During the Summer of 2000, wholesale electricity prices in California were nearly 500% higher than they were during the same months in 1998 or 1999. This price explosion was unexpected and has called into question whether electricity restructuring will bring the benefits of competition promised to consumers. The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors that explain this increase in wholesale electricity prices. We simulate competitive benchmark prices for Summer of 2000 taking account of all relevant supply and demand factors—gas prices, demand, imports from other states, and emission permit prices. We then compare the simulated competitive benchmark prices with the actual prices observed. We find that there is a large gap between our benchmark competitive prices and observed prices, suggesting that the prices observed during Summer 2000 reflect, in part, the exercise of market power by suppliers. We then proceed to examine supplier behavior during high-price hours. We find evidence that suppliers withheld supply from the market that would have been profitable for price-taking firms to sell at the market price.
BorensteinS.BushnellJ. (1999). “An Empirical Analysis of the Potential for Market Power in California's Electricity Industry,” Journal of Industrial Economics47(3): 285-323.
2.
BorensteinS.BushnellJ.WolakF. (2000). “Diagnosing Market Power in California's Deregulated Wholesale Electricity Market,” University of California Energy Institute Working Paper PWP-064, August2000, available at http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei/PDF/pwp064.pdf
3.
BorensteinS.BushnellJ.WolakF. (2002). “Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market,” University of California Energy Institute working paperCSEM WP102, June, 2002 available at http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/PDF/csemwpl02.pdf
4.
BorensteinS.BushnellJ.KnittelC.WolframC. (2001). “Trading Inefficiencies in California's Electricity Markets,” POWER working paper PWP 086, October, 2001 available at http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei/PDF/pwp086.pdf
5.
California Energy Commission (CEC, 2000). “Market Clearing Prices Under Alternative Resource Scenarios, 2000-2010,” Staff Report, March2000.
6.
California Independent System Operator (CAISO, 2000). Department of Market Analysis. “California Energy Market Issues and Performance: May-June, 2000,” August 10, 2000
7.
California Independent System Operator (CAISO, 2001). “CAISO 2001 Summer Assessment,” March22, 2001.
8.
California Power Exchange Corporation Compliance Unit (CaPX, 2000). “Price Movements in California Electricity Markets: Analysis of Price Activity May-July 2000,” September29, 2000.
9.
CardellJ. (2001). Testimony on behalf of Powerex, FERC Docket No. EL00-95-045, 2001.
10.
EllermanD.JoskowP.Schmalenseeand R.MonteroJ.BaileyE. (2000). Markets for Clean Air: The U.S. Acid Rain Program. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC, 1998). Staff Report to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on the Causes of Wholesale Electricity Pricing Abnormalities in the Midwest During June1998, September22, 1998.
12.
FERC (1999). “Capacity Sale and Tolling Agreement by and among AES Alamitos, L.L.C., AES Huntington Beach, L.L.C., AES Redondo Beach, L.L.C., and Williams Energy Services Company,” FERC Docket No. ER98-2184, -2185 and -2186, July15, 1999.
13.
FERC (2000). Staff Report to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Western Markets and the Causes of the Summer 2000 Price Abnormalities, November1, 2000.
14.
FERC (2001). Order Approving Stipulation and Consent Agreement 95. FERC 161,167, April 30, 2001. Docket No. IN01-3-001.
15.
Henwood Energy Services Incorporated (HESI, 2000). Database for the Western Systems Coordinating Council, 2000.
16.
HildebrandtE. (2000). Declaration of Eric Hildebrandt, FERC Docket Nos. EL00-95-000 and ELOO-98-OOO, October2000.
17.
HarveyS.HoganW. (2001a). “On the Exercise of Market Power Through Strategic Withholding in California,” Working Paper, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, April 24, 2001, at http://ksghome.harvard.edU/∼.whogan.cbg.ksg/.
18.
HarveyS.HoganW. (2001b). “Identifying the Exercise of Market Power in California,” Working Paper, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, December 28, 2001, at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/—.whogan.cbg.ksg/.
19.
JoskowP. (1989). “Regulatory Failure, Regulatory Reform and Structural Change in the Electric Power Industry,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 1989
20.
JoskowP. (1997). “Restructuring Competition and Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Electricity Sector.” Journal of Economic Perspectives11(3) Summer: 119-138.
21.
JoskowP. (2000). “Deregulation and Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Electric Power Sector,” in Deregulation of Network Industries: The Next Steps ( PeltzmanS. and WinstonClifford, eds), Brookings Press.
JoskowP.KahnE. (2001a). “A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California's Wholesale Electricity Market During Summer 2000,” NBER Working Paper 8157, March2001, at http://www.nber.org/papers/w8157.
24.
JoskowP.KahnE. (2001b). “Identifying the Exercise of Market Power: Refining the Estimates,” July 5, 2001, at http://econ.www.mit.edu/faculty/pjoskow/papers.htm.
25.
JoskowP.SchmalenseeR. (1983). Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electric Utility Deregulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
26.
KahnM.LynchL. (2000). “California's Electricity Options and Challenges: Report to Governor Gray Davis,” August2, 2000.
27.
KleinJ. (1998). “The Use of Heat Rates in Production Cost Modeling and Market Modeling,” 1998, at http://www.energy.ca.gov/papers/98-04-07_HEATRATE.PDF.
28.
North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC, 2000). Generating Availability Data System (GADS). “Generating Unit Statistical Brochure 1995-1999,” October2000.
29.
OverduinC. (1994). “Test Report Water Injection and Opacity Tests at Alamitos Generating Station Unit 7,” Southern California Edison Company Power Systems Engineering and Construction.
30.
SheffrinA. (2000). “Options for System Market Power Mitigation,” presentation to ISO Board Meeting, October4, 2000.
31.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE, 2000). “Report of the U.S. Department of Energy's Power Outage Study Team,” March2000.
32.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 1998). “Analyzing Electric Power Generation under the CAAA,” Appendix5: Pollution Control Performance and Costs, March1998.
33.
WolakF.NordhausR.ShapiroC. (2000). “An Analysis of the June 2000 Price Spikes in the California ISO's Energy and Ancillary Services Markets,” Report by the Market Surveillance Committee (MSC) of the California Independent System Operator (ISO), September 6, 2000
34.
WolframC. (1999). “Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market,” American Economic Review89(4): 805-826.
35.
WolframC. (1998). “Strategic Bidding in a Multi-Unit Auction: An Empirical Analysis of Bids to Supply Electricity in England and Wales,” RAND Journal of Economics29(4): 703-725.
