We propose the non-radial meta-frontier global Luenberger productivity index, which addresses the issues of technology heterogeneity, slack variable, and linear programming infeasibility, and decompose it based on the technology perspective and factor perspective. With the dataset of China’s power plants from 2005 to 2015, we identify the effects of the multi-targets, including energy-saving targets and reduction targets, in the 12th Five-Year Plan on green productivity encompassing all channels of effects. A increase in the average energy-saving target cumulatively increases green productivity by , while a increase in the average reduction target cumulatively decreases that by . In all channels, the technology leadership effect and generation efficiency exhibit sensitivity. Differential effects of the multi-targets on state-owned versus non-stateowned plants imply significant differences in observed production technology.
AngristJ.D.PischkeJ. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvem4j72.
2.
BatteseG.E.RaoD.S.P.O’DonnellC.J. (2004). “A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies.” Journal of Productivity Analysis21(1): 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PROD.0000012454.06094.29.
3.
BigernaS.D’ErricoM.C.PolinoriP. (2019). “Environmental and energy efficiency of EU electricity industry: An almost spatial two stages DEA approach.” The Energy Journal40(1): 31-56. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.40.1.sbig.
4.
BriecW.ReypochN.RatsimbanieranaH. (2011). “Productivity growth and biased technological change in hydroelectric dams.”Energy Economics33(5): 853-858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.01.011.
5.
CavesD.W.ChristensenL.R.DiewertW.E. (1982). “The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity.” Econometrica50(6): 1393-1414. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913388.
6.
CuiJ.WangC.ZhangJ.ZhengY. (2021). “The effectiveness of China’s regional carbon market pilots in reducing firm emissions.” The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118(52): e2109912118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109912118.
7.
DuL.HanleyA.ZhangN. (2016). “Environmental technical efficiency, technology gap and shadow price of coal-fuelled power plants in China: A parametric meta-frontier analysis.” Resource and Energy Economics43: 14-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.11.001.
8.
DuL.LuY.MaC. (2022). “Carbon efficiency and abatement cost of China’s coal-fired power plants.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change175: 121421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121421.
9.
DuM.LiuY.WangB.LeeM.ZhangN. (2021). “The sources of regulated productivity in Chinese power plants: An estimation of the restricted cost function combined with DEA approach." Energy Economics 100: 105318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105318.
10.
EguchiS.TakayabuH.LinC. (2021). “Sources of inefficient power generation by coal-fired thermal power plants in China: A metafrontier DEA decomposition approach.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews138: 110562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110562.
11.
FäreR.GrosskopfS. (2005). New directions: Efficiency and productivity. Springer, New York.
12.
FuS.ViardV.B.ZhangP. (2021). “Air pollution and manufacturing firm productivity: Nationwide estimates for China.” The Economic Journal131(640): 3241-3273. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueab033.
13.
FujiiH.ManagiS.KawaharaH. (2011). “The pollution release and transfer register system in the U.S. and Japan: an analysis of productivity.” Journal of Cleaner Production19(12): 1330-1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.01.010.
14.
FujiiH.ManagiS.MatousekR. (2014). “Indian bank efficiency and productivity changes with undesirable outputs: A disaggregated approach.” Journal of Banking and Finance38: 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.09.022.
15.
GreenstoneM.HannaR. (2014). “Environmental regulations, air and water pollution, and infant mortality in India.” American Economic Review104(10): 3038-3072. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3038.
16.
HeG.WangS.ZhangB. (2020). “Watering down environmental regulation in China.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics135(4): 2135-2185. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa024.
17.
HeringL.PoncetS. (2014). “Environmental policy and exports: Evidence from Chinese cities.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management68(2): 296-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.06.005.
18.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2016a). “Energy and air pollution-World energy outlook 2016 special report.”2016 edition.
19.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2016b). “CO2 emissions from fuel combustion highlights.” 2016 edition.
20.
JaraitėJ.Di MariaC. (2012). “Efficiency, productivity and environmental policy: A case study of power generation in the EU.” Energy Economics34(5): 1557-1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.11.017.
21.
KahnM.E.LiP.ZhaoD. (2015). “Water pollution progress at borders: The role of changes in China’s political promotion incentives.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy7(4): 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20130367.
22.
KevorkI.S.PangeJ.TzeremesP.TzeremesN.G. (2017). “Estimating Malmquist productivity indexes using probabilistic directional distances: An application to the European banking sector.” European Journal of Operational Research261(3): 1125-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.012.
23.
LeeC.ZhouP. (2015). “Directional shadow price estimation of CO2, SO2 and NOx in the United States coal power industry 1990-2010.”Energy Economics, 51: 493-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.010.
24.
LeeM. (2002). “The effect of sulfur regulations on the U.S. electric power industry: a generalized cost approach.” Energy Economics24: 491-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00011-7.
25.
LiM.Patiño-EcheverriD. (2017). “Estimating benefits and costs of policies proposed in the 13th FYP to improve energy efficiency and reduce air emissions of China’s electric power sector.” Energy Policy111: 222-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.011.
26.
LiM.Patiño-EcheverriD.ZhangJ. (2019). “Policies to promote energy efficiency and air emissions reductions in China’s electric power generation sector during the 11th and 12th five-year plan periods: Achievements, remaining challenges, and opportunities.” Energy Policy125: 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.008.
27.
MiZ.MengJ.GuanD.ShanY.SongM.WeiY.LiuZ.HubacekK. (2017). “Chinese CO2 emission flows have reversed since the global financial crisis.” Nature Communications8(1): 1712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01820-w.
28.
NakaishiT.TakayabuH.EguchiS. (2021). “Environmental efficiency analysis of China’s coal-fired power plants considering heterogeneity in power generation company groups.” Energy Economics102: 105511fpage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105511.
29.
NewellR.G.JaffeA.B.StavinsR.N. (1999). “The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics114(3): 941-975. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556188.
30.
OhM. (2010a). “A metafrontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index.” Energy Economics32(1): 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.07.006.
OuyangM.PengY. (2015). “The treatment-effect estimation: A case study of the 2008 economic stimulus package of China.” Journal of Econometrics188(2): 545-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.017.
33.
OuyangX.SunC. (2015). “Energy savings potential in China’s industrial sector: From the perspectives of factor price distortion and allocative inefficiency.” Energy Economics48: 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.11.020.
34.
PanY.DongF. (2022). “Dynamic evolution and driving factors of new energy development: Fresh evidence from China.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change176: 121475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121475.
QiZ.SongJ.DuanH.LiuX. (2020). “Revealing contributions to sulfur dioxide emissions in China: From the dimensions of final demand, driving effect and supply chain.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling160: 104864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104864.
37.
ShaoS.YangZ.YangL.MaS. (2019). “Can China’s energy intensity constraint policy promote total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from the industrial sector.” The Energy Journal40(4): 101-127. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.40.4.ssha.
38.
ShiX.XuZ. (2018). “Environmental regulation and firm exports: Evidence from the eleventh Five-Year Plan in China.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management89: 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.03.003.
TanakaK.ManagiS. (2013). “Measuring productivity gains from deregulation of the Japanese urban gas industry.” The Energy Journal34(4): 181-198. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.34.4.9.
41.
XuY. (2011). “The use of a goal for SO2 mitigation planning and management in China’s 11th Five-Year Plan.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management54(6): 769-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.528944.
42.
YangL.LiY.LiuH. (2021). “Did carbon trade improve green production performance? Evidence from China.” Energy Economics95: 105185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105185.
43.
YuY.ZhangN. (2021). “Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China.” Energy Economics96: 105125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105125.
44.
YuY.QianT.DuL. (2017). “Carbon productivity growth, technological innovation, and technology gap change of coalfired power plants in China.” Energy Policy109: 479-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.040.
45.
ZhangN.WangB. (2015). “A deterministic parametric metafrontier Luenberger indicator for measuring environmentally-sensitive productivity growth: A Korean fossil-fuel power case.” Energy Economics51: 88-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.06.003.
46.
ZhangN.ChoiY. (2013). “Total-factor carbon emission performance of fossil fuel power plants in China: A metafrontier non-radial Malmquist index analysis.” Energy Economics40: 549-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.08.012.
47.
ZhangN.ZhaoY.WangN. (2022). “Is China’s energy policy effective for power plants? Evidence from the 12th FiveYear Plan energy saving targets.” Energy Economics112: 106143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106143.
48.
ZhangZ.YangW.YeJ. (2021). “Why sulfur dioxide emissions decline significantly from coal-fired power plants in China? Evidence from the desulfurated electricity pricing premium program.” Energy Policy148: 111996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111996.
49.
ZhouP.AngB. W.WangH. (2012). “Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach.”European Journal of Operational Research221: 625-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.022.
50.
ZhouP.PohK.L.AngB.W. (2007). “A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance.” European Journal of Operational Research178(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.04.038
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
