25-62.
43.
JoskowPL. (1989). “Regulatory Failure, Regulatory Reform and Structural Change In The Electric Power Industry.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics. 125-199.
44.
JoskowP.L. (1997). “Restructuring, Competition and Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Electricity Sector.” Journal of Economic Perspectives11(3): 119-138.
45.
JoskowP. L. (1998). “Electricity Sectors in Transition.” Energy Journal19:25-62.
46.
JoskowP.L. (2000a). “Deregulation and Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Electric Power Sector.” In PeltzmanSamWinstonClifford, eds., Deregulation of Network Industries: What’s Next?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
47.
JoskowPJ. (2000b). “Regulating the Electricity Sector in Latin America, Comments 2000b,” Econo-mia, 1:199-215.
JoskowP.L. (2003). “Electricity Sector Restructuring and Competition: Lessons Learned,” Cuader-nosde Economia (Latin American Journal of Economics), 40: 548-558.
50.
JoskowP.L. (2005a). “The Difficult Transition to Competitive Electricity Markets in the United States.” Electricity Deregulation: Where To From Here?. (GriffinJ.PullerS., eds.), Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
51.
JoskowP.L. (2005b). “Transmission Policy in the United States,” Utilities Policy, 13, 2005, 95-115.
52.
JoskowP.L. (2005c). “Regulation and Deregulation After 25 Years: Lessons for Research,” Review of Industrial Organization, 26: 169- 193.
53.
JoskowP.L. (2005d). “Vertical Integration,” in MenardC.ShirleyM., eds., Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Springer.
54.
JoskowP.L. (2006a). “Markets for Power in the U.S.: An Interim Assessment,” The Energy Journal, 27(1), 1-36.
55.
JoskowP.L. (2006b.) “Incentive Regulation in Theory and Practice: Electric Transmission and Distribution,” Economic Regulation and Its Reform: What Have We Learned (RoseNancy, ed.), University of Chicago Press, forthcoming. http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/download_pdf.php?id=1220.
56.
JoskowP.L. (2006c). “Introduction to Electricity Sector Liberalization: Lessons Learned from CrossCountry Studies,” in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW.. Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, 1-32.
57.
JoskowP.L. (2006d). “Patterns of Transmission Investment,” Competitive Electricity Markets and Sustainability (LevequeFrancois, ed.), Edward Elgar, 2006.
58.
JoskowP.L. (2007). “Competitive Electricity Markets and Investment in New Generating Capacity,” in The New Energy Paradigm, HelmDieter, ed., Oxford University Press, 2007.
59.
JoskowP.L.KahnE.. (2002). “A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California’s Wholesale Electricity Market During Summer 2000,” The Energy Journal, 23(4), 1-35.
60.
JoskowP.L.RoseN.L.. (1989). “The Effects of Economic Regulation,” Handbook of Industrial Organization, (SchmalenseeR.WilligR., eds), North-Holland.
61.
JoskowP.L.SchmalenseeR.. (1983). Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electric Utility Deregulation, Cambridge,. MIT Press.
62.
JoskowP.L.TiroleJ.. (2000). “Transmission Rights and Market Power on Electric Power Networks,” Rand Journal of Economics, 31(3), 450-487.
JoskowP.L.TiroleJ.. (2007). “Reliability and Competitive Electricity Markets,” Rand Journal of Economics, 38(1), 60-84.
66.
LittlechildS. C. (2003). “Wholesale Spot Market Passthrough,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 23(1), 61-91.
67.
LizardoJ.de AraujoR.H., “The Case of Brazil: Reform By Trial and Error,” in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW., eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier. 565-595.
68.
MansurErin T. (2007). “Upstream Competition and Vertical Integration in Electricity Markets,” Journal of Law and Economics, 50(1): 125-56.
69.
MoranA. (2006). “The Electricity Industry in Australia: Problems Along the Way to a National Electricity Market,” in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW., eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier. 173-202.
70.
NewberyD. (1995). “Power Markets and Market Power,” Energy Journal, 16(3), 41-66.
71.
NewberyD. (1998). “The Regulator’s Review of the English Electricity Pool,” Utilities Policy, 7(3), 129-41.
72.
NewberyD. (2006). “Electricity Liberalization in Britain and the Evolution of Market Design,” in in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW.. Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier, 109-144.
73.
NewberyD.PollittM.. (1997). “The Restructuring and Privatization of Britain’s CEGB - Was it Worth It?” Journal of Industrial Economics, 45(3), 269-303.
74.
Nordic Competition Authorities. (2007). Capacity for Competition, No. 1/2007, http://www.kt.no/iKnowBase/Content/427537/CAPACITY%20FOR%20COMPETITION.PDF
75.
North American Reliability Corporation. (2007). Long Term Reliability Assessment, October. ftp://www.nerc.com/pub/sys/all_updl/docs/pubs/LTRA2007.pdf
76.
OrdoverJanuszSalopStevenSalonerGarth. (1990). “Equilibrium Vertical Foreclosure,” American Economic Review.80:127-42.
77.
PollittMichael. (2004a). “Electricity Reforms in Argentina: Lessons for Developing Countries,” CMI Working Paper 52, Electricity Policy Working Group, University of Cambridge http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/electricity/publications/wp/ep52.pdf.
78.
PollittMichael. (2004b). “Electricity Reforms in Chile: Lessons for Developing Countries,” CMI Working Paper 51, Electricity Policy Research Group, University of Cambridge. http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/eprg/pubs/index.html?paper=EP51&year=2004
79.
Public Utility Commission of Texas. (2007). Scope of Competition in Electricity Markets: Report to the 80th Texas Legislature, January. http://www.puc.state.tx.us/electric/reports/scope/index.cfm
80.
RaineriRicardo. (2006). “Chile: Where it All Started,” in in F.SioshansiW.Pfaffenberger. Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier, 77-108.
81.
RiordanMichael. (1998). “Anticompetitive Vertical Integration by a Dominant Firm,” American Economic Review, 88: 1232-48.
82.
RudnickH. (1996). “Pioneering Electricity Reform in South America,” IEEE Spectrum, August, 38-45.
83.
RudnickH. (1998). “Market Restructuring in South America,” IEEE Power Engineering Review, June, 3-6.
84.
RudnickH.ZolezziJ.. (2001). “Electric Sector Deregulation and Restructuring in Latin America: Lessons to be Learnt and Possible Ways Forward.” In IEEE Proceedings Generation, Transmission and Distribution148: 180-84.
85.
SaliesE.Waddams PriceC.. (2004). “Charges, Costs, and Market Power: The Deregulated UK Electricity Retail Market.” The Energy Journal25(3): 19-37.
86.
SchmalenseeR. (1989). “Good Regulatory Regimes,” Rand Journal of Economics, 20:3417-436.
87.
SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW.. (2006). Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier, Kidlington, Oxford, UK.
88.
StoftS. (2002). Power System Economics, Wiley Interscience.
89.
SweeneyJ. (2006). “California Electricity Restructuring, Crisis and Its Aftermath,” in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW., eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier. 319-382.
90.
SweetingA. (2007). “Market Power in the England and Wales Wholesale Electricity Market,” Economic Journal117 (520), 654-685.
91.
TrebilockM.HrabR., “Electricity Restructuring in Canada,” in SioshansiF.Pfaffen-bergerW., eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier. 419-450.
92.
TschamlerTaff, “Competitive Retail Power Markets and Default Service: The U.S. Experience, in SioshansiF.PfaffenbergerW., eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Elsevier. 529-562.
93.
WilliamsonOliver. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.
94.
WilliamsonOliver. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
95.
WolframCatherine. (1999). “Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market,” American Economic Review89(4), 805-826.
96.
World Bank, (1994). Infrastructure for Development: World Development Report 1994.
97.
YuW.JamasbT.PollittM.. (2007). “Incorporating the Price of Quality Into Efficiency Analysis: The Case of Electricity Distribution Regulation in the UK,” Electricity Policy Research Group, Working Paper EPRG 0713, University of Cambridge, http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/eprg/pubs/index.html?paper=EPRG0713&year=2007.