'Oil Equivalence' is widely used to measure total hydrocarbon activity. Natural gas is converted to oil using a fixed factor, usually based on thermal measurement. In turn, expenditures on oil and gas are divided by such 'oil equivalence' volumes to define unit costs, especially of reserve additions. This approach lacks economic content. We show its implicit assumptions and constraints, and develop an alternative aggregation method using index numbers, with an example.
AdelmanM.A.WatkinsG.C. (2002). “Costs of Aggregate Hydrocarbon Reserve Additions.” MIT CEEPR 02-011 WP, December.
2.
AdelmanM.A.WatkinsG.C. (2003). “Oil and Natural Gas Reserve Prices: Implications for Depletion and Investment Cost.” MIT CEEPR 03-016 WP, October.
3.
BerndtE.R. (1978). “Aggregate Energy, Efficiency and Productivity Measurement,” Annual Review of Energy1978(3): 225-73.
4.
DiewartW.E. (1976). “Exact and Superlative Index Numbers,” Journal of Econometrics1976(4): 115-45.
5.
FisherI. (1922). The Making of Index Numbers, Boston, Houghton-Mifflin.
6.
LohrenzJ. (1998). “Buying and Selling Producible In Situ Oil and Gas on Wall Street and Other Markets.” IAEE North American Conference 1998, Proceedings pp. 209-217.
