We explore the drivers of impact for energy economics research based on an analysis of citations generated by The Energy Journal articles. The focus is on nontopic generators of impact. Our regression analysis shows that these non-topic measures can explain a substantial proportion (about 20%) of variation in future citations. We apply these findings, integrated with prior research on effective economics writing style, to recommend how energy economics articles should be written to increase their impact. These recommendations center particularly around the importance of initial article information provided to the reader and article structure.
BailinA.GrafsteinA. (2016). Readability: Text and Context. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137388773.
2.
BanksD. (2017). “The extent to which the passive voice is used in the scientific journal article, 1985-2015.” Functional Linguistics4(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-017-0045-5.
3.
CamposJ.EricssonN.R.HendryD.F. (2005). “General-to-specific modeling: An overview and selected bibliography.” FRB International Finance Discussion Paper. https://doi.org/10.17016/IFDP.2005.838.
4.
CardD.DellaVignaS. (2017). “What do editors maximize? Evidence from four leading economics journals.” National Bureau of Economic Research, w23282. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23282.
5.
ClarkC.DivvalaS. (2016). “Pdffigures 2.0: Mining figures from research papers.” 2016 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL) 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2910896.2910904.
6.
ClarkeD. (2014). “General-to-specific modeling in Stata.” The Stata Journal14(4): 895-908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1401400412.
7.
ColquittJ.A.Zapata-PhelanC.P. (2007). “Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal.” Academy of Management Journal50(6): 1281-1303. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj. 2007.28165855.
8.
CostelloM.J.BeardK.H.PrimackR.B.DevictorV.BatesA.E. (2019). “Are killer bees good for coffee? The contribution of a paper’s title and other factors to its future citations.” Biological Conservation229: A1-A5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.010.
9.
DowlingM.HammamiH.ZreikO. (2018). “Easy to read, easy to cite?” Economics Letters173: 100-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.09.023.
10.
FalagasM.E.ZarkaliA.KarageorgopoulosD.E.BardakasV.MavrosM.N. (2013). “The impact of article length on the number of future citations: A bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals.” PLoS One 8(2): e49476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049476.
HudsonJ. (2016). “An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: Authors, disciplines, and stylistic details.” Scientometrics109(2): 871-889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2081-4.
13.
HurleyL.A.OgierA.L.TorvikV.I. (2013). “Deconstructing the collaborative impact: Article and author characteristics that influence citation count.” Proceedings of the 76th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Beyond the Cloud: Rethinking Information Boundaries. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001070.
14.
HurleyL.A.OgierA.L.TorvikV.I. (2015). “What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members?” Scientometrics103(2): 489-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1537-2.
15.
JamaliH.R.NikzadM. (2011). “Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations.” Scientometrics88(2): 653-661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0412-z.
16.
LeimuR.KorichevaJ. (2005). “What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?” Trends in Ecology & Evolution20(1): 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.010.
17.
LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.WagnerC.S. (2017). “Generating clustered journal maps: An automated system for hierarchical classification.” Scientometrics110(3): 1601-1614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2226-5.
18.
LiE.Y.LiaoC.H.YenH.R. (2013). “Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective.” Research Policy42(9): 1515-1530. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.respol.2013.06.012.
19.
LinC.-S.HuangM.-H.ChenD.-Z. (2013). “The influences of counting methods on university rankings based on paper count and citation count.” Journal of Informetrics7(3): 611-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjoi.2013.03.007.
McCloskeyD. (2019). Economical Writing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (3rd ed.tion).
22.
PenfieldT.BakerM.J.ScobleR., and m. C. Wykes (2014). “Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review.” Research Evaluation23(1): 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt021.
23.
ReinsteinA.HasselbackJ.R.RileyM.E.SinasonD.H. (2011). “Pitfalls of using citation indices for making academic accounting promotion, tenure, teaching load, and merit pay decisions.” Issues in Accounting Education26(1): 99-131. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2011.26.1.99.
24.
RothC.WuJ.LozanoS. (2012). “Assessing impact and quality from local dynamics of citation networks.” Journal of Informetrics6(1): 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjoi.2011.08.005.
25.
SparroweR.T.MayerK.J. (2011). “Publishing in AMJ-part 4: Grounding hypotheses.” Academy of Management Journal54(6): 1098-1102. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.4001.
TahamtanI.AfsharA.S.AhamdzadehK. (2016). “Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature.” Scientometrics107(3): 1195-1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2.
28.
ThelwallM.SudP. (2016). “National, disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact: Evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator.” Journal of Informetrics10(1): 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjoi.2015.11.007.
29.
Van WeselM.WyattS.ten HaafJ. (2014). “What a difference a colon makes: How superficial factors influence subsequent citation.” Scientometrics98(3): 1601-1615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1154-x.
30.
WalkerT.C. (2010). “The perils of paradigm mentalities: Revisiting Kuhn, Lakatos, and Popper.” Perspectives on Politics8(2): 433-51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001180.
31.
WeissM.NewmanA.M. (2011). “A guide to writing articles in energy science.” Applied Energy88(11): 3941-3948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.007.
32.
ZimmermanJ.L. (1989). “Improving a manuscript’s readability and likelihood of publication.” Issues in Accounting Education4(2): 458-466.
