This study analyses the un-priced environmental harm caused by generating electricity from fossil fuels in the ECAR control region south of the Great Lakes in 2004 and again in 2015 when the recent Clean Air Interstate Rule will have its full effect. Using existing damage values, we estimate wholesale electricity under-pricing for coal-fired plants at about $40 per MWh in 2004, almost as much again as the $45/MWh actual price. Averaging across all fuels, the price of electricity was more than $30/MWh too low. The under-pricing will still be $18/MWh for coal plants and $15 for all generation sources in 2015, a decade after CAIR was adopted. Recognizing this environmental price now could reduce pollution levels, increase energy conservation and lead to wiser choices of new generation technology.
BanzhafSpencerBurtrawDallasPalmerKaren (2004). “Efficient Emission Fees in the US Electricity Sector.” Resource and Energy Economics, 26: 317-341.
2.
BovenbergA. LansGoulderLawrence H. (1996). “Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: General-Equilibrium Analysis.” American Economic Review, 86(4): 9851000.
3.
BurtrawDallasPalmerKarenKrupnikAlan J. (1997). “Second-Best Adjustments to Externality Estimates in Electricity Planning with Decomposition.” Land Economics, 73(2): 224-39.
4.
Cantor Fitzgerald (2007). Personal communication, April4, 2007.
5.
DaviesJ. ClarenceMazurekJan (1998). Pollution Control in the United States. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future Press.
6.
DSSRWDI (2005). “Cost-Benefit Analysis: Replacing Ontario’s Coal-Fired Electricity Generation.” Report submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Energy, April, 2005, http://www.energy.gov.on.ca/eng-lish/pdf/electricity/coal_cost_benefit_analysis_april2005.pdf, viewed December, 2005.
7.
Myrick, IIIFreeman A. (2002). “Environmental Policy Since Earth Day I: What Have We Gained?” Journal of Economic Perspectives16(1): 125-146.
8.
GillinghamKennethNewellRichard G.PalmerKaren (2004). “Retrospective Examination of Demand-Side Energy Efficiency Policies.” RFF Discussion Paper DP 04-19, Sept., 2004: Washington, D.C. http://www.rff.org/rff/Documents/RFF-DP-04-19REV.pdf, May 28, 2006.
9.
GreenLaura C.ArmstrongSarah R. (2003). “Particulate matter in ambient air and mortality: toxicologic perspectives,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology38: 326.
10.
JoskowPaul L. (2006). “Markets for Power in the United States: An Interim Assessment.” The Energy Journal27(1): 1-36.
11.
JoskowPaul L.SchmalenseeRichard (1983). Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electric Utility Deregulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12.
National Commission on Energy Policy (2004). “Ending the Energy Stalemate.” www.energycommis-sion.org, Accessed March 22, 2006.
13.
Ontario Power Authority, Ontario Energy Board (2006). “Joint Report to the Minister of Energy: Recommendations on a Standard Offer Program for Small Generators Connected to a Distribution System.” http://www.oeb.gov.on.ca/documents/cases/EB-2005-0463/standard_reportominister_210306.pdf, March 17, 2006, accessed 23 March, 2006.
14.
PalmerKarenBurtrawDallas (2005). “Cost-Effectiveness of Renewable Electricity Policies.” Energy Economics27: 873-894.
15.
PalmerKarenBurtrawDallasShihJhih-Shyang (2005). “Reducing Emissions from the Electricity Sector.” Resources for the Future. Discussion Paper 05-23. Washington: RFF.
16.
ParryIan W.H. (2003). “Fiscal Interactions and the Case for Carbon Taxes over Grandfathered Carbon Permits.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy19(3): 385-399.
17.
PearceD.W.ClineW.R.AchantaA.N.FankhauserS.PachauriR.K.TolR.S.J.VellingaP. (1996). “The Social Costs of Climate Change: Greenhouse Damage and the Benefits of Control.” Chapter 6 in Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, James P. Bruce, Hoesung Lee, Eric F. Haites, eds, IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18.
TolRichard S. J. (1999). “The Marginal Costs of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” The Energy Journal20(1): 61-81.
19.
US Department of Energy (2004). Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Program, 2004, “Wind Power Today & Tomorrow.” http://www.nrel.gov. Accessed 23 March, 2006.
20.
US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (2005). “1990-2004 Net Generation by State by Type of Producer by Energy Source (EIA-906),” and “1990-2004 U.S. Electric Power Industry Estimated Emissions by State (EIA-767 and EIA-906).” http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/elec-tricity/epa/epa_sprdshts.html, Accessed May, 2006.
21.
US Environmental Protection Agency (2005a). Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Clean Air Interstate Rule. Office of Air and Radiation, EPA-452/R-05-002, March, 2005, Washington D.C., http://www.epa.gov/cair/technical.html#final, accessed April 3, 2006.
22.
US Environmental Protection Agency (2005b). Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Clean Air Interstate Rule, IPM Parsed File EPA Final CAIR parsed for year 2015 (Final CAIR modeling), at http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/epa-ipm/iaqr.html, accessed April 3, 2006.
23.
US EPA (2005c). Evaluating Ozone Control Programs in the Eastern United States: Focus on the NOX Budget Trading Program, 2004.” EPA 454-K-05-001, August, 2005, Washington, D.C., http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/2005/ozonenbp.pdf, accessed April 11, 2006.
24.
VarianHal R. (1990). Intermediate Microeconomics: a Modern Approach, 2nd edn. WW Norton: New York.
25.
YapDavidReidNevilleDe BrouGaryBloxamRobertPicheEdChanWalterChengChristinaBitzosMelyndaWongSunnyHarper ConsultingD.S.Management ConsultantsDSSPotvin Air Management Consulting (2005). Transboundary Air Pollution in Ontario, Ontario Ministry of the Environment.
