The development of sustainable energy systems is pivotal in addressing climate change, but is also a complex and multifaceted task that should take into consideration a wide range of technological and socio-economic issues. The energy trilemma concept acknowledges this complexity and emphasizes the need to achieve a balance among three main dimensions: energy security, energy equity, and environmental sustainability. This study provides a systematic treatment of the energy trilemma at the country level. A novel multicriteria assessment framework is employed to evaluate the related performance of countries. Such an evaluation provides useful results for policy making, as it enables the examination of the status of each country and the challenges that it faces in achieving energy sustainability. The obtained empirical results are analyzed over time as well as considering the characteristics of the countries.
AckermanF.MunitzC. (2016). A critique of climate damage modeling: Carbon fertilization, adaptation, and the limits of FUND. Energy Research &Social Science 12: 62-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.008.
2.
AndriosopoulosK.GalariotisE.SpyrouS. (2017). “Contagion, volatility persistence and volatility spill-overs: The case of energy markets during the European financial crisis.” Energy Economics66: 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.06.023.
3.
AngB.W.ChoongW.L.NgT.S. (2015). “Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews42: 1077-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.064.
4.
APERC. (2007). A Quest for Energy Security in The 21st Century Resources and Constraints. Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC). Japan. Retrieved from www.ieej.or.jp/aperc
5.
ApergisN. (2015). “Does renewables production affect income inequality? Evidence from an international panel of countries.” Applied Economics Letters22: 865-868. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2014.982852.
6.
BerryA.JouffeY.CoulombelN.GuivarchC. (2016). “Investigating fuel poverty in the transport sector: Toward a composite indicator of vulnerability.” Energy Research and Social Science18: 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.02.001.
7.
BoardmanB. (1991). Fuel Poverty: From Cold Homes to Affordable Warmth. London: Belhaven Press.
8.
BöhringerC.BortolamediM. (2015). “Sense and no(n)-sense of energy security indicators.” Ecological Economics119: 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.020.
9.
BottaE.KoźlukT. (2014). “Measuring Environmental Policy Stringency in OECD Countries: A Composite Index Approach,” (1177). Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjnc45gvg-en.
10.
BrundtlandG.H. (1987). “Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development.” United Nations Commission4(1): 300.
11.
CaprosP.ParoussosL.CharalampidisI.FragkiadakisK.KarkatsoulisP.TsaniS. (2016). “Assessment of the macroeconomic and sectoral effects of higher electricity and gas prices in the EU: A general equilibrium modeling approach.” Energy Strategy Reviews9: 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2015.11.002.
12.
CherchyeL.MoesenW.RoggeN.Van PuyenbroeckT. (2007). “An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators.” Social Indicators Research82(1): 111-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/1_suppl1205-006-9029-7.
13.
CherchyeL.MoesenW.Van PuyenbroeckT. (2004). “Legitimately diverse, yet comparable: On synthesising social inclusion performance in the EU.” Journal of Common Market Studies42(5): 919-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00535.x
14.
CherpA. (2012). “Defining energy security takes more than asking around.” Energy Policy48: 841-842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.016.
15.
CherpA.JewellJ. (2011). “The three perspectives on energy security: intellectual history, disciplinary roots and the potential for integration.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability3(4): 202-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cos-ust.2011.07.001.
16.
CooperW.W.SeifordL.M.ToneK. (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis. Boston, MA: Springer.
17.
De AlmeidaP.N.DiasL.C. (2012). “Value-based DEA models: application-driven developments.” Journal of the Operational Research Society63(1): 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.15.
18.
DecancqK.LugoM.A. (2012). “Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Wellbeing: An Overview.” Econometric Reviews32(1): 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2012.690641.
19.
DeLlano-PazF.MartínezP. Fernandez, and I. Soares (2016). “Addressing 2030 EU policy framework for energy and climate: Cost, risk and energy security issues.” Energy115: 1347-1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.068.
20.
FleurbaeyM.TadenumaK. (2014). “Universal social orderings: An integrated theory of policy evaluation, inter-society comparisons, and interpersonal comparisons.” Review of Economic Studies81(3): 1071-1101. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdu006.
21.
FS-UNEP. (2018). Global trends in renewable energy investment 2018. Retrieved from http://fs-unep-centre.org/sites/default/files/publications/gtr2018v2.pdf
22.
GrigoroudisE.KouikoglouV.S.PhillisY.A. (2015). “Energy sustainability of Countries.” Handbook of Research on Sustainable Development and Economics i: 96-117. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8433-1.ch006.
23.
GrossiL.MussiniM. (2017). “Inequality in Energy Intensity in the EU-28: Evidence from a New Decomposition Method.” The Energy Journal38(4): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.4.lgro.
24.
HillsJ. (2011). “Fuel poverty: the problem and its measurement.” CASE report (69). Retrieved from http://eprints.lse ac.uk/39270/.
25.
HüblerM. (2017). “The inequality-emissions nexus in the context of trade and development: A quantile regression approach.” Ecological Economics134: 174-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.015.
26.
HughesL. (2009). “The four ‘R’s of energy security.” Energy Policy37(6): 2459-2461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-pol.2009.02.038.
27.
IRENA (2018). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2017. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi.
28.
JacksonR.B.VengoshA.CareyJ.W.DaviesR.J.DarrahT.H.O’SullivanF.PétronG. (2014). The “Environmental Costs and Benefits of Fracking.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources39(August): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-031113-144051.
29.
JordaanS.M.Romo-RabagoE.McLearyR.ReidyL.NazariJ.HerremansI.M. (2017). “The role of energy technology innovation in reducing greenhouse gas emissions: A case study of Canada.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews78(May): 1397-1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.162.
30.
JorgensonA.SchorJ.HuangX. (2017). “Income Inequality and Carbon Emissions in the United States: A State-level Analysis, 1997-2012.” Ecological Economics134: 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.016.
31.
KeeneyR.L.RaiffaH. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174084.
32.
KeeneyR.L.SichermanA. (1976). “Assessing and analyzing preferences concerning multiple objectives: An interactive computer program.” Behavioral Science21(3): 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830210304.
33.
KhanF.HeineckerP. (2018). “Inequality and energy: Revisiting the relationship between disparity of income distribution and energy use from a complex systems perspective.” Energy Research and Social Science42(January): 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.026.
34.
KruytB.Van VuurenD.P.P.de VriesH.J.M.J.M.GroenenbergH. (2009). “Indicators for energy security.” Energy Policy37(6): 2166-2181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.006.
35.
KuzemkoC.LockwoodM.MitchellC.HoggettR. (2016). “Governing for sustainable energy system change: Politics, contexts and contingency.” Energy Research and Social Science12: 96-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.022.
36.
LawranceE.C. (1991). “Poverty and the Rate of Time Preference: Evidence from Panel Data.” Journal of Political Economy99(1): 54-77. https://doi.org/10.1086/261740.
37.
LiY.ShiX.YaoL. (2016). “Evaluating energy security of resource-poor economies: A modified principle component analysis approach.” Energy Economics58: 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.001.
38.
LimS.S.VosT.FlaxmanA.D.DanaeiG.ShibuyaK.Adair-RohaniH.and...EzzatiM.(2013). “A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 19902010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.” The Lancet380(9859): 2224-2260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8.
39.
MakridouG.AndriosopoulosK.DoumposM.ZopounidisC. (2015). “Measuring the efficiency of energy-intensive industries across European countries.” Energy Policy88: 573-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.042.
40.
MattioliG.LucasK.MarsdenG. (2017). “Transport poverty and fuel poverty in the UK: From analogy to comparison.” Transport Policy59(June): 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.07.007.
41.
MetcalfG.E. (2014). “The Economics of Energy Security.” Annual Review of Resource Economics6(1): 155-174. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012333.
42.
MisikM. (2016). “On the way towards the Energy Union: Position of Austria, the Czech Republic and Slovakia towards external energy security integration.” Energy111: 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.056.
43.
MooreR. (2012). “Definitions of fuel poverty: Implications for policy.” Energy Policy49: 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.057.
44.
NardoM.SaisanaM.SaltelliA.TarantolaS.HoffmanA.GiovanniniE. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en.
45.
NarulaK.ReddyB.S. (2015). “Three blind men and an elephant: The case of energy indices to measure energy security and energy sustainability.” Energy80: 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.055.
46.
PhillisY.A.AndriantiatsaholiniainaL.A. (2001). “Sustainability: An ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic.” Ecological Economics37(3): 435-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00290-1.
47.
PindyckR.S. (2007). “Uncertainty in Environmental Economics.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy1(1): 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rem002.
48.
PindyckR. (2012). “Uncertain outcomes and climate change policy.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management63(3): 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.12.001.
49.
PindyckR.S. (2013). “Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us?” Journal of Economic Literature 51(3): 860872. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.3.860.
50.
SekulicD.P.NeheteR.YuC.N.FuH. (2014). “An energy sustainability metric.” Energy74(C): 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.078.
51.
SenA. (1976). “Real National Income.” The Review of Economic Studies43(1): 19-36. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296597.
52.
SenA. (1997). Collective Choice and Social Welfare-Expanded Edition. London, UK: Penguin Books.
53.
SovacoolB.K. (2013). “An international assessment of energy security performance.” Ecological Economics88: 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.019.
54.
SovacoolB.K.MukherjeeI. (2011). “Conceptualizing and measuring energy security: A synthesized approach.” Energy36(8): 5343-5355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.043.
55.
Valdés LucasJ.N.Escribano FrancésG.San Martín González E.(2016). “Energy security and renewable energy deployment in the EU: Liaisons Dangereuses or Virtuous Circle?” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 62:10321046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.069.
56.
WinzerC. (2012). “Conceptualizing energy security.” Energy Policy46: 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.067.
