According to public opinion polls, many people in the United States do not agree that there is truly an energy crisis. President Carter referred to it as an "invisible" crisis in the National Energy Plan of 1977.
BatesonC. Daniel. “Rational Processing or Rationalization? The Effect of Disconfirming Information on a Stated Religious Belief.” Journal of Personality andSocio1 Psychology32 (1975): 176-176.
2.
BemD.J. “Self-Perception: An Alternative Interpretation of Cognitive Dissonance Phenomena.” Psychological Review74 (1967): 183-183.
3.
BowmanMary JaneBachG. L.Economic Analysis and Public Policy. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1943.
4.
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). Environmental Qualify. The Fourth Annual Report of the Council on Environmental Quality. September1973.
5.
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). “National Environmental Policy Act: Implementation of Procedural Provisions.” Federal Register, November29, 1978.
6.
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). Environmental Qualify. The Tenth Annual Report of the Council on Environmental Quality. December1979.
7.
CohenBernard L. “Society’s Valuation of Life Saving in Radiation Protection and Other Contexts.” Health Physics38, No. 1 (January1980): 33-51
8.
ComarC. L.SaganL. A. “Health Effects of Energy Production and Conversion.” In J. M.Hollander, ed., Annual Review of Energy1 (1976): 581-600).
9.
CONAES. Energy in Transition, 1985-2010. Final Report of the Committee on Nuclear and Alternative Energy Systems, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1979
10.
ConleyBryan C. “The Value of Human Life in the Demand for Safety.” American Economic Review (March1976):45.
11.
DuPontRobert L.Nuclear Phobia-Phobic Thinking About Nuclear Power. Washington, D.C.: The Media Institute, 1980.
12.
ElzioniAmitai. ”The Need to Put a Price on Life.” Washington Post, October29, 1978, p. C-1.
13.
FischhoffG.SlovicP., “How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Towards Technological Risks and Benefits.” Policy Science9 (1978): 127-127.
14.
FlynnC. B.ChalmersJ. A.The Social and Economic Effects of the Accident at Three Mile Island. NUREG-CR-1215. Report by Mountain West Research, Inc. with Social Impact Research, Inc. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, January1980
15.
FriedmanMiltonSavageL. I. “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk.” The Journal of Politica1 Economy (August1948): 279-304.
16.
GotchyReginald L.Health Effects Attributable to Coal and Nuclear Fuel Cycle Alternatives, NUREG-0332. Draft report of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. September1977.
17.
HitchCharles I.McKeanR. N.The Economics of Defense in the Nuclear Age. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960
18.
HohenemserC.KaspersonR.KatesR. “The Distrust of Nuclear Power.” Science (April1, 1977):25.
InhaberHerbert. “Risk with Energy from Conventional and Nonconventional Sources.” Science (February23, 1979): 718-723.
21.
KaspenonI. X.KaspenonR. E.HohenemserC.KatesR. W. “Institutional Responses to Three Mile Island.” The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 35, No. 1 (December1979): 20-24.
22.
KemenyJohn G.The Need for Change: The Legacy of TMI. Report of the President’s Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island. Washington, D.C., October1979.
23.
KneeseAllen V.SchulzeW. D. “Environment, Health, and Economics-The Case of Cancer.” American Economic Review (February1977): 331.
24.
LaveLester B.SeskinE. P. “Epidemiology, Causality, and Public Policy.” American Scientist (May-April1979): 178-186.
25.
LovinsAmory B.Soy Energy Paths. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1977.
26.
MacLeanDouglas. “Posterity.” Forthcoming as a chapter in Energy Policy and Our Obligations to Future Generations. A project of the University of Maryland, Center for Philosophy and Public Policy, sponsored by the National Science Foundation (EVIST), 1981.
27.
MattsonR.EmstM.MinnersW.SpanglerM. “Concepts. Problems and Issues in Developing Safety Goals and Objectives for Commercial Nuclear Power.” Nuclear Safety, 21, no. 6 (November-December1980).
28.
McKeanRoland N. “Criteria.” In QuadeEdward S., ed., Analysis for Military Decisions. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964.
29.
MelberBarbara D.NealeyS. M.Nuclear Power and the Public: Analysis of Collected Survey Research, PNL-2430. A Study prepared by the Battelle Human Affairs Research Centers for the Savannah River Operations Office of the U.S. Department of Energy. November1977.
30.
National Energy Plan. Washington. D.C.: Executive Office of the President, April29, 1977.
31.
Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC). Impacts of Later Reversing a Decision to Adopt or Not to Adopt an Interim Rule Permitting Construction or Operation of Nuclear Power Plants. Washington, D.C.: Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (available at the NRC Public Document Room), 1977.
32.
Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC). Anticipated Transients Without Scrum for Light Water Reactors, NUREG-0460, Vol. 2, Appendix 12, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, April1978.
33.
O’TooleThomas. “Solar Advocates Putting the Heat on Fossil Fuels.” Washington Post, January 9, 1980.
34.
Pahner. Philip D. “A Psychological Perspective of the Nuclear Energy Controversy.” Joint research report of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, August1976, pp. 1
35.
PollardWilliam G. “A Theological View of Nuclear Energy.” Nuclear News (February1979):82.
36.
QuadeEdward S. “Pitfalls in Systems Analysis.” In Analysis for Military Decisions. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964.
37.
RescherNicholas. Introduction to Value Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
38.
Rescher. Unselfishness: The Role of the Vicarious Affects in Moral Philosophy and Social Theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1975.
39.
SchurrSam H. “America’s Energy Choices,” The Energy Journal1, No. 1 (January, 1980): 1-9.
40.
Second National Energy Plan. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979, pp. 17, 25, 148, 159.
41.
Skolimowski, Henryk. ”Eco-philosophy versus the Scientific World View.” Ecologist Quarterly (Autumn1978).
42.
Spangler, Miller B. New, Technology and the Supply of Petroleum; The Treatment of Uncertainty in Resource Planning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956
43.
SpanglerMiller B. “Environmental and Social Issues of Site Choice for Nuclear Power Plants.” Energy Policy (March1974):19.
44.
SpanglerMiller B. “Probabilistic Methods of Assessing Risk in Cost-Benefit Analysis of Nuclear Power Plants and Alterative Energy Sources.” In KaramR. A.MorganK. Z., eds., Energy and the Environment: Cost-Benefit Analysis. New York: Pergamum Press, 1976
45.
SpanglerMiller B. “The Use of Scenarios in a Technology Assessment of Offshore Oil Development.” In WilmotR. D.SlingerlandA., eds., Technology Assessment and the Oceans. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1977
46.
SpanglerMiller B.United Stares Experience in Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants with Implications for Developing Countries, NUREG-070 I. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, August1980
StarrC.RudmanR.WhippleC. “Philosophical Basis for Risk Analysis.” In HollanderJ. M.SimmonsM. K., eds., Annual Energy Review, Vol. I. Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews, Inc., 1976.
49.
StarnC.WhippleC. “Risks of Risk Decisions,” Science208 (June6, 1980): 1114-1119.
50.
SternRobert J. “When Experts Disagree.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (February1975): 29-31.
51.
ThalerR.RosenS. “Value of Saving a Life: Evidence from the Labor Market.” Unpublished, 1975.
52.
WeinbergAlvin M.Economic and Environmental Implications of a U.S. Nuclear Moratorium, 1985-2010. A study by the Institute for Energy Analysis and Oak Ridge Associated Universities. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1979
53.
WildavskyAaronBudgeting: A Comparative Theory of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Link, Brown & Co., 1975.
54.
WildavskyAaron. “No Risk is the Highest Risk of All.” American Scientist (January-February1979): 32.
55.
WilsonRichard. “The Cost of Public Confidence in Nuclear? $100 Million per Life, Says Professor.” Weekly Energy Report (July1, 1974).
56.
WohlstetterAlbert. “Analysis and Design of Conflict Systems.” In QuadeEdward S. ed., Analysis for Military Decisions. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964.
