Using a complete information game-theoretic model, we analyze the performance of different electricity auction structures in attaining efficiency (i. e., least-cost dispatch). We find that an auction structure where generators are allowed to bid for load "slices" outperforms an auction structure where generators submit bids for different hours in the day.
HobbsB.RothkopfM.HydeL.O’NeillR. (1998). “Evaluation of Incentive Compatible Auction for Energy Markets with Nonconcave Benefits,” Working paper. Presented at the Fall 1998 INFORMS meeting, Seattle, Washington.
7.
IsaacR.JamesD. (1998). “Robustness of the Incentive Compatible Combinatorial Auction,” Maryland Auction Conference, May 29-31.
8.
JohnsonR.OrenS. S.SvobodaAlva J. (1997). “Equity and Efficiency of Unit Commitment in Competitive Electricity Markets.” Utilities Policy6(1): 9-19.
9.
MaskinE.Rileyand J., 1989, “Optimal Multi-unit Auctions,” in HahnFrank (ed.) The Economics of Missing Markets, Information, and Games. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 312-335.
10.
McAfeeP.McMillanJ. (1996). “Analyzing the Airwaves Auction,” Journal of Economic Perspectives10(1): 159-175.
11.
McMillanJ. (1994) “Selling Spectrum Rights,” Journal of Economic Perspectives8(3): 145-162.
12.
MilgromP. (1998). “Putting Auction Theory to Work: The Simultaneous Ascending Auction,” Maryland Auction Conference May 29-31.
13.
PatrickR. H.WolakF. A. (1997). “The Impact of Market Rules and Market Structure on the Price Determination Process in the England and Wales Electricity Market.” POWER Working Paper, PWP-047, University of California at Berkeley.
14.
RothkopfM. (1999). “Daily Repetition: A Neglected Factor in Analyzing Electricity Auctions,” The Electricity Journal, April.
