The first EMF study, "Energy and the Economy," produced estimates of the aggregate elasticity of substitution for primary energy implicit in six models of energy and the economy.' In that study, the working group identified the importance of the aggregate elasticity and called for an examination of more detailed demand models. During its review of the study, the EMF Senior Advisory Panel cited the importance of a careful investigation of energy demand models to clarify estimates of the aggregate elasticity. The present study is a response to those suggestions.
AndersonC. J.Energy Policy Model: A Brief Overview. UCRL-52672. Livermore, Calif.: Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, March1979
2.
BaughmanM. L.JoskowP. L.KamatD. P.Electric Power in the United States; Models and Policy Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1979
3.
CarhartS. C.MulherkarS. S.SanbornU.The Brookhaven Buildings Energy Conservation Optimization Model. BNL 50828. Upton, N.Y.: Brookhaven National Laboratory, January1978
4.
Dartmouth System Dynamics Group. FOSSIL I: Documentation, FOSSILI: Introduction to the Model, and FOSSIL!: Technical Appendix. Hanover, N.H.: Thayer School of Engineering. Dartmouth College, July1977
5.
DifiglioC.KulashD.. Marketing and Mobility: Report of the Panel of the InterAgency Task Force on Motor Vehicle Goals Beyond 1980. 1976-211-173/472. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, March1976
6.
Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc. Industrial Sector Technology Use Model (ISTUM): Industrial Energy Use in the United States, 1974-2000, Volumes 1-4. Contract #EX-76-C-OI-2344. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy. October1979.
7.
GriffinJ. M.Energy Conservation in the OECD: 1980-2000. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1979
8.
HirstE.CarneyJ. “The ORNL Residential Energy Use Model.” UvidEconomics55, No. 3 (August1979): 319-333.
9.
JacksonJ.CohnS.CopeJ.JohnsonW. F.The Commercial Demand for Energy: A Disaggregated Approach. ORNL/CON-15. Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, April1978
10.
LukachinskiJ.GronckiP. J.TessmerR. G.GoettleR. J.HudsonE. A.An Integrated Methodology for Assessing Energy-Economy Interactions. RNL-26452. Upton, N.Y.: Brookhaven National Laboratory, October1979
11.
ManneA. “ETA-MACRO: A Model of Energy-Economy Interactions.” In Modeling Energy-Economy Interactions, edited by HitchC. J., pp. 1—45. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1977. Also appears in Advances in the Economics of Energy and Resources, edited by R. Pindyck, Chapter 9. Greenwich. Conn.: JAI Press, 1978
12.
ParikhS. C.A Welfare Equilibrium Model (WEM) of Energy Supply. Energy Demand, and Economic Growth. SOL 79-3. Stanford, Calif.: Systems Optimization Laboratory, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, March1979.
13.
PindyckR.The Structure of World Energy Demand. Cambridge, Mass.: MITPress, 1979
14.
SchinkG. R.LoxleyC. J.. An Analysis of the Automobile Market: Modeling the Long-Run Determinants of the Demand for Automobiles. Volumes 1-3. DOT-TSC-NHTSA-79-49. Washington, D.C.: Department of Transportation, December1979
15.
SweeneyJ. L. “The Demand for Gasoline in the United States: A Vintage Capital Model.” In Workshops on Energy Supply and Demand Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1978
16.
SweeneyJ. L. (contributor). Aggregate Elasticity of Electricity Demand, vol. 2. EMF Report 4. Stanford, Calif.: Energy Modeling Forum, Stanford University, 1981 (forthcoming).
17.
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Project Independence Evaluation System: Documentation. Volumes 1-7. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy, September1977
