The Discovery Decline Phenomenon (DDP) requires that firm-level discoveries of a non-renewable resource depend, non-linearly, upon cumulative industry wide exploration. In this paper, an optimal rule for the exploration effort that adheres to the DDP is derived. Data from the United Kingdom Continental Shelf (UKCS) are applied to the model where it is found that cumulative exploration is a highly significant determinant of firm-level exploration, and that prices and taxes also determine exploration effort. The 'Hubbert peak’ in discoveries in the UKCS is estimated to be 1989 thereby improving upon previous estimates but also implying that the DDP in this region is already quite advanced.
ClevelandC. J.KaufmannR. K. (1991). “Forecasting Ultimate Oil Recovery and Its Rates of Production: Incorporating Economic Forces into the Models of M. King Hubbert.” The Energy Journal12(2): 17-46.
2.
EngleR. (1982). “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflations.” Economerrica50: 987-1008.
3.
FaveroC. (1992). “Taxation and the Optimisation of Oil Exploration and Production: The UK Continental Shelf.” Oxford Economic Papers44: 187-208.
4.
FullerW.A. (1996). Introduction to Statistical Time Series 2nd ed., John Wiley &Sons, USA.
5.
HausmanJ.A. (1978). “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica46: 1251-1271.
6.
HotellingH. (1931). “The Economics of Exhaustible Resources. ” Journal of Political Economy39: 137-75.
7.
HsiaoC. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
HubbertM. K. (1956). “Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels,” Drilling and Production Practice, Dallas Texas, American Petroleum Institute, pp. 7-25.
9.
HubbertM. K. (1969). “Energy resources,” In Resources and Man, National Research Council Committee on Resources and Man, Freeman, San Francisco, California.
10.
ImK. S.PesaranM. H.ShinY. (1996) “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels,” DAE Working Papers no. 9526, University of Cambridge, UK.
11.
KaufmanG. M. (1975). “Statistical Analysis of the Size Distribution of Oil and Gas Discovery .” In Studies in Petroleum, no. 1, AIME.
12.
KaufmannR. K. (1991). “Oil Production in the Lower 48 States: Reconciling Curve Fitting and Econometric Models.” Resources and Energy13: 111-127.
13.
MabroR. etal (1986). The Market for North Sea Oil. Oxford, UK: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
14.
MuthJ. (1961). “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements.” Econometrica39: 315-334.
15.
PesaranM. H. (1990). “An Econometric Analysis of Exploration and Extraction of Oil in the UK Continental Shelf.” The Economic Journal100: 367-390.
16.
PindyckR. S. (1978). “The Optimal Exploration and Production of Non-Renewable Resources.” Journal of Political Economy86: 841-861.
17.
UlilerR. S. (1976). “Costs and Supply in Petroleum Exploration: The case of Alberta.” Canadian Journal of Economics9: 72-90.
18.
United Kingdom Department of Trade and Industry (2000). Development of the Oil and Gas Reserves of the United Kingdom. London, UK: HMSO.
19.
WatkinsG. C. (2000). “Characteristics of North Sea Oil Reserve Appreciation,” MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Working Paper 2000-008, December.
