Liquidity is decisive for a well-functioning market. As most of the literature on the subject is based on financial markets, the extrapolation of its insights to the power market is fragile. This paper shows the specificities of liquidity of the German power market. Using the bid-ask spread as a proxy, thanks to the detailed order book for the hourly contracts, I first describe the evolution of the liquidity over the trading session. The bid-ask spread has a “L-shaped” pattern over it. Second,I identify the four main drivers of the bid-ask spread: the volatility, the adjustments’ need (forecast errors), the activity and the concentration of the market. I find that an increase of the volatility or the market concentration increases the bid-ask spread while an increase of the adjustments’ need or the market activity decreases it.
AmanatidisG. (2019). “European Policies on Climate and Energy towards 2020, 2030 and 2050.”
2.
AngelJ.J.HarrisL.E.SpattC.S. (2013). “Equity Trading in the 21st Century: An Update, June 21.” New York: Knight Capital Group.
3.
AngelidisT.BenosA. (2009). “The components of the bid-ask spread: The case of the Athens stock exchange.” European Financial Management15(1): 112-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00416.x.
4.
Chaves-ÁvilaJ.P.HakvoortR.A.RamosA. (2013). “Short-term strategies for Dutch wind power producers to reduce imbalance costs.” Energy Policy52: 573-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.011.
5.
ChenX.LintonO.SchneebergerS.YiY. (2019). “Semiparametric estimation of the bid-ask spread in extended roll models.” Journal of Econometrics208(1): 160-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.09.010.
6.
CopelandT.E.GalaiD. (1983). “Information effects on the bid-ask spread.” The Journal of Finance38(5): 1457-1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb03834.x.
7.
DemsetzH. (1968). “The cost of transacting.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics82(1): 33-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882244.
8.
DupuisD.J.GauthierG.GodinF., (2016). “Short-term hedging for an electricity retailer.” The Energy Journal37(2): 31-59. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.2.ddup.
9.
GemanH. (2005). Commodities and commodity derivatives: pricing and modeling agricultural, metals and energy. West Sussex, England: Wiley Finance.
10.
GlostenL.R. (1987). “Components of the bid-ask spread and the statistical properties of transaction prices.” The Journal of Finance42(5): 1293-1307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04367.x.
11.
GlostenL.R.HarrisL.E. (1988). “Estimating the components of the bid/ask spread.” Journal of Financial Economics21(1): 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90034-7.
12.
GlostenL.R.MilgromP.R. (1985). “Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders.” Journal of Financial Economics14(1): 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90044-3.
13.
HagemannS. (2015). “Price determinants in the german intraday market for electricity: an empirical analysis.” Journal of Energy Markets. https://doi.org/10.21314/JEM.2015.128.
14.
HagemannS.WeberC. (2013). “An empirical analysis of liquidity and its determinants in the German intraday market for electricity.” https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2349565.
15.
HasbrouckJ. (2004). “Liquidity in the futures pits: Inferring market dynamics from incomplete data.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis39(2): 305-326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000003082.
16.
HasbrouckJ.SofianosG. (1993). “The trades of market makers: An empirical analysis of NYSE specialists.” The Journal of Finance48(5): 1565-1593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05121.x.
17.
HuangR.D.StollH.R. (1996). “Dealer versus auction markets: A paired comparison of execution costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE.” Journal of Financial Economics41(3): 313-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00867-E.
18.
HuangR.D.StollH.R. (1997). “The components of the bid-ask spread: A general approach.” The Review of Financial Studies10(4): 995-1034. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10A995.
19.
HuangY.C. (2004). “The components of bid-ask spread and their determinants: TAIFEX versus SGX-DT.” The Journal of Futures Markets24(9): 835. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.20113.
20.
IvanovS.I. (2016). “Analysis of ETF bid-ask spread components.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance61: 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.02.004.
21.
KaranfilF.LiY. (2017). “The Role of Continuous Intraday Electricity Markets: The Integration of Large-Share Wind Power Generation in Denmark.” The Energy Journal38(2). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.2.fkar.
22.
KieselR.ParaschivF. (2017). “Econometric analysis of 15-minute intraday electricity prices.” Energy Economics64: 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.002.
23.
KimS.-H.OgdenJ.P. (1996). “Determinants of the components of bid-ask spreads on stocks.” European Financial Management2(1): 127-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.1996.tb00032.x.
24.
LhabitantF.-S.GregoriouG.N. (2008). Stock market liquidity: implications for market microstructure and asset pricing. Volume 420, John Wiley & Sons.
25.
MadhavanA.RichardsonM.RoomansM. (1997). “Why do security prices change? A transaction-level analysis of NYSE stocks.” The Review of Financial Studies10(4): 1035-1064. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10A1035.
26.
MadhavanA.SofianosG. (1998). “An empirical analysis of NYSE specialist trading.” Journal of Financial Economics48(2): 189-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00008-7.
27.
ManasterS.MannS.C. (1996). “Life in the pits: Competitive market making and inventory control.” The Review of Financial Studies9(3): 953-975. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/9.3.953.
28.
McInishT.H.WoodR.A. (1992). “An analysis of intraday patterns in bid/ask spreads for NYSE stocks.” The Journal of Finance47(2): 753-764. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04408.x.
29.
MizrachB.OtsuboY. (2014). “The market microstructure of the European climate exchange.” Journal of Banking & Finance39: 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.11.001.
30.
NeuhoffK.RitterN.Salah-Abou-El-EnienA.VassilopoulosP. (2016). “Intraday markets for power: Discretizing the continuous trading?” https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2723902.
31.
PapeC.HagemannS.WeberC. (2016). “Are fundamentals enough? Explaining price variations in the German day-ahead and intraday power market.” Energy Economics54: 376-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.12.013.
32.
RollR. (1984). “A simple implicit measure of the effective bid-ask spread in an efficient market.” The Journal of Finance39(4): 1127-1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03897.x.
33.
RyuD. (2011). “Intraday price formation and bid-ask spread components: A new approach using a cross-market model.” Journal of Futures Markets31(12): 1142-1169. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.20533.
34.
ScharffR.AmelinM. (2016). “Trading behaviour on the continuous intraday market Elbas.” Energy Policy88: 544-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.045.
35.
SchultzP. (2000). “Regulatory and legal pressures and the costs of Nasdaq trading.” The Review of Financial Studies13(4): 917-957. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/13A917.
36.
SchwartzR.A. (1988). Equity markets: Structure, trading, and performance. Harpercollins College Div.
37.
StollH.R. (1978). “The supply of dealer services in securities markets.” The Journal of Finance33(4): 1133-1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb02053.x.
38.
StollH.R. (1989). “Inferring the components of the bid-ask spread: Theory and empirical tests.” The Journal of Finance44(1): 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb02407.x.
39.
WeberC. (2010). “Adequate intraday market design to enable the integration of wind energy into the European power systems.” Energy Policy38(7): 3155-3163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.040.
40.
ZielF. (2017). “Modeling the impact of wind and solar power forecasting errors on intraday electricity prices.” In “European Energy Market (EEM), 2017 14th International Conference on the,” IEEE 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2017.7981900.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
