Using a panel of household travel diary data collected in Germany between 1997 and 2005, this study assesses the effectiveness of fuel efficiency improvements by estimating the rebound effect, which measures the extent to which higher efficiency causes additional travel. Following a theoretical discussion outlining three alternative definitions of the rebound effect, the econometric analysis generates corresponding estimates using panel methods to control for the effects of unobservables that could otherwise produce spurious results. Our results, which range between 57% and 67%, indicate a rebound that is substantially larger than obtained in other studies, calling into question the efficacy of policies targeted at reducing energy consumption via technological efficiency.
BaltagiB.H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Third edition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2.
BeckerG.S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. Economic Journal75, 493-517.
3.
BerkhoutP.H.G.MuskensJ.C.VelthuisjenJ.W. (2000). Defining the Rebound Effect. Energy Policy28, 425-432.
4.
BinswangerM. (2001). Technological Progress and Sustainable Development: What About the Rebound Effect?Ecological Economics36, 119-132.
5.
BrannlundR.GhalwashT.NordstromJ. (2007). Increased Energy Efficiency and the Rebound Effect: Effects on Consumption and Emissions. Energy Economics29, 1-17.
6.
BrookesL. (2000). Energy Efficiency Fallacies Revisited. Energy Policy28, 355-367.
7.
BrookesL.G. (1990). The Greenhouse Effect: The Fallacies in Energy Efficiency Solution. Energy Policy18 (2), 199-201.
GoodwinP.DargayJ.HanlyM. (2004). Elasticities of Road Traffic and Fuel Consumption with Respect to Price and Income: A Review. Transport Reviews24 (3), 275-292.
10.
GreeneD.L.KahnJ.R.GibsonR.C. (1999). Fuel Economy Rebound Effect for U.S. Household Vehicles. The Energy Journal20 (3), 1-31.
11.
GreeneD.L. (1992). Vehicle Use and Fuel Economy: How big is the “Rebound” Effect?The Energy Journal13 (1), 117-143.
12.
GreeningL.A.GreeneD.L. (1997). Energy Use, Technical Efficiency, and the Rebound Effect: A Review of the Literature. Report to the Office of Policy Analysis and International Affairs, US Department of Energy, Washington DC.
13.
GreeningL.A.GreeneD.L.DifiglioC. (2000). Energy Efficiency and Consumption - the Rebound Effect - A Survey. Energy Policy28 (6-7), 389-401.
14.
HenleyJ.RudermanH.LevineM.D. (1988). Energy Saving Resulting from the Adoption of More Efficient Appliances: A Follow-Up. The Energy Journal9 (2), 163-170.
15.
KhazzoomD.J. (1980). Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency Standards for Household Appliances. The Energy Journal1, 21-40.
16.
LovinsA.B. (1988). Energy Saving Resulting from the Adoption of More Efficient Appliances: Another View. The Energy Journal9 (2), 155-162.
17.
MiD (Mobility in Germany) (2007). German Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs. http://www.kontiv2002.de/publikationen.htm
MWV (Association of the German Petroleum Industry) (2007). http://www.mwv.de
20.
SaundersH.D. (1992). The Khazzoom-Brookes Postulate and Neoclassical Growth. The Energy Journal13 (4), 131-148.
21.
SmallK.A.Van DenderK. (2007). Fuel Efficiency and Motor Vehicle Travel: The Declining Rebound Effect, The Energy Journal28 (1), 25-52.
22.
SchipperL.GrubbM. (2000). On the Rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries. Energy Policy28, 367-388.
23.
SorrellS. (2007). The rebound effect: An assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC). Review of evidence for the rebound effect. www.ukerc.ac.uk.
24.
SorrellS.DimitroupoulosJ. (2008). The Rebound Effect: Microeconomic Definitions, Limitations, and Extensions. Ecological Economics65 (3), 636-649.
25.
StutzerA.FreyB.S. (2007). Commuting and life satisfaction in Germany. Informationen zur Rau-mentwicklung Heft2/3, 179-189.
26.
WalkerI.O.WirlF. (1993). Asymmetric Energy Demand due to Endogenous efficiencies: An empirical investigation of the transport sector. The Energy Journal14, 183-205.
27.
WestS.E. (2004). Distributional Effects of Alternative Vehicle Pollution Control Policies. Journal of Public Economics88 (3-4), 735-757.
28.
WirlF. (1997). The Economics of Conservation Programs. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.
