The objective of this paper is to assess the likely allocation effects of the current climate protection strategy as it is laid out in the National Allocation Plans (NAPs) for the European Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). The multi-regional, multi-sectoral CGE-model DART is used to simulate the effects of the current policies in the year 2012 when the Kyoto targets need to be met. Different scenarios are simulated in order to highlight the effects of the grandfathering of permits to energy-intensive installations, the use of the project-based mechanisms (CDM and JI), and the restriction imposed by the supplementarity criterion.
CriquiRKitousA.. (2003). “Kyoto Protocol implementation, impacts of linking JI and CDM credits to the European emission allowance trading scheme (KPI-ETS)”. Prepared for the Directorate-General Environment.
2.
Energy Information Agency (EIA). (2002). “International Energy Outlook 2002”. Washington, D.C.
3.
EllisJ.Corfee-MorlotJ.WinklerH.. (2004). “Taking Stock Of Progress Under The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)”. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) COM/ENV/EPC/IEA/SLT(2004)4/FINAL. OECD, Paris.
4.
European Commission. (2004a). Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on Commission Decisions of 7th July 2004 concerning national allocation plans for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances of Austria, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC. COM(2004) 500 final, Brussels.
5.
European Commission. (2004b). Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on Commission Decisions of 20th October 2004 concerning national allocation plans for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances of Belgium, Estonia, Finland, France, Latvia, Luxemburg, Portugal, and the Slovak Republic in accordance with Directive 2003/87/ECCOM(2004) 681 final, Brussels.
6.
European Commission (2004c). Report from the Commission “Catching up with the Community’s Kyoto target”. COM(2004) 818 final, Brussels.
7.
HaitesE.SeresS.. (2004). Estimating the Market Potential for the Clean Development Mechanism: Review of Models and Lessons Learned. Prepared for World Bank Carbon Finance Business PCFplus Research program, the International Energy Agency and the International Emissions Trading Association. PCFplus Report 19. Washington, D.C.
8.
KlepperG.PetersonS.. (2004). “The EU Emissions Trading Scheme - Allowance Prices, Trade Flows and Competitiveness Effects”. European Environment14: 201-218.
9.
KlepperG.PetersonS.. (2005). “Trading Hot-Air - The Influence of Permit Allocation Rules, Market Power and the US Withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol”. Environmental and Resource Economics32(3): 205-227.
10.
KlepperG.PetersonS.SpringerK.. (2003). DART97: A Description of the Multi-regional, Multisectoral Trade Model for the Analysis of Climate Policies. Kiel Working Papers 1149. Kiel Institute for World Economics. Kiel.
11.
LangrockT.SterkW.. (2004). The Supplementarity Challenge: CDM, JI &EU Emissions Trading. Policy Paper 1/2004. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. Wuppertal.
12.
LecocqF. (2005). State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2005. International Emissions Trading Association (IETA). Washington, D.C.
13.
LückgeH.PetersonS.. (2004). The Use of CDM and JI for Fulfilling the European Kyoto Commitments. Kiel Working Paper 1232. Kiel Institute for World Economics. Kiel.
14.
MichaelowaA.Stronzik;M.EckermannF. A. Hunt. (2003). “Transaction Costs of the Kyoto Mechanisms”. Climate Policy3: 261-278.
15.
SvendsenG.T.VesterdalM.. (2003). “Potential gains from CO2 trading in the EU”. European Environment13: 303-313.
16.
SpringerK. (2002). Climate Policy in a Globalizing World: A CGE Model with Capital Mobility and Trade. Kieler Studien. Berlin: Springer.
17.
World Bank. (2004). Clean development mechanism in China: taking a proactive and sustainable approach. Published jointly by the Chinese Ministry for Science and Technology, GTZ (German Technical Cooperation) of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, SECE (Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs) and the World Bank. Washington D.C.
