This study moves beyond the consensus of counting electrified households as a measure of progress in gender energy parity. Using the India Human Development Survey, we examine the effect of reliability of electrification on empowerment of women in terms of economic autonomy, agency, mobility and decision-making abilities, underscoring the labor market and respite effects of service reliability.
We develop a comprehensive set of empowerment indices using principal component analysis and assess the causal effects of power outages on the indices with instrumental variable regressions while controlling for individual, household, district and caste characteristics. Results show that reliability of electricity lias significant positive effects on all empowerment indices and improves women’s labor market outcomes, however, the effects differ at the margin of deficiency, location, living standards and education. The study recommends policy focus on electrification from a gendered lens for cost-effective solutions.
AbrahamV. (2013). “Missing labour or consistent ‘de-feminisation’”? Economic and Political Weekly.
3.
AklinM.ChengC.-y.UrpelainenJ.GanesanK.JainA. (2016). Factors affecting household satisfaction with electricity supply in rural India. Nature Energy1(11): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.170.
4.
AllcottH.Collard-WexlerA.O’ConnellS.D. (2016). “How do electricity shortages affect industry? evidence from India.” American Economic Review106(3): 587–624. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20140389.
5.
AmuthaW.M.RajiniV. (2016). “Cost benefit and technical analysis of rural electrification alternatives in southern India using homer.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews62: 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.042.
6.
BaiJ.JayachandranS.MaleskyE.J.OlkenB.A. (2019). “Firm growth and corruption: empirical evidence from Vietnam.” The Economic Journal129(618): 651–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12560.
7.
BansalM.SainiR.KhatodD. (2013). “Development of cooking sector in rural areas in India—a review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews17: 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.014.
8.
BurgessR.GreenstoneM.RyanN.SudarshanA. (2020). “The consequences of treating electricity as a right.” Journal of Economic Perspectives34(1): 145–69. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.L145.
9.
ChakravortyU.PelliM.MarchandB.U. (2014). “Does the quality of electricity matter? evidence from rural India.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization107: 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.04.011.
10.
DangD.A.LaH.A. (2019). “Does electricity reliability matter? evidence from rural Viet Nam.” Energy Policy131: 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.036.
11.
DesaiS.VannemanR. (2018). National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi. India Human Development Survey (IHDS): 2012. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, University of Michigan.
12.
DinkelmanT. (2011). “The effects of rural electrification on employment: New evidence from South Africa.”American Economic Review 101(7): 3078–3108. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.10L7.3078.
13.
DufloE. (2012). “Women empowerment and economic development.” Journal of Economic Literature50(4): 1051–79. https://doi.org/10.1257/jeL50A105L
14.
FangW. (2003). “Comparison and application of principal component analysis & factor analysis [j].” Statistical Education5(5): 14–17.
15.
FerrantG.ThimA. (2019). “Measuring women’s economic empowerment: Time use data and gender inequality.” Technical report, OECD Publishing.
16.
GabizonS. (2016). “Women’s movements’ engagement in the SDGs: lessons learned from the women’s major group.” Gender & Development24(1): 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2016.1145962.
17.
GouldC.F.UrpelainenJ. (2018). “Lpg as a clean cooking fuel: Adoption, use, and impact in rural India.” Energy Policy122: 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.042.
18.
JainV. (2018). Powering India at household level: State effort, issues and concerns.
19.
JensenR.OsterE. (2009). “The power of TV: Cable television and women’s status in India.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics124(3): 1057–1094. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1057.
20.
JosephK.L. (2010). “The politics of power: Electricity reform in India.” Energy Policy38(1): 503–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.041.
21.
KabeerN. (1999). “Resources, agency, achievements.” Development and Change30: 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125.
22.
KanagawaM.NakataT. (2008). “Assessment of access to electricity and the socio-economic impacts in rural areas of developing countries.” Energy Policy36(6): 2016–2029. https://doi.org/10.1016/.enpol.2008.01.041.
23.
KennedyR.MahajanA.UrpelainenJ. (2019). “Quality of service predicts willingness to pay for household electricity connections in rural India.” Energy Policy129: 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.034.
24.
KhandkerS.R.SamadH.A.AliR.BarnesD.F. (2014). “Who benefits most from rural electrification? Evidence in India.” The Energy Journal35(2). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.2.4.
25.
KohlinG.SillsE.O.PattanayakS.K.WilfongC. (2011). Energy, gender and development: what are the linkages? Where is the evidence? https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5800.
26.
MinB.O’KeeffeZ.ZhangF. (2017). Whose power gets cut? Using high-frequency satellite images to measure power supply irregularity. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8131.
27.
NarayananS.DasU.LiuY.BarrettC.B. (2017). “The ‘discouraged worker effect’ in public works programs: Evidence from the mgnrega in India.” World Development100: 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.024.
28.
O’DellK.PetersS.WhartonK. (2014). Women, energy, and economic empowerment: applying a gender lens to amplify the impact of energy access.
29.
ParikhJ. (2011). “Hardships and health impacts on women due to traditional cooking fuels: A case study of Himachal Pradesh, India.” Energy Policy39(12): 7587–7594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.055.
30.
RaoN.D. (2013). “Does (better) electricity supply increase household enterprise income in India?” Energy Policy57: 532–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.025.
31.
RathiS.S.VermaakC. (2018). “Rural electrification, gender and the labor market: A cross-country study of India and South Africa.” World Development109: 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.016.
32.
SamadH.A.ZhangF. (2019). Electrification and Women’s Empowerment: Evidence from Rural India. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8796.
33.
SedaiA.K.NepalR.JamasbT. (2020). “Flickering lifelines: Electrification and household welfare in India.” Energy Economics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104975.
34.
SharmaA.ParikhJ.SinghC. (2019). “Transition to LPG for cooking: A case study from two states of India.” Energy for Sustainable Development51: 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2019.06.001.
35.
StaigerD.StockJ.H. (1994). “Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments.” Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/t0151.
36.
StandalK.WintherT. (2016). “Empowerment through energy? Impact of electricity on care work practices and gender relations.” In Forum for Development Studies, Volume 43. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1 080/08039410.2015.1134642.
37.
StephensonR.KoenigM.A.AhmedS. (2006). “Domestic violence and contraceptive adoption in Uttar Pradesh, India.” Studies in Family Planning37(2): 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2006.00087.x.
38.
ThakurT.DeshmukhS.KaushikS.KulshresthaM. (2005). “Impact assessment of the electricity act 2003 on the Indian power sector.” Energy Policy33(9): 1187–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.11.016.
39.
WintherT.MatingaM.N.UlsrudK.StandalK. (2017). “Women’s empowerment through electricity access: scoping study and proposal for a framework of analysis.” Journal of Development Effectiveness9(3): 389–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2017.1343368.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
