A number of authors have noted that recent changes in the liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry are likely to favor shorter term multilateral trades of LNG relative to long term bilateral and project-specific contracts. We present a model in which expectations of such a change in market structure alter investment behavior in a way that reinforces the original tendency. The result is that the structure of the natural gas market could change quite quickly, as happened previously in the world oil market.
Deutsche Bank (2003). “LNG: Going... Going... Gone Global.” London, Global Equity Research (2 May, 2003).
2.
DiamondP. A.MaskinE. (1979). “An Equilibrium Analysis of Search and Breach of Contract, I: Steady States.” The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1): 282-316.
3.
DiamondP. A. (1984). “Money in Search Equilibrium.” Econometrica, 52(1): 1-20.
4.
EllsworthC. (2001). “Atlantic Basin LNG and Its Impact On Asian Markets.” Presentation to James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy Workshop “New Energy Technologies in the Natural Gas Sector: A Policy Framework for Japan.” Rice University, April 2-3, 2001.
5.
Energy Information Administration (EIA), (2003). “The Global Liquefied Natural Gas Market: Status and Outlook.” Available athttp://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/analysispaper/global/pdf/eia_0637.pdf Energy Information Administration (EIA), (2004a). “World LNG Market Structure.” Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/analysispaper/global/lngmarket.html
6.
Energy Information Administration (EIA), (2004b). “LNG Industry Costs Declining.” Available athttp://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/analysispaper/global/lngindustry.html Hartley P. R. and D. L. Brito, (2001). “Using Sakhalin Natural Gas in Japan.” James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy working paper available at http://www.rice.edu/energy/publications/newenergytechnologies_gassectors.html
7.
HartleyP. R.MedlockK. B. III, (2006). “The Baker Institute World Gas Trade Model.” Natural Gas and Geopolitics: From 1970 to 2040, edited by DavidG.DavidG.VictorAmyM. JaffeMarkH. Hayes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
International Energy Agency, (2003). World Energy Investment Outlook, 2003 Insights. Paris: International Energy Agency.
9.
International Energy Agency, (2004). World Energy Outlook. Paris: International Energy Agency.
10.
JensenJ.T. (2003). “The LNG Revolution.” The Energy Journal24(2): 1-45.
11.
ShookB.JaffeA.M. (2001). “Developments in Atlantic Basin LNG: Implications for Japan.” James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, working paper, September.
12.
SiliverstovsB.L’HegaretG.NeumannA.von HirschhausenC. (2005). “International market integration for natural gas? A cointegration analysis of prices in Europe, North America and Japan.” Energy Economics27(4): 603-615.
