Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper investigates to which extent the Dutch feed-in premium scheme for on-shore wind projects has resulted in windfall profits during 2003-2018, a period in which the design of the scheme changed several times. Using Monte Carlo simulations, for 2003, 2009 and 2018, years that represent distinct scheme designs, we estimate the distributions of the required subsidy across virtually all potential on-shore wind projects, and compare them to the granted subsidies. We find that the average windfall profits of randomly drawn projects from the pool of potential investments have decreased over time, largely as a result of differentiating in the subsidy level among projects on the basis of the wind speed at the turbine’s location. Despite these improvements, actual investments still experience substantial windfall profits, implying that investors successfully seek out projects that yield the highest windfall profits. Overall, the results imply that accounting for heterogeneity by differentiating in the subsidy level contributes to mitigating windfall profits.

Keywords

Renewable electricity subsidies Windfall profits Support scheme design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bolkesjø

T.F.

Eltvig

P.T.

Nygaard

(2014). “An econometric analysis of support scheme effects on renewable energy investments in Europe.” Energy Procedia 58: 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.401.

Borenstein

(2012). “The private and public economics of renewable electricity generation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(1): 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.1.67.

Borenstein

(2017). “Private net benefits of residential solar PV: The role of electricity tariffs, tax incentives, and rebates.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4(S1): 85–S122. https://doi.org/10.1086/691978.

Coase

R.H.

(1960). “The problem of social cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560.

Dijkgraaf

Van Dorp

T.P.

Maasland

(2018). “On the effectiveness of feed-in tariffs in the development of solar photovoltaics.” The Energy Journal 39(1): 81–99. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.1.edij.

Echavarria

Hahn

Van Bussel

Tomiyama

(2008). “Reliability of wind turbine technology through time.” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 130(3). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2936235.

Egli

(2020). “Renewable energy investment risk: An investigation of changes over time and the underlying drivers.” Energy Policy 140: 111428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111428.

Egli

Steffen

Schmidt

T.S.

(2018). “A dynamic analysis of financing conditions for renewable energy technologies.” Nature Energy 3(12): 1084–1092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0277-y.

Eurostat (2020a). “Electricity prices components for household consumers—annual data (from 2007 onwards) [data base]” .

10.

Eurostat (2020b). “Electricity prices components for non-household consumers—annual data (from 2007 onwards) [data base].”

11.

Eurostat (2020c). “Production of electricity and derived heat by type of fuel [data base].”

12.

Fraunhofer (2018). “Levelized cost of electricity—Renewable energy technologies.” Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy System ISE.

13.

Gerlagh

Van der Zwaan

(2006). “Options and instruments for a deep cut in CO2 emissions: Carbon dioxide capture or renewables, taxes or subsidies?” The Energy Journal 27(3). https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol27-No3-3.

14.

Gianfreda

Bunn

(2018). “A stochastic latent moment model for electricity price formation.” Operations Research 66(5): 1189–1203. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2018.1733.

15.

Green

Yatchew

(2012). “Support schemes for renewable energy: An economic analysis.” Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 1(2): 83–98. https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.1.2.6.

16.

Haas

Resch

Panzer

Busch

Ragwitz

Held

(2011). “Efficiency and effectiveness of promotion systems for electricity generation from renewable energy sources—Lessons from EU countries.” Energy 36(4): 2186–2193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.028.

17.

Hirth

(2013). “The market value of variable renewables: The effect of solar wind power variability on their relative price.” Energy Economics 38: 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.004.

18.

IEA (2021). “Policies database.” https://www.iea.org/policies/.

19.

Jaraite

Kažukauskas

(2013). “The profitability of electricity generating firms and policies promoting renewable energy.” Energy Economics 40: 858–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.10.001.

20.

Joumard

Kongsrud

P.M.

Nam

Y.-S.

Price

(2004). “Enhancing the effectiveness of public spending: Experience in OECD countries.” OECD report. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-v2003-art10-en.

21.

Lemming

(2003). “Financial risks for green electricity investors and producers in a tradable green certificate market.” Energy Policy 31(1): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00114-3.

22.

Lyon

T.P.

Yin

(2010). “Why do states adopt renewable portfolio standards? An empirical investigation.” The Energy Journal 31(3). https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-No3-7.

23.

Manwell

J.F.

McGowan

J.G.

Rogers

A.L.

(2010). Wind energy explained: Theory, design and application. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119994367.

24.

May

(2017). “The impact of wind power support schemes on technology choices.” Energy Economics 65: 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.017.

25.

Meyer

N.I.

(2003). “European schemes for promoting renewables in liberalised markets.” Energy Policy 31(7): 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00151-9.

26.

Mitchell

Bauknecht

Connor

P. M.

(2006). “Effectiveness through risk reduction: A comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany.” Energy Policy 34(3): 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.004.

27.

Nicolini

Tavoni

(2017). “Are renewable energy subsidies effective? Evidence from Europe.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 74: 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.032.

28.

Pigou

A.C.

(1920). The economics of welfare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. REN21 (2020). “Renewables 2019: Global status report.”

29.

Schmalensee

(2012). “Evaluating policies to increase electricity generation from renewable energy.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 6(1): 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rer020.

30.

Schmidt

Lehecka

Gass

Schmid

(2013). “Where the wind blows: Assessing the effect of fixed and premium based feed-in tariffs on the spatial diversification of wind turbines.” Energy Economics 40: 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.07.004.

31.

Stavins

R.N.

(2011). “The problem of the commons: still unsettled after 100 years.” American Economic Review 101(1): 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.1.81.

32.

Taylor

(2020). “Energy subsidies: Evolution in the global energy transformation to 2050.” Technical report International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA).

33.

Verbruggen

(2008). “Windfalls and other profits.” Energy Policy 36(9): 3249–3251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-pol.2008.05.032.

34.

Wiser

Bolinger

Hoen

Millstein

Rand

Barbose

Darghouth

Gorman

Jeong

Mills

Paulos

(2020). “Wind Energy Technology Data Update: 2020 Edition.” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB

Design of Renewable Support Schemes and Windfall Profits: A Monte Carlo Analysis for the Netherlands

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material