We implement the hybrid (energy-economy) recursive-dynamic multisector IMA-CLIM model with important adaptations to Saudi macroeconomics. We design two scenarios reflecting both the Saudi Vision 2030 economic development program and Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) to greenhouse gas mitigation: Continuity of previous plans to expand energy-intensive activities under maintained energy-pricing policies, versus Transformation by economic diversification away from hydrocarbon-related activities and fiscal and energy-pricing reforms. We show that, compared to Continuity, Transformation improves activity, employment and public budget outlooks, while considerably abating the energy intensity of GDP and total CO2 emissions. Our results thus point at the relevance of economic diversification as both a hedging strategy against international climate change mitigation depressing oil markets and a national climate mitigation strategy for Saudi Arabia. However, the successful advancement of the reforms necessary for diversification remains conditional to setting a suitable institutional framework for a competitive economy.
Al YousifM.Al BakrA. (2017). “Tourism development effect on saudi economic diversification.” SAMA Working Paper, March 2017. http://www.sama.gov.sa/en-US/EconomicResearch/WorkingPapers/Tourism%20Development%20Effect%20Qn%20Saudi%20Economic%20Diversification.pdf.
2.
AlbassamB.A. (2015). “Economic diversification in Saudi Arabia: Myth or reality?” Resources Policy44: 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.02.005.
3.
Al-HawwasA. (2010). “Policy experiments for the Saudi’s economy using a Computable General Equilibrium Model (CGE), oil demand and tariff liberalization effects on the Saudi economy.” PhD thesis, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom. https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/files/1692405/Al-Hawwas_phd_2010.pdf.
4.
AlKathiriN.AtallaT.N.MurphyF.PierruA. (2020). “Optimal policies for managing oil revenue stabilization funds: An illustration using Saudi Arabia.” Resources Policy67: 101686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101686.
5.
Al-ThumairiI.A. (2012). “Fixed or flexible exchange rate for Saudi Arabia: optimal solution of CGE model.” International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences1(2): 67-87. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?-doi=10.1.1.1004.12&rep=rep1&type=pdf. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbas.v1i2.29.
6.
BauerN.MouratiadouI.LudererG.BaumstarkL.BrechaR.J.EdenhoferO.KrieglerE. (2013). “Global Fossil Energy Markets and Climate Change Mitigation: An Analysis with REMIND.” Climatic Change136(1): 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0901-6.
7.
BlanchflowerD.G.OswaldA.J. (2005). “The wage curve reloaded.” National Bureau of Economic Research no. w11338. https://www.nber.org/papers/w11338.pdf. https://doi.org/10.3386/w11338.
8.
BlazquezJ.HuntL.C.ManzanoB. (2017). “Oil Subsidies and Renewable Energy in Saudi Arabia: A General Equilibrium Approach.” The Energy Journal38(SI1): 29-45. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.SI1.jbla.
9.
CallenM.T.CherifR.HasanovF.HegazyM.A.KhandelwalP. (2014). Economic diversification in the GCC: Past, present, and future. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/∼/media/Websites/IMF/Imported/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/_sdn1412pdf.ashx. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498303231.006.
10.
CDSI (2014). National accounts 1435/1436 A.H. (2014). Central Department of Statistics and Information. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
11.
CombetE.GhersiF.LefevreJ.Le TreutG. (2014). “Construction of hybrid Input-Output tables for E3 CGE model calibration and consequences on energy policy analysis.” GTAP resource #4524, Global Trade Analysis Program, Purdue University, 27 p. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/6988.pdf.
12.
CrassousR.HourcadeJ.C.SassiO. (2006). “Endogenous Structural Change and Climate Targets. Modeling experiments with IMACLIM-R.” The Energy Journal Special Issue, Endogenous Technological Change and the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization: 259-276. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI1-13.
13.
De LauretisS.GhersiF.CaylaJ.M. (2017). “Energy consumption and activity patterns: an analysis extended to total time and energy use for French households.” Applied Energy206: 634-648. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.apenergy.2017.08.180.
14.
De SantisR.A. (2003). “Crude oil price fluctuations and Saudi Arabia’s behavior.” Energy Economics25(2): 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00106-8.
15.
DevauxP. (2013) “Economic diversification in the GCC: dynamic drive needs to be confirmed.” BNP Paribas economic research, July-August 2013. http://economic-research.bnpparibas.com/Views/DisplayPublication.aspx?type=document&Id-Pdf=22570.
16.
EdenhoferO.Pichs-MadrugaR.SokonaY.MinxJ.C.FarahaniE.SusanneK., (2014). “Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change.” https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415416.
17.
El MallakhR. (2015). Saudi Arabia: Rush to Development (RLE Economy of Middle East): Profile of an energy economy and investment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315744414.
18.
GhersiF. (2015). “Hybrid Bottom-up/Top-down Energy and Economy Outlooks: A Review of IMACLIM-S Experiments.” Frontiers in Environmental Science3(74): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00074.
19.
GhersiF.HourcadeJ.C. (2006). “Macroeconomic consistency issues in E3 modeling: the continued fable of the elephant and the rabbit.” The Energy Journal (SI2): 39-61. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI2-3.
20.
GonandF.HasanovF.HuntL. (2019) “Estimating the impact of energy price reform on Saudi Arabian intergenerational welfare using the MEGIR-SA model.” The Energy Journal40(3): 101-123. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.40.3.fgon.
21.
GuptaD.GhersiF.VishwanathanS.S.GargA. (2019). “Achieving sustainable development in India along low carbon pathways: Macroeconomic assessment.” World Development123: 104623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.world-dev.2019.104623.
22.
GuptaD.GhersiF.VishwanathanS.S.GargA. (2020). “Macroeconomic assessment of India’s development and mitigation pathways.” Climate Policy20(7): 779-799. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1648235
23.
HourcadeJ.C.JaccardM.BatailleC.GhersiF. (2006). “Hybrid Modeling: New Answers to Old Challenges.” The Energy Journal (SI2): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VolSI2006-NoSI2-1.
24.
CombetE.GhersiF.HourcadeJ.C.TheryD. (2010). “Carbon tax and equity: The importance of policy design.” Dias SoaresC.MilneJ.AshiaborH.DeketelaereK.KreiserL. (Eds.), Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation, Vol. VIII (2010), pp. 277-295
25.
HSBC (2018). “Now, next and how for business. Saudi Arabia report.” https://www.business.hsbc.com/-/media/cmb/tfr/sau-di-arabia-report-2018.pdf.
26.
HvidtM. (2013) “Economic diversification in GCC countries: Past record and future trends.” Research Paper No. 27: Kuwait Programme on Development, Governance and Globalisation in the Gulf States, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/55252/.
27.
IEA (2017). World Energy Outlook 2017. International Energy Agency, Paris, France.IEA (2019). CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion. International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
28.
IMF (2016a). Economic Diversification in Oil-Exporting Arab Countries. In Annual Meeting of Arab Ministers of Finance, April 2016, Manama, Bahrain. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2016/042916.pdf.
29.
IMF (2016b). World Economic Outlook Database, April 2016. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/01/weodata/index.aspx.
30.
Jadwa (2017). “Petrochemicals and the Vision 2030.” February 2017. http://www.jadwa.com/en/download/petrochemi-cals-and-the-vision-2030/research-13-1-1-1-1-1-1.
31.
JohanssonD.J.AzarC.LindgrenK.PerssonT.A. (2009). “OPEC strategies and oil rent in a climate conscious world.” The Energy Journal30(3): 23-50. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol30-No3-2.
32.
Le TreutG. (2017). Methodological proposals for hybrid modelling: consequences for climate policy analysis in an open economy (France). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01707559/document.
33.
LefevreJ.WillsW.HourcadeJ.C. (2018). “Combining low-carbon economic development and oil exploration in Brazil? An energy-economy assessment.” Climate policy18.10: 1286-1295. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1431198.
34.
MGI (2015). “Saudi Arabia beyond oil: the investment and productivity transformation.” McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey & Company, December 2015. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/moving-sau-di-arabias-economy-beyond-oil.
35.
MoyaJ.A.BoulamantiA. (2016). “Production costs from energy-intensive industries in the EU and third countries.” EUR27729EN; doi:10.2790/056120. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/38632391.pdf.
36.
PershingJ., (2000). “Fossil fuel implications of climate change mitigation responses.” BersteinL.J.PanJ. (Eds.), Sectoral Economic Costs and Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, IPCC, Bilthoven, the Netherlands. https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/supporting-material/sectoral-economic-costs-2000.pdf.
37.
PerssonT. A.AzarC.JohanssonD.LindgrenK. (2007). “Major oil exporters may profit rather than lose, in a carbon-constrained world.” Energy Policy35(12): 6346-6353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.06.027.
38.
RutherfordT.F. (1999). “Applied general equilibrium modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS subsystem: An overview of the modeling framework and syntax.” Computational economics14(1-2): 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008655831209.
39.
SassiO.CrassousR.HourcadeJ.C.GitzV.WaismanH.GuivarchC. (2010). “Imaclim-R: a modelling framework to simulate sustainable development pathways.” International Journal of Global Environmental Issues10: 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2010.030566.
40.
Saudi Arabia (2005). “First National Communication of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the UNFCCC.” https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/saunc1.pdf.
41.
Saudi Arabia (2011). “Second National Communication of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the UNFCCC.” https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/saunc2.pdf.
42.
Saudi Arabia (2015). “The Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia under the UN-FCCC.” https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Saudi%20Arabia%20First/KSA-INDCs%20En-glish.pdf.
43.
Saudi Arabia (2016a). “Third National Communication of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the UNFCCC.” https://unfccc.int/files/national_reports/non-annex_i_natcom/application/pdf/saudi_arabia_nc3_22_dec_2016.pdf.
44.
Saudi Arabia (2016b). “Saudi Vision 2030.” https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/media/rc0b5oy1/saudi_vision203.pdf.
45.
SAMA (2018). “Annual Statistics 2018.” Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority. Retrieved from http://www.sama.gov.sa/en-US/EconomicReports/Pages/YearlyStatistics.aspx.
46.
SchersJ.GhersiF.LecocqF.GraziF. (2015). “Green Growth and its Implications for Public Policy-The Case of South Africa.” https://www.afd.fr/en/green-growth-and-its-implications-public-policy.
47.
ShehabiM. (2020). “Diversification effects of energy subsidy reform in oil exporters: Illustrations from Kuwait.” Energy Policy, 138, 110966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110966.
48.
SoummaneS.GhersiF. (2019). “Hybrid Input-Output tables for Saudi Arabia at the year 2013.” Mendeley Data, V2. https://doi.org/10.17632/wr9mprpj5k.2.
49.
SoummaneS.GhersiF. (2020). “The IMACLIM-SAU model version 1.0.” CIRED Working Paper 2020-77, CIRED, Paris. http://www.centre-cired.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/cired_wp_2020_77_soummane_ghersi.pdf.
50.
SoummaneS.GhersiF.LefevreJ. (2019). “Macroeconomic pathways of the Saudi economy: The challenge of global mitigation action versus the opportunity of national energy reforms.” Energy Policy130: 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.062.
51.
TaylorL.LysyF. J. (1979). “Vanishing income redistributions—Keynesian Clues about model surprises in the short run.” Journal of Development Economics6: 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(79)90033-6.
52.
Tax Foundation (2018). Corporate Tax Rates Around the World, 2018. Retrieved from: https://taxfoundation.org/corporate-tax-rates-around-world-2018/.
53.
Van de GraafT.VerbruggenA. (2015). “The oil endgame: Strategies of oil exporters in a carbon-constrained world.” Environmental Science & Policy54: 456-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.004.
54.
WaismanH.RozenbergJ.HourcadeJ.C. (2013). “Monetary compensations in climate policy through the lens of a general equilibrium assessment: The case of oil-exporting countries.” Energy Policy63: 951-961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.055.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
