Differences in locational spot prices in an electric network provide the natural measure of the price for transmission. The ubiquitous problem of loop flow requires different economic intuition for interpreting the implications of spot pricing. The DC-Load model is the usual approximation for estimating spot prices, although it ignores reactive power effects. This approximation is best when thermal constraints create congestion in the network. In the presence of voltage constraints, the DC-Load model is insufficient, and the full AC-Model is required to determine both real and reactive power spot prices.
AndersonJ.A. (1992). “Why Opportunity Costs Are Not Legitimate,” Public Utilities Fortnightly, February 1, pp. 21-24.
2.
AndersonP.M.FouadA.A. (1977). Power System Control and Stability, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
3.
BaughmanM.L.LeeW.W. (1992). “A Monte Carlo Model for Calculating Spot Market Prices for Electricity,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 7, No. 2, May, pp. 584-590.
4.
BaughmanM.L.SiddiqiS.N. (1991). “Real-Time Pricing of Reactive Power: Theory and Case Studies, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,” Vol. 6, No. 1, February, pp. 23-29.
5.
BaughmanM.L.SiddiqiS.N.ZarnikauJ. (1992) “Advanced Pricing in Electrical Systems,” Discussion Draft, The University of Texas at Austin, October.
6.
BellD.A. (1988). Fundamentals of Electric Circuits, 4th ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
7.
BergS.V.AdamsJ.NiekumB. (1983). “Power Factors and the Efficient Pricing and Production of Reactive Power,” The Energy Journal, Special Electricity Issue, Vol. 4, pp. 93-102.
8.
BergenA.R. (1986). Power System Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Chapters 5-6.
9.
CaramanisM.C.BohnR.E.SchweppeF.C. (1982). “Optimal Spot Pricing: Practice and Theory,” IEEE PAS, Vol. PAS-101, No. 9, September, p. 3234.
10.
CunhaAntonio Jose Baptista Cardoso E. (1992). Interview with energy commissioner for the Commission of the European Communities, Public Utilities Fortnightly, January 15, pp. 11-14.
11.
CuthbertT.R.Jr. (1987). Optimization using Personal Computers: With Applications to Electrical Networks, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
12.
ElgerdO.I. (1982). Electric Energy Systems and Theory, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 2nd ed., New York.
HoganW. (1992a). “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, Vol. 4, No. 3. September, pp. 211-242.
15.
HoganW. (1992b). “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission: Technical Reference,” Energy and Environmental Policy Center, Discussion Paper E-90-17, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, September1990, revised February1992.
16.
KellyK.HendersonS.J.NaglerP.A. (1987). Some Economic Principles for Pricing Wheeled Power, NRRI-87-7, Columbus, OH, August, Chapters 2-3.
17.
RayD. (1987). “A Cost Analysis of Wheeling in the Electric Utility Industry,” PhD. Dissertation (Business), University of Wisconsin-Madison.
18.
ReasonJohn. (1989). “Reactive-Power Compensation Avoids New Line Construction,” Electrical World, October, p. 35.
U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (1991). “Notice of Public Conference and Request for Comments on Electricity Issues,” Docket No. PL91-1-000, April12.
21.
U.S. Department of Energy. (1992). Monthly Energy Review, February, p. 117.
22.
WoodA.J.WollenbergB.F. (1984). Power Generation, Control and Operation, John Wiley and Sons, New York. p. 75.
23.
ZorpetteG. (1989). “Moving Power Through the Northeast Corridor,” IEEE SPECTRUM, August, pp. 46-47.
