On the Use of Modern Asset Pricing for Comparing Alternative Royalty Systems for Petroleum Development Projects

Abstract

This paper is the second in a series that describes how Modern Asset Pricing (MAP) may be used for project evaluation in the upstream petroleum industry. It has two goals. First, it demonstrates how MAP can be applied to the general class of projects where the project manager does not have any future flexibility that must be analysed. Second, the usefulness of MAP in fiscal system analysis is illustrated by the evaluation of a series of oil-field development projects under a variety of fiscal regimes. In situations where different fiscal systems have the same effect on a discounted cash flow (DCF) basis, the value of afield to a developer may appear quite different when analysed using MAP. MAP takes into account the differing risk characteristics of the cash-flow streams of the developer and the government or resource owner, and provides us with an added dimension of information: comparisons of how different fiscal systems distribute risk among the parties involved in the project.

Keywords

Oil Modern asset pricing (MAP)oil royalties DCF methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cox

Ross

Rubenstein

(1979). “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach,” The Journal of Financial Economics 7: 229-263.

Duffie

Huang

(1985). “Implementing Arrow-Debreu equilbria by continuous trading of a few long-lived securities,” Econometrica 53: 1337-1356.

Kemp

A.G.

Rose

Kellas

G. K.

(1988). “Petroleum Development Investment Risks and Fiscal Systems: A Comparative Study of the UK, Norway, Denmark, and the Netherlands” North Sea Study Occasional Paper No. 26, Department of Economics, University of Aberdeen (January).

Laughton

D.G.

(1997). Private Communication.

Laughton

D.G.

(1998a). “The Potential for Using Modern Asset Pricing Methods for Upstream Petroleum Project Evaluation: Introductory Remarks” The Energy Journal 19(1). This issue.

Laughton

D.G.

(1998b). “The Management of Flexibility in the Upstream Petroleum Industry,” The Energy Journal 19(1). This issue.

Laughton

D.G.

Jacoby

H.D.

(1993). “Reversion, Timing Options, and Long-Term Decision-Making,” Financial Management 22-3 (Autumn): 225-240.

Leland

H.E.

(1978). “Optimal Risk Sharing and the Leasing of Natural Resources with Applications to Oil and Gas Leasing on the OCS,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 92: 413-438.

Merton

R.C.

(1977). “On the Pricing of Contingent Claims and the Modigliani- Miller Theorem,” Journal of Financial Economics 5: 241-249.

10.

Merton

R.C.

(1982). “On the Mathematics and Economic Assumptions of Continuous-Time Models,” In Sharpe

Cootner

, eds. Financial Economics: Essays in Honor of Paul Cootner Prentice-Hall.

11.

Press

W.H.

Flannery

B.P.

Teukolsky

S.A.

Vetterling

W.T.

(1988). Numerical Recipes in C Cambridge.

12.

Salahor

(1998). “Implications of Output Price Risk and Operating Leverage for the Evaluation of Petroleum Development Projects,” The Energy Journal 19(1). This issue.