The proper design of price interventions in energy markets requires consideration of equity and efficiency effects. In this paper, budget survey data from 29,000 Indonesian households are used to estimate a demand system for five energy sources, which is identified by the spatial variation in unit values (expenditures divided by quantities). We correct for the various quality and measurement error biases that result when unit values are used as proxies for market prices. The price elasticities are combined with tax and subsidy rates to calculate the marginal social cost of price changes for each item. The results suggest that even with high levels of inequality aversion there is a case for reducing the large subsidies on kerosene in Indonesia, supporting the reforms that have been announced recently.
AhmadE.SternN. (1984). “The theory of reform and Indian indirect taxes” Journal of Public Economics25 (3): 259-298.
2.
AttanasioO.FrayneC. (2006). “Do the poor pay more?” Paper presented at the Eighth BREAD Conference, Cornell University, May2006.
3.
BBC News (2005). “Indonesia clashes over fuel hike” [On-line] Availablehttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4296320.stm
4.
CreedyJ. (1996). “Measuring income inequality” Australian Economic Review29(2): 236-246.
5.
DeatonA. (1988). “Quality, quantity, and spatial variation of price” American Economic Review78(3): 418-430.
6.
DeatonA. (1990). “Price elasticities from survey data: Extensions and Indonesian results” Journal of Econometrics44(3): 281-309.
7.
DeatonA. (1997). The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
8.
DeatonA. (1998). “Getting prices right: what should be done?” Journal of Economic Perspectives12(1): 37-46.
9.
DickH. (1980). “The oil price subsidy, deforestation and equity” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies16(3): 32-60.
10.
Economist (2005). “Indonesia’s ropey Rupiah” September 1st. [On-line] Available http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4355717
11.
GibsonJ. (2006). “A simple test of liquidity constraint and whether the poor pay more” Paper presented at the NEUDC 2006 Conference, Cornell University, September2006.
12.
International Energy Agency (1999). World Energy Outlook: Looking at Energy Subsidies, Getting the Prices Right. International Energy Agency: Paris.
13.
Jakarta Post (2005). “Indonesia may cut fuel subsidies by as much as 60 percent by November” [Online] Availablehttp://www.thejakartapost.com/detaillatestnews.asp?fileid=20050908120004&irec=6
14.
Kompas (2005). “Dana kompensasi BBM: 40 juta orang dapat subsidi secara langsung” [On-line] Availablehttp://www.kompas.com/utama/news/0507/27/011328.htm
15.
KoshalR.KoshalM.BoydR.RachmanyH. (1999). “Demand for kerosene in developing countries: a case of Indonesia” Journal of Asian Economics10(3): 329-336.
16.
MaddenD. (1996). “Marginal tax reform and the specification of consumer demand systems” Oxford Economic Papers48(4): 556-567.
17.
NewberyD. (2005) “Why tax energy? Towards a more rational policy” The Energy Journal26(3): 1-40.
18.
NicitaA. (2004). “Efficiency and equity of a marginal tax reform: income, quality and price elasticities for Mexico” World Bank Policy Working Paper No. 3266, World Bank, Washington DC.
19.
PittM. (1985). “Equity, externalities and energy subsidies: The case of kerosene in Indonesia” Journal of Development Economics17 (3): 201-217.
20.
PradhanM. (2001). “Welfare analysis with a proxy consumption measure: Evidence from a repeated experiment in Indonesia” Cornell Food and Nutrion Policy Program Working Paper No. 126.
21.
PraisS. (1958). Whose cost of living? Review of Economic Studies 26(1): 126-134.
22.
SenK.SteerL. (2005). “Survey of recent developments” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies41(3): 273-304.
23.
SumartoS.SuryahadiA. (2001). “Kerosene: Government subsidies and household consumption” SMERU Newsletter No. 2, March-April, 2001, pp 1-4 <http://smeru.or.id/newslet/2001/ed02/200102data.htm>
24.
YitzhakiS.LewisJ. (1996). “Guidelines on searching for a Dalton-improving tax reform: An illustration with data from Indonesia” World Bank Economic Review10(3): 541-562.
25.
World Bank (2005). Indonesia: Economic and Social Update, October. World Bank, Jakarta.
