Imperfect information on future energy costs can lower the demand for more energy efficient technologies, with clear implications for energy supply, emissions and climate change. These hypotheses are explored using a randomised discrete choice experiment for property rental decisions. Results show that when energy consumption is expressed in physical units (as per the current EU labels) the will-ingness-to-pay for energy efficiency improvements is small and marginally significant. While bimonthly energy cost information displayed in monetary terms has no effect on the valuation of energy efficiency, annual monetary energy cost information led to a significant increase. This is the first paper to compare short and long-term point of sale energy cost information for household property decisions. There are clear implications for labelling policy for properties—framing energy consumption according to long-term monetary cost increases the demand for energy efficiency.
AlberiniAnnaBanfiS.RamseierC. (2013). “Energy Efficiency Investments in the Home: Swiss Homeowners and Expectations about Future Energy Prices.” The Energy Journal34(1): 49–86. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.34.L3.
2.
AllcottHunt (2011). “Consumers’ Perceptions and Misperceptions of Energy Costs.” American Economic Review101(3): 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.10L3.98.
3.
AllcottHuntGreenstoneMichael (2012). “Is There an Energy Efficiency Gap?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives26(1): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.L3.
4.
AndorMarkGersterAndreasSommerStephan (2017). “Consumer inattention, heuristic thinking and the role of energy labels.” Ruhr Economic Papers No. 671. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2795579.
5.
AydinErdalBrounenDirkKokNils (2020). “The Capitalization of Energy Efficiency: Evidence from the Housing Market.” Journal of Urban Economics: 103243. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjue.2020.103243.
6.
BanfiSilviaFarsiMehdiFilippiniMassimoJakobMartin (2008). “Willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in residential buildings.” Energy Economics30(2): 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.06.001.
7.
BergmannArielHanleyNickWrightRobert (2006). “Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments.” Energy Policy34 (9):1004–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.enpol.2004.08.035.
8.
BlaschJuliaFilippiniMassimoKumarNilkanth (2017). “Boundedly rational consumers, energy and investment literacy, and the display of information on household appliances.” Resource and Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.06.001.
9.
BrounenDirkKokNils (2011). “On the economics of energy labels in the housing market.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management62(2): 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjeem.2010.11.006.
10.
BrounenDirkKokNilsQuigleyJohn M. (2013). “Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behavior of residential households.” Energy Economics38: 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.008.
11.
CarlssonFredrik (2011). “Non-Market Valuation: Stated Preference Methods“ In The Economics of Food Consumption and Policy edited by LuskJayson L.RoosenJuttaShogrenJason F.Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199569441.013.0008.
12.
CarrollJamesAravenaClaudiaDennyEleanor (2016). “Low energy efficiency in rental properties: Asymmetric information or low willingness-to-pay?” Energy Policy96: 617–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.019.
13.
Central Statistics Office (2019). “Census of Population 2016—Profile 1 Housing in Ireland.” accessed 09/03/2020. https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-cp1hii/cp1hii/tr/.
14.
CummingsRonald G.TaylorLaura O. (1999). “Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method.” American Economic Review89(3): 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.649.
15.
DavisLucas W. (2012). “Evaluating the Slow Adoption of Energy Efficient Investments: Are Renters Less Likely to Have Energy Efficient Appliances?” In The Design and Implementation of US Climate Policy edited by FullertonD.WolframC.301–317. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
16.
de WildePieter (2014). “The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for inves-tigation.” Automation in Construction41: 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.02.009.
17.
DECC (2014). “Evaluation of the DECC/John Lewis energy labelling trial.” accessed 8th November 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/350282/John_Lewis_trial_report_010914FINAL.pdf.
18.
DeutschMatthias (2010). “Life Cycle Cost Disclosure, Consumer Behavior, and Business Implications.” Journal of Industrial Ecology14(1): 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00201.x.
19.
FerriniSilviaScarpaRiccardo (2007). “Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management53(3): 342–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.007.
20.
FrondelM.GersterA.VanceC. (2020). “The Power of Mandatory Quality Disclosure: Evidence from the German Housing Market.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists7(1): 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1086/705786.
21.
FuerstFranzMcAllisterPatrickNandaAnupamWyattPeter (2015). “Does energy efficiency matter to home-buy-ers? An investigation of EPC ratings and transaction prices in England.” Energy Economics48: 145–156. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.12.012.
22.
FuerstFranzWarren-MyersGeorgia (2018). “Does voluntary disclosure create a green lemon problem? Energy-efficiency ratings and house prices.” Energy Economics74: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.041.
23.
GourvilleJohn T. (1998). “Pennies-a-Day: The Effect of Temporal Reframing on Transaction Evaluation.” Journal of Consumer Research24(4): 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1086/209517.
24.
GreeneWilliam H.HensherDavid A. (2003). “A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological37(8): 681–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00046-2.
25.
HeinzleStefanie LenaWustenhagenRolf (2012). “Dynamic Adjustment of Eco-labeling Schemes and Consumer Choice—the Revision of the EU Energy Label as a Missed Opportunity?” Business Strategy and the Environment21(1): 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.722.
26.
HeinzleStefanie Lena (2012). “Disclosure of Energy Operating Cost Information: A Silver Bullet for Overcoming the Ener-gy-Efficiency Gap?” Journal of Consumer Policy35(1): 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-012-9189-6.
27.
HensherDavid A.RoseJohn M.GreeneWilliam H. (2005). Applied Choice Analysis: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610356
28.
HidrueMichael K.ParsonsGeorge R.KemptonWillettGardnerMeryl P. (2011). “Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes.” Resource and Energy Economics33(3): 686–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rese-neeco.2011.02.002.
29.
HoenAncoKoetseMark J. (2014). “A choice experiment on alternative fuel vehicle preferences of private car owners in the Netherlands.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 61: 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.008.
30.
HoudeSebastien (2018). “How consumers respond to product certification and the value of energy information.” The RAND Journal of Economics49(2): 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12231.
31.
HylandMarieLyonsRonan C.LyonsSean (2013). “The value of domestic building energy efficiency—evidence from Ireland.” Energy Economics40(0): 943–952. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.eneco.2013.07.020.
32.
JaffeAdam B.StavinsRobert N. (1994a). “The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean?” Energy Policy22(10): 804–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(94)90138-4.
33.
JaffeAdam B.StavinsRobert N. (1994b). “The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology.” Resource and Energy Economics16(2): 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0928-7655(94)90001-9.
34.
JensenOle MichaelHansenAnders RhigerKraghJesper (2016). “Market response to the public display of energy performance rating at property sales.” Energy Policy93: 229–235. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.029.
35.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica47(2): 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.
36.
KallbekkenSteffenSælenHåkonHermansenErlendA T. (2013). “Bridging the Energy Efficiency Gap: A Field Experiment on Lifetime Energy Costs and Household Appliances.” Journal of Consumer Policy36(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-012-9211-z.
37.
LancasterKelvin J. (1966). “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy74(2): 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131.
38.
LancsarE.LouviereJ. (2008). “Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide.” Pharmacoeconomics26(8): 661–77. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004.
39.
LevinsonArik (2016). “How Much Energy Do Building Energy Codes Save? Evidence from California Houses.” American Economic Review106(10): 2867–94. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150102.
40.
ListJohn A. (2003). “Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics118(1): 41–71. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535144.
41.
LyonsRonan C. (2016). “The Daft.ie Rental Report: An analysis of recent trends in the Irish rental market, 2016 Q1.” accessed 09/03/2020. https://www.daft.ie/report/q1-2016-daft-rental-report.pdf.
42.
McFaddenDanielTrainKenneth (2000). “Mixed MNL models for discrete response.” Journal of Applied Econometrics15(5): 447–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::AID-JAE570>3.0.CO;2-1.
43.
MelvinJesse (2018). “The split incentives energy efficiency problem: Evidence of underinvestment by landlords.” Energy Policy115: 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.069.
44.
MinJihoonAzevedoInês L.MichalekJeremyde BruinWändi Bruin (2014). “Labeling energy cost on light bulbs lowers implicit discount rates.” Ecological Economics97: 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016zj.ecolecon.2013.10.015.
45.
MyersErica (2019). “Are Home Buyers Inattentive? Evidence from Capitalization of Energy Costs.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy11(2): 165–88. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20170481.
46.
NewellRichard G.SiikamakiJuha (2014). “Nudging Energy Efficiency Behavior: The Role of Information Labels.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists1(4): 555–598. https://doi.org/10.1086/679281.
47.
PapineauM. (2017). “Energy Efficiency Premiums in Unlabeled Office Buildings.” The Energy Journal38(4): 195–212. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.4.mpap.
48.
ReveltDavidTrainKenneth (1998). “Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households’ Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level.” Review of Economics and Statistics80(4): 647–657. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557735.
49.
SalleeJames M. (2014). “Rational inattention and energy efficiency.” The Journal of Law and Economics57(3): 781–820. https://doi.org/10.1086/676964.
50.
SammerKatharinaWustenhagenRolf (2006). “The influence of eco-labelling on consumer behaviour—results of a discrete choice analysis for washing machines.” Business Strategy and the Environment15(3): 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.522.
51.
ScarpaRiccardoWillisKen (2010). “Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households’ for micro-generation technologies.” Energy Economics32(1): 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.004
52.
ShenJunyiSaijoTatsuyoshi (2009). “Does an energy efficiency label alter consumers’ purchasing decisions? A latent class approach based on a stated choice experiment in Shanghai.” Journal of Environmental Management90(11): 3561–3573. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvman.2009.06.010.
53.
SouzaM.N.M. (2018). “Why are rented dwellings less energy-efficient? Evidence from a representative sample of the U.S. housing stock.” Energy Policy118: 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.013.
54.
SovacoolBenjamin K.BlythPascale L. (2015). “Energy and environmental attitudes in the green state of Denmark: Implications for energy democracy, low carbon transitions, and energy literacy.” Environmental Science & Policy54: 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.011.
55.
StanleySarahLyonsRonan C.LyonsSean (2016). “The price effect of building energy ratings in the Dublin residential market.” Energy Efficiency9(4): 875–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9396-5.
56.
StreetDeborah J.BurgessLeonieLouviereJordan J. (2005). “Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments.” International Journal of Research in Marketing22(4): 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.09.003.
57.
Sunikka-BlankMinnaGalvinRay (2012). “Introducing the prebound effect: the gap between performance and actual energy consumption.” Building Research & Information40(3): 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.690952.
58.
TrainK. (2003). Discrete Choice Methods With Simulation: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753930.
59.
TurrentineThomas S.KuraniKenneth S. (2007). “Car buyers and fuel economy?” Energy Policy35(2): 1213–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.enpol.2006.03.005.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
