A recent trend has been a move toward greater reliance on renewable or “green” energy sources, especially in the residential sector. Using a choice experiment, this paper examines how providing information regarding the efficiency, cost, and environmental impacts of different power-generating sources impact consumers’ stated preferences for selecting voluntary green-power plans. Based on 21,000 plan choices from two different samples totaling over 1,800 respondents, our results indicate that information nudges significantly impact respondents’ choice of plan. Promoting the advantages of the green plan or the disadvantages of the “gray” plan increase green plan selection. The magnitudes of these estimated effects are economically significant being roughly equivalent to a change in the monthly green price premium of $4/month. We also find that promoting the advantages of the green plan is more effective when the green plan premium is relatively small, while highlighting the drawbacks of the gray plan is more effective when the green plan premium is relatively large. Our results suggest that information nudges have the potential to be a plausible, economical, and effective mechanism to increase adoption of voluntary green-power plans.
AbrahamseW.StegL. (2013). “Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis.” Global Environmental Change23(6): 1773–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.gloenvcha.2013.07.029.
2.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT. (2005). “A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation.” Journal of Environmental Psychology25(3): 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvp.2005.08.002.
3.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT. (2007). “The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents.” Journal of Environmental Psychology27(4): 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvp.2007.08.002.
4.
AllcottH. (2011). “Social norms and energy conservation.” Journal of Public Economics95(9): 1082–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003.
5.
AllcottH. (2016). “Paternalism and energy efficiency: an overview.” Annual Review of Economics8: 145–176. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015255.
6.
AllcottH.GreenstoneM. (2017). “Measuring the Welfare Effects of Residential Energy Efficiency Programs (No.w23386).” National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23386.
7.
AllcottH.KesslerJ.B. (2019). “The welfare effects of nudges: A case study of energy use social comparisons.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 11(1): 236–276. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170328.
8.
AllcottH.MullainathanS. (2010). “Behavior and energy policy.” Science327(5970): 1204–1205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180775.
9.
AllcottH.RogersT. (2014). “The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation.” American Economic Review104(10): 3003–3037. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3003.
10.
AmadorF.J.GonzalezR.M.Ramos-RealF.J. (2013). “Supplier choice and WTP for electricity attributes in an emerging market: The role of perceived past experience, environmental concern and energy saving behavior.” Energy Economics40: 953–966. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.eneco.2013.06.007.
11.
AsensioO.I.DelmasM.A. (2015). “Nonprice incentives and energy conservation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112(6): E510–E515. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1401880112.
12.
AyresI.RasemanS.ShihA. (2013). “Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization29(5): 992–1022. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ews020.
13.
BaeJ.H.RishiM. (2018). “Increasing consumer participation rates for green pricing programs: A choice experiment for South Korea.” Energy Economics74: 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.027.
14.
BanerjeeA.SolomonB.D. (2003). “Eco-labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability: A meta-evaluation of US programs.” Energy Policy31(2): 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00012-5.
15.
BenartziS.BeshearsJ.MilkmanK.L.SunsteinC.R.ThalerR.H.ShankarM.GalingS. (2017). “Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?” Psychological Science28(8): 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501.
16.
BergmannA.ColomboS.HanleyN. (2008). “Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developments.” Ecological Economics65(3): 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.011.
17.
BergmannA.HanleyN.WrightR. (2006). “Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments.” Energy Policy34(9): 1004–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.035.
18.
BernedoM.FerraroP. J.PriceM. (2014). “The persistent impacts of norm-based messaging and their implications for water conservation.” Journal of Consumer Policy37(3): 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9266-0.
19.
BirdL.BolingerM.GaglianoT.WiserR.BrownM.ParsonsB. (2005). “Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States.” Energy Policy33(11): 1397–1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.018.
20.
BirdL.SumnerJ. (2010). “Green power marketing in the United States: A status report (2009 data).” Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-49403 (September). National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO.
21.
WustenhagenBird L.R.AabakkenJ. (2002). “A review of international green power markets: Recent experience, trends, and market drivers.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews6(6): 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(02)00033-3.
22.
BlankenI.van de VenN.ZeelenbergM. (2015). “A meta-analytic review of moral licensing.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin41(4): 540–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215572134.
23.
BollinoC.A. (2009). “The willingness to pay for renewable energy sources: The case of Italy with socio-demographic determinants.” The Energy Journal30(2): 81–96. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol30-No2-4.
24.
BorchersA.M.DukeJ.M.ParsonsG.R. (2007). “Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source?” Energy Policy35(6): 3327–3334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.009.
25.
BrentD.A.CookJ.H.OlsenS. (2015). “Social comparisons, household water use, and participation in utility conservation programs: Evidence from three randomized trials.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists2(4): 597–627. https://doi.org/10.1086/683427.
26.
BrounenD.KokN.QuigleyJ.M. (2013). “Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behavior of residential households.” Energy Economics38: 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.008.
27.
CardellaE.EwingB.T.WilliamsR.B. (2017). “Price volatility and residential electricity decisions: Experimental evidence on the convergence of energy generating source.” Energy Economics62: 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.012.
28.
ChampP.A.BishopR.C. (2001). “Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: An empirical study of hypothetical bias.” Environmental and Resource Economics19(4): 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011604818385.
29.
CiciaG.CembaloL.Del GiudiceT.PalladinoA. (2012). “Fossil energy versus nuclear, wind, solar and agricultural biomass: Insights from an Italian national survey.” Energy Policy42: 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.030.
30.
ClarkC.F.KotchenM.J.MooreM.R. (2003). “Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program.” Journal of Environmental Psychology23: 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00105-6.
31.
CrosonR.TreichN. (2014). “Behavioral environmental economics: Promises and challenges.” Environmental and Resource Economics58(3): 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9783-y.
32.
CostaF.GerardF. (2020). “Hysteresis and the Welfare Effect of Corrective Policies: Theory and Evidence from an Energy Saving Program.” Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/r4wep.
33.
ConteM.N.JacobsenG.D. (2016). “Explaining Demand for Green Electricity Using Data from All US Utilities.” Energy Economics60: 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.001.
34.
CostaD.L.KahnM.E. (2013). “Energy conservation “nudges” and environmentalist ideology: Evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment.” Journal of the European Economic Association11(3): 680–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12011.
35.
CutterW.B.NeidellM. (2009). “Voluntary information programs and environmental regulation: Evidence from ‘Spare the Air’.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management58(3): 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.03.003.
36.
DagherL.BirdL.HeeterJ. (2017). “Residential green power demand in the United States.” Renewable Energy114: 1062–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.111.
37.
DelmasM.A.FischleinM.AsensioO.I. (2013). “Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012.” Energy Policy61: 729–739. https://doi.org/10.10167j.enpol.2013.05.109.
38.
DelmasM.A.LessemN. (2014). “Saving power to conserve your reputation? The effectiveness of private versus public information.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management67(3): 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.12.009.
39.
Diaz-RaineyI.AshtonJ.K. (2008). “Stuck between a ROC and a hard place? Barriers to the take up of green energy in the UK.” Energy Policy36(8): 3053–3061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.038.
40.
Diaz-RaineyI.TzavaraD. (2012). “Financing the decarbonized energy system through green electricity tariffs: A diffusion model of an induced consumer environmental market.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change79(9): 1693–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.05.012.
41.
DonnerA. (1989). “Statistical methods in ophthalmology: an adjusted chi-square approach.” Biometrics: 605–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531501.
42.
DunlapR.E.Van LiereK.MertigA.JonesR.E. (2000). “Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale.” Journal of Social Issues56(3): 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176.
43.
EbelingF.LotzS. (2015). “Domestic uptake of green energy promoted by opt-out tariffs.” Nature Climate Change5(9): 868. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2681.
44.
EkK. (2005). “Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: The case of Swedish wind power.” Energy Policy33(13): 1677–1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.005.
45.
EkK.SoderholmP. (2010). “The devil is in the details: Household electricity saving behavior and the role of information.” Energy Policy38(3): 1578–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.041.
46.
FerraroPJ.MirandaJ.J.PriceM.K. (2011). “The persistence of treatment effects with norm-based policy instruments: evidence from a randomized environmental policy experiment.” American Economic Review101(3): 318–22. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.318.
47.
FerraroP.J.PriceM.K. (2013). “Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: evidence from a large-scale field experiment.” Review of Economics and Statistics95(1): 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00344.
48.
FowlieM.GoulderL.KotchenM.BorensteinS.BushnellJ.DavisL.WaraM. (2014). “An economic perspective on the EPA’s Clean Power Plan.” Science346(6211): 815–816. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261349.
49.
GanL.EskelandG.S.KolshusH.H. (2007). “Green electricity market development: Lessons from Europe and the US.” Energy Policy35(1): 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.10.008.
50.
GansW.AlberiniA.LongoA. (2013). “Smart meter devices and the effect of feedback on residential electricity consumption: Evidence from a natural experiment in Northern Ireland.” Energy Economics36: 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.11.022.
51.
GheslaC. (2017). “Defaults in Green Electricity Markets: Preference Match Not Guaranteed.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists4: 37–84. https://doi.org/10.1086/691977.
52.
GilbertB.ZivinJ.G. (2014). “Dynamic salience with intermittent billing: Evidence from smart electricity meters.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization107: 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjebo.2014.03.011.
53.
GoettA.A.HudsonK.TrainK.E. (2000). “Customers’ choice among retail energy suppliers: The willingness-to-pay for service attributes.” The Energy Journal21(4): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol21-No4-1.
54.
GoetteL.LeongC.QianN. (2019). “Motivating household water conservation: A field experiment in Singapore.” PloS one14(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211891.
55.
GosslingS.KunkelT.SchumacherK.HeckN.BirkemeyerJ.FroeseJ.NaberN.SchliermannE. (2005). “A target group-specific approach to “green” power retailing: Students as consumers of renewable energy.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews9(1): 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2004.01.005.
56.
GraciaA.Barreiro-HurleJ.y PerezL.P (2012). “Can renewable energy be financed with higher electricity prices? Evidence from a Spanish region.” Energy Policy50: 784–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.028.
57.
GreenbergM. (2009). “Energy sources, public policy, and public preferences: Analysis of US national and site-specific data.” Energy Policy37(8): 3242–3249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.020.
58.
HardingM.HsiawA. (2014). “Goal setting and energy conservation.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization107: 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjebo.2014.04.012.
59.
HerbesC.RammeI. (2014). “Online marketing of green electricity in Germany-A content analysis of providers’ websites.” Energy Policy66: 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.083.
60.
HoB.TaberJ.PoeG.BentoA. (2016). “The effects of moral licensing and moral cleansing in contingent valuation and laboratory experiments on the demand to reduce externalities.” Environmental and Resource Economics64(2): 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9872-y.
61.
HolladayJ.S.PriceM.K.WanamakerM. (2015). “The perverse impact of calling for energy conservation.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization110: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjebo.2014.11.008.
62.
HollingsworthA.RudikI. (2019). “External impacts of local energy policy: The case of renewable portfolio standards.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists6(1): 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1086/700419.
63.
HoudeS. (2018). “How consumers respond to product certification and the value of energy information.” The RAND Journal of Economics49(2): 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12231.
64.
HoudeS.ToddA.SudarshanA.FloraJ.A.ArmelK.C. (2013). “Real-time feedback and electricity consumption: A field experiment assessing the potential for savings and persistence.” The Energy Journal34(1): 87–102. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.34.1.4.
65.
ItoK.IdaT.TanakaM. (2018). “Moral Suasion and Economic Incentives: Field Experimental Evidence from Energy Demand.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy10(1): 240–267. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20160093.
66.
JessoeK.RapsonD. (2014). “Knowledge is (less) power: Experimental evidence from residential energy use.” American Economic Review104(4): 1417–1438. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104A1417.
67.
JohnsonE.J.ShuS.B.DellaertB.G.FoxC.GoldsteinD.G.HaublG.WansinkB. (2012). “Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture.”Marketing Letters 23(2): 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9186-1.
68.
KaenzigJ.HeinzleS.L.WustenhagenR. (2013). “Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany.” Energy Policy53: 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.061.
69.
KotchenM.J.MooreM.R. (2007). “Private provision of environmental public goods: Household participation in green-electricity programs.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management53(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2006.06.003.
70.
KotchenM.J.ReilingS.D. (2000). “Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: A case study involving endangered species.” Ecological Economics32(1): 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00069-5.
71.
KunreutherH.WeberE.U. (2014). “Aiding decision making to reduce the impacts of climate change.” Journal of Consumer Policy37(3): 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-013-9251-z.
72.
LiebeU.GewinnerJ.DiekmannA. (2018). “What is missing in research on non-monetary incentives in the household energy sector?” Energy Policy123: 180–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.036.
73.
LoewensteinG.ChaterN. (2017). “Putting nudges in perspective.” Behavioural Public Policy1(1): 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.7.
74.
LoewensteinG.HagmannD.SchwartzJ.EricsonK.KesslerJ.B.BhargavaS.NussbaumD. (2017). “A behavioral blueprint for improving health care policy.” Behavioral Science and Policy3(1): 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2017.0005.
75.
LongoA.MarkandyaA.PetrucciM. (2008). “The internalization of externalities in the production of electricity: Willingness to pay for the attributes of a policy for renewable energy.” Ecological Economics67(1): 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.006.
76.
LoockC.M.StaakeT.ThiesseF. (2013). “Motivating Energy-Efficient Behavior with Green IS: An Investigation of Goal Setting and the Role of Defaults.” MIS Quarterly37(4): 1313–1332. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37A15.
77.
MaC.BurtonM. (2016). “Warm glow from green power: Evidence from Australian electricity consumers.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management78: 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjeem.2016.03.003.
78.
MaC.RogersA.A.KragtM.E.ZhangF.PolyakovM.GibsonF.TapsuwanS. (2015). “Consumers’ willingness to pay for renewable energy: A meta-regression analysis.” Resource and Energy Economics42: 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.07.003.
79.
MacDonaldS.EyreN. (2018). “An international review of markets for voluntary green electricity tariffs.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews91: 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.028.
80.
MadrianB.C. (2014). “Applying insights from behavioral economics to policy design.” Annual Review of Economics6(1): 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041033.
81.
McCalleyL.T.MiddenC.J. (2002). “Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-settingand social orientation.” Journal of Economic Psychology23(5): 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00119-8.
82.
MenegakiA. (2008). “Valuation for renewable energy: A comparative review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews12(9): 2422–2437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.06.003.
83.
MenzF.C. (2005). “Green electricity policies in the United States: Case study.” Energy Policy33(18): 2398–2410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.05.011.
84.
MenzF.C.VachonS. (2006). “The effectiveness of different policy regimes for promoting wind power: Experiences from the states.” Energy Policy34(14): 1786–1796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.12.018.
85.
MewtonR.T.CachoO.J. (2011). “Green Power voluntary purchases: Price elasticity and policy analysis.” Energy Policy39(1): 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.013.
86.
MillsB.SchleichJ. (2012). “Residential energy-efficient technology adoption, energy conservation, knowledge, and attitudes: An analysis of European countries.” Energy Policy49: 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.008.
87.
MomsenK.StoerkT. (2014). “From intention to action: Can nudges help consumers to choose renewable energy?” Energy Policy74: 376–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.07.008.
88.
MozumderP.VasquezW.F.MaratheA. (2011). “Consumers’ preference for renewable energy in the southwest USA.” Energy Economics33(6): 1119–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.003.
89.
NewellR.G.JaffeA.B.StavinsR.N. (1999). “The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics114(3): 941–975. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556188.
90.
NewellR.G.SiikamakiJ. (2014). “Nudging energy efficiency behavior: The role of information labels.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists1(4): 555–598. https://doi.org/10.1086/679281.
91.
OerlemansL.A.ChanK.Y.VolschenkJ. (2016). “Willingness to pay for green electricity: A review of the contingent valuation literature and its sources of error.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews66: 875–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.054.
92.
OliverH.VolschenkJ.SmitE. (2011). “Residential consumers in the Cape Peninsula’s willingness to pay for premium priced green electricity.” Energy Policy39(2): 544–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.012.
93.
O’ShaughnessyE.HeeterJ.LiuC.NoblerE. (2016). “Status and Trends in the US Voluntary Green Power Market (2015 Data).” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL Technical Report, NREL/TP--6A20-67147, October 2016.
94.
PichertD.KatsikopoulosK.V. (2008). “Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour.” Journal of Environmental Psychology28(1): 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvp.2007.09.004.
95.
RamosA.GagoA.LabandeiraX.LinaresP. (2015). “The role of information for energy efficiency in the residential sector.” Energy Economics52: S17–S29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.022.
96.
ReissP.C.WhiteM.W. (2008). “What changes energy consumption? Prices and public pressures.” The RAND Journal of Economics39(3): 636–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00032.x.
97.
RoeB.TeislM.F.LevyA.RussellM. (2001). “US consumers’ willingness to pay for green electricity.” Energy Policy29(11): 917–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00006-4.
98.
SanchezM.C.BrownR.E.WebberC.HomanG.K. (2008). “Savings estimates for the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s ENERGY STAR voluntary product labeling program.” Energy Policy36(6): 2098–2108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.021.
99.
ScarpaR.WillisK. (2010). “Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households’ for micro-generation technologies.” Energy Economics32(1): 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.004.
100.
SchleichJ.KlobasaM.GolzS.BrunnerM. (2013). “Effects of feedback on residential electricity demand-Findings from a field trial in Austria.” Energy Policy61: 1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.012.
101.
SchultzP.W.NolanJ.M.CialdiniR.B.GoldsteinN.J.GriskeviciusV. (2007). “The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms.” Psychological Science18(5): 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.
102.
ShenJ.SaijoT. (2009). “Does an energy efficiency label alter consumers’ purchasing decisions? A latent class approach based on a stated choice experiment in Shanghai.” Journal of Environmental Management90(11): 3561–3573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.010.
103.
StegL. (2008). “Promoting household energy conservation.” Energy Policy36(12): 4449–4453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.027.
104.
StegL.BolderdijkJ.W.KeizerK.PerlaviciuteG. (2014). “An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals.” Journal of Environmental Psychology38: 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002.
105.
StegL.VlekC. (2009). “Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda.” Journal of Environmental Psychology29(3): 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvp.2008.10.004.
106.
SundtS.RehdanzK. (2015). “Consumers’ willingness to pay for green electricity: A meta-analysis of the literature.” Energy Economics51: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.06.005.
107.
SunsteinC.R.ReischL.A. (2013). “Green by default.” Kyklos66(3): 398–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12028.
108.
TabiA.HilleS.L.WustenhagenR. (2014). “What makes people seal the green power deal?-Customer segmentation based on choice experiment in Germany.” Ecological Economics107: 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecole-con.2014.09.004.
109.
ThalerR.H.SunsteinC.R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
110.
UngemachC.CamilleriA.R.JohnsonE.J.LarrickR.P.WeberE.U. (2017). “Translated Attributes as Choice Architecture: Aligning Objectives and Choices Through Decision Signposts.” Management Science64(5): 2445–2459. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2703.
111.
VachonS.MenzF.C. (2006). “The role of social, political, and economic interests in promoting state green electricity policies.” Environmental Science and Policy9(7): 652–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.07.005.
112.
WardD.O.ClarkC.D.JensenK.L.YenS.T.RussellC.S. (2011). “Factors influencing willingness-to-pay for the ENERGY STAR® label.” Energy Policy39(3): 1450–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.017.
113.
WhiteheadJ.C.CherryT.L. (2007). “Willingness to pay for a green energy program: A comparison of ex-ante and expost hypothetical bias mitigation approaches.” Resource and Energy Economics29(4): 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2006.10.001.
114.
WiserR. (2007). “Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles.” Ecological Economics62(3): 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.003.
115.
WiserR.OlsonS.BirdL.SwezeyB. (2005). “Utility green pricing programs: A statistical analysis of program effectiveness.” Energy and Environment16(1): 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305053516172.
116.
XieB.C.ZhaoW. (2018). “Willingness to pay for green electricity in Tianjin, China: Based on the contingent valuation method.” Energy Policy114: 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.067.
117.
YooS.H.KwakS.Y. (2009). “Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: A contingent valuation study.” Energy Policy37(12): 5408–5416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.062.
118.
ZarnikauJ. (2003). “Consumer demand for ‘green power’ and energy efficiency.” Energy Policy31(15): 1661–1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00232-X.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
